journal article·2015-04Open access

Predicting the strength of adhesively bonded joints of variable thickness using a cohesive element approach

Mildred Lee, Eudora Yeo, Matthew Blacklock, Madabhushi Janardhana, Stefanie Feih, Chun H. Wang

Abstract

One major characteristic of bonded structures is the highly localised nature of deformation near sharp corners, ply-terminations, and ends of joints where load transfer occurs. This paper presents an investigation of the use of a cohesive zone model in predicting the strong effects of stress concentration due to varying adherend thickness on the pull-off strength measured by the Pneumatic Adhesion Tensile Testing Instrument. A comparison is made with the point-strain-at-a-distance criterion, where the plastic deformation of the adhesive is analysed using a modified Drucker–Prager/cap plasticity material model. The fracture properties of the cohesive zone model were determined using double-cantilever and end-notch flexural specimens, and the cohesive strengths were measured using tensile and lap shear tests. Comparisons with experimental results reveal that the cohesive zone model with perfectly plastic (or non-strain-softening) cohesive law provides accurate predictions of joint strengths.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Adams, RD and Karachalios, EF. Can we really predict accurately the strength of adhesively bonded joints? In: Proceedings of the 8th Australiasia congress on applied mechanics, engineers. Adelaide (Australia); 2013. p. 39–57.
2. Kinloch · 1987
3. Effects of bondline flaws on the damage tolerance of composite scarf joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.017 ↗
4. Tsai, HC, Alper, J, and Barrett, D. Failure analysis of composite bonded joints. In: Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit. Atlanta (GA, United States); 2000.10.2514/6.2000-1428 ↗
5. Compact solutions for the corner singularity in bonded lap joints10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00032-9 ↗
6. On the design methodology of scarf repairs to composite laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.045 ↗
7. Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
8. Progressive damage modelling
9. Effects of adherend thickness and taper on adhesive bond strength measured by portable pull-off tests10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.03.014 ↗
10. Plastic yielding of a film adhesive under multiaxial stresses10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00033-0 ↗
11. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
12. Callus · 2011
13. Lee, M, Wang, CH, Yeo, E, and Janardhana, M. Effects of effect of off-normal loading on the bond strength measurement of bonded repairs. In: Proceedings of the 28th international congress of the aeronautical sciences. Brisbane; 2012.
14. Void minimization in adhesive joints10.1016/0143-7496(89)90107-3 ↗
15. ASTM. ASTM D3433-99 standard test method for fracture strength in cleavage of adhesives in bonded metal joints. In: Adhesives. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1999.
16. Boiling water and silane pre-treatment of aluminium alloys for durable adhesive bonding10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00046-9 ↗
17. ASTM. ASTM D3762-03(2010) standard test method for adhesive bonded surface durability of aluminium (wedge test). In: Adhesives. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2010.
18. On the use of laminated beams for the determination of pure and mixed-mode fracture properties of structural adhesives10.1080/00218468908030880 ↗
19. Davies · 1993
20. On the analysis and design of the end notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing10.1177/002199838602000606 ↗
21. Cohesive law and notch sensitivity of adhesive joints10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00404-9 ↗
22. The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
23. On the effective constitutive properties of a thin adhesive layer loaded in peel10.1007/s10704-006-0075-6 ↗
24. A straightforward method to obtain the cohesive laws of bonded joints under mode I loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.07.008 ↗
25. Cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode I loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
26. Shear behaviour of adhesive layers10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.036 ↗
27. Effects of bondline thickness on mode-II interfacial laws of bonded laminated composite plate10.1007/s10704-010-9571-9 ↗
28. Nonlinear interface shear fracture of end notched flexure specimens10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.011 ↗
29. Determination of cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode II loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.007 ↗
30. Stress analysis of axisymmetric butt joints loaded in torsion and tension10.1243/03093247V131001 ↗
31. Elastic analysis of adhesive butt joints10.1080/00218467608075059 ↗
32. Stress analysis and testing of parallel and tapered adhesive butt joints10.1163/156856193X00772 ↗
33. Cytec, FM300 high-shear strength modified epoxy film adhesive, C.E. materials. Havre de Grace; 2002.
34. ASM · 2001
35. Quadratic stress criterion for initiation of delamination10.1177/002199838802201205 ↗
36. Davila · 2007
37. Vogler · 2007 · 11
38. Crack growth resistance curves in strain-softening materials10.1016/0022-5096(86)90039-6 ↗
39. Camanho · 2002
40. Leone · 2012
41. Lee, M. Assessment of adhesive bonded repairs. In: Proceedings of the SAMME. Melbourne: RMIT University; 2013.