Predicting the strength of adhesively bonded joints of variable thickness using a cohesive element approach
Source abstract
Abstract
One major characteristic of bonded structures is the highly localised nature of deformation near sharp corners, ply-terminations, and ends of joints where load transfer occurs. This paper presents an investigation of the use of a cohesive zone model in predicting the strong effects of stress concentration due to varying adherend thickness on the pull-off strength measured by the Pneumatic Adhesion Tensile Testing Instrument. A comparison is made with the point-strain-at-a-distance criterion, where the plastic deformation of the adhesive is analysed using a modified Drucker–Prager/cap plasticity material model. The fracture properties of the cohesive zone model were determined using double-cantilever and end-notch flexural specimens, and the cohesive strengths were measured using tensile and lap shear tests. Comparisons with experimental results reveal that the cohesive zone model with perfectly plastic (or non-strain-softening) cohesive law provides accurate predictions of joint strengths.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams, RD and Karachalios, EF. Can we really predict accurately the strength of adhesively bonded joints? In: Proceedings of the 8th Australiasia congress on applied mechanics, engineers. Adelaide (Australia); 2013. p. 39–57.
2. Kinloch · 1987
3. Effects of bondline flaws on the damage tolerance of composite scarf joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.017 ↗
4. Tsai, HC, Alper, J, and Barrett, D. Failure analysis of composite bonded joints. In: Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit. Atlanta (GA, United States); 2000.10.2514/6.2000-1428 ↗
5. Compact solutions for the corner singularity in bonded lap joints10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00032-9 ↗
6. On the design methodology of scarf repairs to composite laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.045 ↗
7. Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
8. Progressive damage modelling
9. Effects of adherend thickness and taper on adhesive bond strength measured by portable pull-off tests10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.03.014 ↗
10. Plastic yielding of a film adhesive under multiaxial stresses10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00033-0 ↗
11. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
12. Callus · 2011
13. Lee, M, Wang, CH, Yeo, E, and Janardhana, M. Effects of effect of off-normal loading on the bond strength measurement of bonded repairs. In: Proceedings of the 28th international congress of the aeronautical sciences. Brisbane; 2012.
14. Void minimization in adhesive joints10.1016/0143-7496(89)90107-3 ↗
15. ASTM. ASTM D3433-99 standard test method for fracture strength in cleavage of adhesives in bonded metal joints. In: Adhesives. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1999.
16. Boiling water and silane pre-treatment of aluminium alloys for durable adhesive bonding10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00046-9 ↗
17. ASTM. ASTM D3762-03(2010) standard test method for adhesive bonded surface durability of aluminium (wedge test). In: Adhesives. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2010.
18. On the use of laminated beams for the determination of pure and mixed-mode fracture properties of structural adhesives10.1080/00218468908030880 ↗
19. Davies · 1993
20. On the analysis and design of the end notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing10.1177/002199838602000606 ↗
21. Cohesive law and notch sensitivity of adhesive joints10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00404-9 ↗
22. The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
23. On the effective constitutive properties of a thin adhesive layer loaded in peel10.1007/s10704-006-0075-6 ↗
24. A straightforward method to obtain the cohesive laws of bonded joints under mode I loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.07.008 ↗
25. Cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode I loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
26. Shear behaviour of adhesive layers10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.036 ↗
27. Effects of bondline thickness on mode-II interfacial laws of bonded laminated composite plate10.1007/s10704-010-9571-9 ↗
28. Nonlinear interface shear fracture of end notched flexure specimens10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.011 ↗
29. Determination of cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode II loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.007 ↗
30. Stress analysis of axisymmetric butt joints loaded in torsion and tension10.1243/03093247V131001 ↗
31. Elastic analysis of adhesive butt joints10.1080/00218467608075059 ↗
32. Stress analysis and testing of parallel and tapered adhesive butt joints10.1163/156856193X00772 ↗
33. Cytec, FM300 high-shear strength modified epoxy film adhesive, C.E. materials. Havre de Grace; 2002.
34. ASM · 2001
35. Quadratic stress criterion for initiation of delamination10.1177/002199838802201205 ↗
36. Davila · 2007
37. Vogler · 2007 · 11
38. Crack growth resistance curves in strain-softening materials10.1016/0022-5096(86)90039-6 ↗
39. Camanho · 2002
40. Leone · 2012
41. Lee, M. Assessment of adhesive bonded repairs. In: Proceedings of the SAMME. Melbourne: RMIT University; 2013.