journal article·2023-01

Prediction of bonded asymmetric metallic cross-tension and single lap shear joints using finite element model with material-level adhesive properties and cohesive zone method

Ahmed H. Ibrahim, Brock Watson, Hamid Jahed, Saeid Rezaee, Christine Royer, Duane S. Cronin

Publisher page

Abstract

Predictive finite element (FE) models of adhesive joints are needed to enable the design and evaluation of adhesively joined structures, particularly large-scale structures that may be costly to assess experimentally. Although models calibrated to coupon-level tests have provided an important first-step, models based on material-level characterization are needed to enable joint assessment in complex modes of loading. In the present study, a structural epoxy adhesive was characterized using rigid double cantilever (Mode I) and bonded shear (Mode II) specimens to provide material-level input properties. Three single-lap shear (SLJ) and seven cross-tension (CT) specimen configurations were fabricated with aluminum and steel sheet materials. The specimens included symmetrical (the same adherend material and thickness) and asymmetrical (dissimilar adherend material or unequal thickness) configurations, with three loading angles (0°, 45°, 90°) for the CT specimens. Finite element models of the SLJ and CT specimens were developed using Cohesive Zone Modeling for the adhesive, with properties determined from the Mode I and Mode II characterization tests. The FE models of the SLJ and CT test specimens predicted the peak load within an average difference of 2%–19%. The joint strength varied between different test configurations, owing to adherend deformation, load eccentricity and mixed-mode loading. Importantly, the model parameters were not calibrated to the SLJ and CT tests. The FE models were able to predict joint response for varying test specimen geometry, adherend thickness, adherend material, and modes of loading.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Metallic multi-material adhesive joint testing and modeling for vehicle lightweighting10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102421 ↗
2. Benefit of structural adhesives in full car crash applications10.4271/2014-01-0811 ↗
3. Mechanical characterization of a modern epoxy adhesive for automotive industry10.1007/s40430-019-1844-2 ↗
4. da Silva · 2018
5. Damage of bonded, riveted and hybrid (bonded/riveted) joints, Experimental and numerical study using CZM and XFEM methods
6. Stiffness and strength analysis of hybrid adhesive bonded–resistance spot welded sandwich samples by means of virtual FE testing10.1080/00218464.2018.1553713 ↗
7. Direct measurement of the cohesive law of adhesives using a rigid double cantilever beam technique10.1007/s11340-013-9755-0 ↗
8. Mode I traction-separation measured using rigid double cantilever beam applied to structural adhesive10.1080/00218464.2018.1502666 ↗
9. Quantification of mixed mode loading and bond line thickness on adhesive joint strength using novel test specimen geometry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102682 ↗
10. Numerical study of impact behaviour of mixed adhesive single lap joints for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.036 ↗
11. Analysis of the mechanical performance of hybrid (SPR/bonded) single-lap joints between CFRP panels and aluminum blanks10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.008 ↗
12. Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.012 ↗
13. Mechanical testing of adhesive, self-piercing rivet, and hybrid jointed aluminum under tension loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103066 ↗
14. Single lap joints loaded in tension with high strength steel adherends10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.016 ↗
15. Single lap joints loaded in tension with ductile steel adherends10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.017 ↗
16. Experimental investigation on adhesively bonded U-shaped metallic joints using the Arcan test
17. Mechanoluminescent study for optimization of joint design on cross tension test
18. Mechanical properties of joints in 5052 aluminum made with adhesive bonding and mechanical fasteners10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.030 ↗
19. Effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.023 ↗
20. Derivation of a fatigue damage law for an adhesive from in-situ bending tests10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107587 ↗
21. Effect of the cohesive law shape on the modelling of adhesive joints bonded with brittle and ductile adhesives10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.017 ↗
22. Adhesive selection for single lap bonded joints: experimentation and advanced techniques for strength prediction10.1080/00218464.2014.994703 ↗
23. Tensile fatigue life prediction of adhesively bonded structures based on CZM technique and a modified degradation approach10.1177/0954410020951675 ↗
24. Numerical prediction on the tensile residual strength of repaired CFRP under different geometric changes10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.03.005 ↗
25. Marzi · 2009
26. Cohesive zone modeling of mode I fracture in adhesive bonded joints10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.348-349.13 ↗
27. Effect of adherends rigidity on the shear strength of single lap adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.003 ↗
28. Assessment of cohesive traction-separation relationships in ABAQUS: a comparative study10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.09.004 ↗
29. Overcoming the convergence difficulty of cohesive zone models through a Newton-Raphson modification technique10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107046 ↗