Improving single-lap joint load bearing by bioinspired interlocking patterns on substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to evaluate the effect of adding a pattern of conical holes on the substrate surface to improve mechanical interlocking of the bonded joint. The holes allowed the formation of micro pillars in the adhesive layer, promoting mechanical interlocking and considerably increasing the resistance of the joints. The single-lap shear tests were performed according to the ASTM D1002 standard. The results showed that the proposed solution presents a viable alternative to improve the resistance of bonded joints, promoting an increase of up to 99.84% in the final displacement and final resistance of the tested specimens. The finite element analysis also showed a reduction up to 18.11% in the stress peaks in the singularity point of the adhesive layer. Significant changes in the stress distribution around the micro pillars also was observed. Failures also have changed from an almost entirely adhesive condition to extremely fragmented cohesive failures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. An experimental and numerical study on adhesive joints for composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.052 ↗
2. Adhesively bonded single lap joints with non-flat interfaces10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.09.004 ↗
3. Finite element inversion method for interfacial stress analysis of composite single-lap adhesively bonded joint based on full-field deformation10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.11.011 ↗
4. A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.006 ↗
5. Stress concentration factors for bonded lap joints10.2514/3.44305 ↗
6. An elasto-plastic investigation of the peel test10.1080/00218468208073190 ↗
7. The influence of local geometry on the strength of adhesive joints10.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3 ↗
8. Analysis of manufacturing parameters on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.11.006 ↗
9. Campilho · 2017
10. Surface properties of plastic materials in relation to their adhering performance10.1002/1527-2648(20020503)4:5<280::AID-ADEM280>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
11. Influence of surface micropatterns on the mode I fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102718 ↗
12. Gecko-inspired dry adhesive based on micro-nanoscale hierarchical arrays for application in climbing devices10.1021/acsami.7b09526 ↗
13. Smart superhydrophobic shape memory adhesive surface toward selective capture/release of microdroplets10.1021/acsami.9b00278 ↗
14. The carbon nanotubes effect into single-lap joint failure modes and load capacity: a macromechanical analysis10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0442 ↗
15. Analysis of residual stress around a Berkovich nano-indentation by micro-Raman spectroscopy10.1063/1.5080179 ↗
16. American Society for Testing and Materials · 2019 · vol. 6
17. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
18. An analysis of nanoindentation in elasto-plastic solids10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.016 ↗
19. Mechanical behavior of polyurethane adhesive bonded joints as a function of temperature and humidity10.1080/01694243.2017.1363141 ↗
20. da Silva · Modeling of Adhesively Bonded Joint · 2008 · 110.1007/978-3-540-79056-3 ↗