Study on the effect of surface morphology on adhesion properties of polybenzimidazole adhesive bonded composite joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Surface wetting properties of polymer based composite materials play a crucial role in the achievement of better adhesive bonding. In the present work, efforts are made to evaluate the effect of surface morphology on adhesion properties of two different epoxy based carbon fiber composite materials before and after performing the atmospheric pressure plasma treatment and hand sanding. In this study, high performance thermoplastic polybenzimidazole (PBI) adhesive having a glass transition of 425 °C is used as an adhesive. PBI adhesive bonded joints were formed using M21 epoxy based and DT120 epoxy based carbon fiber composites. Experimental results demonstrate that surface morphology plays a very critical role in achieving a high lap shear strength. Due to better surface morphology, DT120/carbon composite bonded joints exhibits four times higher lap shear strength even without performing any surface treatment. Furthermore, plasma treated composite bonded joints have shown higher lap shear strength when compared to the hand sanded composite bonded joints. Lap shear strength of bonded joints is correlated with surface morphology of plasma treated and hand sanded samples. SEM analysis of treated surfaces demonstrates that plasma treatment has changed the surface morphology without damaging fibers on the surface; whereas hand sanding treatment has damaged some fibers on the surface which ultimately leads towards a weak substrate/adhesive interface and hence resulted in lower bonded joint strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Introduction to Aerospace Materials. Published by Woodhead Publishing Limited. 80 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge CB22 3HJ, UK, Adrian P. Mouritz; 2012
2. Residual Stresses in Composite Materials. Shokrieh M, (Editor). 80 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge CB22 3HJ, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2014
3. Polymer Composites in the Aerospace Industry. Irving PE, Soutis, C, (Editors). 80 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge, CB22 3HJ, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2015
4. Eckert W. Improvement of adhesion on polymer film, foil and paperboard by flame treatment. In: Proceedings of TAPPI European PLACE Conference; 2003
5. Duncan B, Mera R, Leatherdale D, Taylor M, Musgrove R, Techniques for characterising the wetting, coating and spreading of adhesives on surfaces, NPL Report, DEPC MPR 020; 2005
6. Treatment of composite surfaces for adhesive bonding10.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9 ↗
7. Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0 ↗
8. The fundamentals of adhesive joint design and construction10.1016/S0026-0576(08)80314-5 ↗
9. Rotheiser · 1999
10. Role of plasma surface treatments on wetting and adhesion10.4236/eng.2010.26052 ↗
11. Polybenzimidazole Prepreg: improved elevated temperature properties with autoclave processability10.1088/0954-0083/3/3/001 ↗
12. Ebnesajjad · 2011
13. Adhesive bonding for high performance materials10.1007/BF00136795 ↗