journal article·2004-06

Stiffness prediction of the double lap shear joint. Part1: Analytical solution

Xinran (Sharon) Xiao, Peter.H. Foss, Jessica.A. Schroeder

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical solution for the in-plane stiffness response of adhesively bonded double lap shear (DLS) joints. The solution was first derived for a model with the consideration of shear deformation of the adhesive (Model 1) and then was extended to two other simplified models, where the adhesive was modeled as matrix of rigid links (Model 2) or as a line of rigid links (Model 3). Models 2 and 3 represent two common types of simplifications in current finite element structural analysis of bonded joints. The solution for Model 1 was verified with test results. Errors resulting from the simplifications of Models 2 and 3 were estimated. The effect of joint geometries and material properties on the joint stiffness was investigated through a parametric study of the solution for Model 1.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Botkin ME. Optimal design of a carbon fiber automotive front structure. SAMPE-ACCE-DOE-SPE, 2000. p. 100–10.
2. Nardini D, McGregor IJ, Seeds AD. Analysis and testing of adhesively bonded aluminum structural components. SAE Technical Paper Series, 900795, 1990.10.4271/900795 ↗
3. McGregor IJ, Nardini D, Gao Y, Meadows DJ. The development of a joint design approach for aluminum automotive structures. SAE Technical Paper Series, 922112, 1992.10.4271/922112 ↗
4. Analysis of stiffness of adhesive joints in car bodies10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00895-0 ↗
5. Xiao XR, Foss PH, Schroeder JA. Stiffness prediction of the double lap shear joint. Part 2: Finite element modeling Int J Adhes Adhes, accepted.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.10.004 ↗
6. Die Niektraftverteilung in Zugbeanspruchtenmit Konstanten Laschenquerschriften
7. The stresses in cemented joints10.1115/1.4009336 ↗
8. Stress analysis of adhesively bonded lap joints10.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
9. Adams RD, Peppiatt NA. Stress analysis of lap joints in fiber reinforced composite materials. In: Fiber reinforced plastics. ICE: London; 1977. p. 45.10.1680/frmdaea.00513.0007 ↗
10. The efficient design of adhesive bonded joints10.1080/00218467508075049 ↗
11. A theory for elastic stresses in adhesive bonded lap joint10.1093/qjmam/30.4.415 ↗
12. Hart-Smith LJ. In: Kinloch AJ, editor. Development in adhesives—2. London: Applied Science Publishers; 1981.
13. The strength of glued joints10.1108/eb031117 ↗
14. Stress distribution in bonded joints10.1177/002199837100500308 ↗
15. A comparison of numerous lap joint theories for adhesively bonded joints10.1080/00218469108030435 ↗
16. Adams · 1984
17. Reddy JN, Roy S. Finite element analysis of adhesive joints. In: Lee L, editor. Adhesive bonding. New York: Plenum Press; 1991.10.1007/978-1-4757-9006-1_13 ↗
18. Improved theoretical solutions for adhesive lap joints10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00097-8 ↗
19. Stiffness behavior due to fracture in adhesively bonded composite-to-aluminum joints, I theoretical model10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00013-5 ↗
20. Stiffness behavior due to fracture in adhesively bonded composite-to-aluminum joints, II experimental10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00014-7 ↗
21. Li S. Private communication, April 2002.