Physicochemical characterization of glass and polyethylene surfaces treated with different surfactants and their effects on bacterial adhesion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Bacterial proliferation in the form of biofilm fixed on a substrate is the result of a set of physical, chemical and biological processes. Microbial adhesion to a substrate is often considered to be the result of physicochemical interactions between the substrate and the microbial cells. These interactions include electrostatic interactions, Van der Waals interactions and acid-base interactions (electron donor - electron acceptor). The exact role of these physicochemical properties is still poorly documented. The purpose of this work is to provide some clarifications on this subject. The phenomenon of adhesion is often studied on clean surfaces, whereas in reality, it is always conditioned depending on its environment (medical, food or cosmetic). This is why in the present work we treated two different surfaces: glass and polyethylene, with diverse surfactants: nonionic, anionic and cationic. The choice of surfactants was motivated by its wide application in different fields. The physicochemical properties of the two substrata (treated and untreated) were defined using contact angle measurements. Moreover, the adhesive behavior of Staphylococcus aureus, as a bacterial model, on the studied substratum was assessed. The obtained results indicate that the physicochemical parameters of the two supports have changed in a specific way to each surfactant. The non-ionic surfactant turned both the surfaces more hydrophilic. However, the anionic and cationic surfactants have reversed the physicochemical characteristics of the surfaces. The correlation coefficients of the physicochemical properties and the adhesive behavior show that there is an association between the wettability of the two surfaces and the rate of the adherent cells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. The growing importance of materials that prevent microbial adhesion: antimicrobial effect of medical devices containing silver10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.01.017 ↗
2. Identification of surface characteristics relevant to the hygienic status of stainless steel for the food industry10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00150-4 ↗
3. Impact of alginate conditioning film on deposition kinetics of motile and nonmotile Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains10.1128/AEM.00678-07 ↗
4. A brief recap of microbial adhesion and biofilms10.3390/app9142801 ↗
5. Effect of pH on distribution and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to glass10.1163/1568561053066891 ↗
6. Temperature modulation of integrin-mediated cell adhesion10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.037 ↗
7. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates10.1039/C7RA01571B ↗
8. Draži · 2016
9. Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis10.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.007 ↗
10. Bohinc · International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity · 2014 · 50 · 26510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027 ↗
11. Initial adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biomedical polymers
12. Current and emerging environmentally-friendly systems for fouling control in the marine environment10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.002 ↗
13. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel treated with three types of milk10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.006 ↗
14. Micellar parameters of aqueous solutions of tween 20 and 60 at different temperatures: volumetric and viscometric study10.3390/colloids2030034 ↗
15. Characteristics and environmental fate of the anionic surfactant sodium lauryl ether sulphate (SLES) used as the main component in foaming agents for mechanized tunnelling10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.008 ↗
16. Adaptive resistance and differential protein expression of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilms exposed to benzalkonium chloride10.1128/AAC.00573-06 ↗
17. Resistances to benzalkonium chloride of bacteria dried with food elements on stainless steel surface10.1016/j.lwt.2007.06.016 ↗
18. Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infections: the role of a rapid and low-cost characterization for the establishment of a surveillance system
19. Staphylococcus aureus food-poisoning outbreak associated with the consumption of ice-cream10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.06.017 ↗
20. Effect of pH on surface energy of glass and Teflon and theoretical prediction of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion10.1016/j.msec.2008.10.023 ↗
21. Adhesive capabilities of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from tears of HIV/AIDS patients to soft contact lenses
22. Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion10.1128/aem.48.5.980-983.1984 ↗
23. Acid—base interfacial interactions in aqueous media10.1016/0927-7757(93)80308-2 ↗
24. Microbial adhesion to solvents: a novel method to determine the electron-donor/electron-acceptor or Lewis acid-base properties of microbial cells10.1016/0927-7765(96)01272-6 ↗
25. Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.05.006 ↗
26. Role of chemical interactions in bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.061 ↗
27. Concise review OF mechanisms OF bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and OF techniques used IN estimating bacteria-
28. Johansson · 2007
29. How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs?10.3389/fcimb.2014.00112 ↗
30. Cell surface hydrophobicity, biofilm formation, adhesives properties and molecular detection of adhesins genes in Staphylococcus aureus associated to dental caries10.1016/j.micpath.2010.03.007 ↗
31. Physicochemical surface properties of nonencapsulated and encapsulated coagulase-negative staphylococci10.1128/aem.55.11.2806-2814.1989 ↗
32. Some physical factors affecting the accumulation of biofouling10.1017/S002531549800040X ↗
33. Adhesion of Streptococcus thermophilus to stainless steel with different surface topography and roughness10.1080/08927019709378331 ↗
34. Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001 ↗
35. Effect of ionic strength on initial interactions ofEscherichia coli with surfaces, studied on-line by a novel quartz crystal microbalance technique10.1128/JB.181.17.5210-5218.1999 ↗
36. Polysorbates 20 and 80 used in the formulation of protein biotherapeutics: structure and degradation pathways10.1002/jps.21190 ↗
37. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm disruption using microbial surfactants10.1111/jam.13049 ↗
38. Antibacterial composite restorative materials for dental applications
39. Decreased bacterial adherence and biofilm growth on surfaces coated with a solution of benzalkonium chloride10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.012 ↗
40. An in vitro bacterial adhesion assessment of surface-modified medical-grade PVC10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.02.006 ↗
41. Bohinc · International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives Metal surface characteristics dictate bacterial adhesion capacity · 2016 · 68 · 39
42. The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants10.1186/s40729-017-0093-3 ↗
43. Micro-and nanotopography sensitive bacterial attachment mechanisms: a review10.3389/fmicb.2019.00191 ↗
44. A reference guide to microbial cell surface hydrophobicity based on contact angles10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00037-X ↗
45. Modification of the surfaces of medical devices to prevent microbial adhesion and biofilm formation10.1016/j.jhin.2013.06.015 ↗
46. Adhesion to and viability of Listeria monocytogenes on food contact surfaces10.4315/0362-028X-71.7.1379 ↗