journal article·2013-03

Evaluation of natural rubber latex-based PSAs containing aliphatic hydrocarbon tackifier dispersions with different softening points—Adhesive properties at different conditions

P. Rajesh Raja, A.G. Hagood, M.A. Peters, S.G. Croll

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Natural rubber latex-based water–borne pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs) have been formulated with three aliphatic hydrocarbon water-based dispersions (varying softening points) at two different resin addition levels (25% and 50%). Time–temperature superposition analysis using WLF approximations for adhesive peel has revealed that the adhesives formulated with 50% resin addition level show good adhesive behavior. It has also been determined from time–temperature superposition analysis that peel force increases systematically with softening point and peel rate. Correlation of viscoelastic behavior with adhesive properties suggests that at least 50% resin addition level is needed to bring the natural rubber-based formulations into PSA criteria as defined by Dahlquist and others. Adhesive property evaluations performed on a high surface energy substrate (stainless steel) and low surface energy substrate (LDPE) suggested that optimum tack, peel and shear properties at room temperature were obtained for a formulation containing a higher softening point dispersion (95 °C) at 50% resin addition level. Adhesive peel and tack tend to follow softening point trends as well. A 25% tackifier dispersion addition level did not provide any significant adhesion. Humid aging (50 °C and 100% relative humidity) evaluations of the water–borne adhesives seem to correlate well with the room temperature adhesive property observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. WH Sheout and HH Day, US Patent 3965; 1845.
2. Satas · 1982
3. RG Drew, GB Patent 312610; 1930.
4. RG Drew, GB Patent 405263; 1934.
5. Sanderson · Adhes Age · 1978 · 31
6. Demarteau · Prog Org Coat · 1996 · 27 · 3310.1016/0300-9440(95)00517-X ↗
7. Oldack · Adhes Age · 1979 · 38
8. KF Gazeley, Proc. Industry Technical Conference, Pressure Sensitive tape Council; April 30 1983.
9. Benedek · 1997
10. Kaelble · 1971
11. Yarusso · 2002 · 499
12. Dahlquist · 1989 · 97
13. Kraus · J Adhes · 1977 · 8 · 23510.1080/00218467608075086 ↗
14. Sheriff · J Appl Polym Sci · 1973 · 17 · 342310.1002/app.1973.070171114 ↗
15. Class · J Appl Polym Sci · 1985 · 30 · 80510.1002/app.1985.070300229 ↗
16. Chu · 1989 · 159
17. Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes, 14th ed., Pressure Sensitive Tape Council (PSTC), Northbrook, IL; 2004.
18. Satas · 1989 · 61
19. Kim · J Appl Polym Sci · 1995 · 56 · 20110.1002/app.1995.070560210 ↗
20. Derail · J Adhes · 1997 · 64 · 12310.1080/00218469708010519 ↗
21. Lakrout · J Adhes · 1999 · 69 · 30710.1080/00218469908017233 ↗
22. Gower · J Poly Sci Part B: Polym Phys · 2006 · 44 · 123710.1002/polb.20779 ↗
23. McGuiggan · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2008 · 28 · 18510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.05.004 ↗
24. Williams · J Am Chem Soc · 1955 · 77 · 370110.1021/ja01619a008 ↗
25. Macosko · 1994 · 109