journal article·2001-01

Evaluation of the cure kinetics of the wood/pMDI bondline

David P. Harper, Michael P. Wolcott, Timothy G. Rials

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Micro-dielectric analysis (μDEA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to monitor cure of polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (pMDI) resin with wood strands in a saturated steam environment. A first-order autocatalyzed kinetic model was employed to determine kinetic parameters. The kinetics were found to follow an Arrhenius relation. A single ramp DSC technique and μDEA produced models that predicted similar results at higher cure temperatures, but the μDEA-based model predicts a longer cure time at low temperatures. The isothermal μDEA method yields higher activation energies and Arrhenius frequency factors than models based on single DSC ramps. A modification to ASTM E698 was made to conform to the assumption of autocatalyzed kinetics. The modified ASTM E698 method predicted an earlier end of cure than the μDEA-based models and was in agreement with DSC results obtained by partial cure experiments. The activation energies and frequency factors for the different cure monitoring methods are sensitive to different stages of cure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer crystallization and properties · Synthesis and properties of polymers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Harper DP, Wolcott MP, Rials TG. J Adhesion, in press.
2. Johns WE. Wood adhesives and technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. 1983. p. 75–96.
3. Weaver FW, Owen NL. Proceedings of Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium, Rotorua, New Zealand, 1992. p. 143–153.
4. Galbraith CJ, Newman WH. Proceedings of Pacific Rim Bio-Based Composites Symposium, Rotorua, New Zealand, November, 1992. p. 130–142.
5. Wendler SL, Ni J, Frazier CE. Proceedings of Wood Adhesives 1995 Symposium, Madison, WI, 1995. p. 37–42.
6. Rosthauser JW, Haider KW, Hunt RN, Gustavich WS. Proceedings of 30th International Particleboard/Composite Symposium, Pullman, WA, 1997. p. 161–75.
7. Humphrey PE. Proceedings of Wood Adhesive in 1990: Status and Needs, Pullman, WA, 1990. p. 86–90.
8. Geimer RL, Follensbee RA, Christiansen AW, Koutsky JA, Myers GE. Proceedings of Twenty-fourth International Particle board/Composite Symposium, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 1990. p. 65–83.
9. Humphrey · Test Eval · 1989 · 17 · 32310.1520/JTE11138J ↗
10. Chelak W, Neman WH. Proceedings of Twenty-fifth International Particle board/Composite Symposium, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 1990. p. 177–84.
11. Wang · Polymer · 1994 · 36 · 568510.1016/S0032-3861(05)80042-4 ↗
12. Prime RB. Thermal characterization of polymeric materials. New York: Academic Press, 1981. p. 435–569.10.1016/B978-0-12-703780-6.50010-9 ↗
13. Provder T, Holsworth R, Grentzer T, Kline S. Advances in chemistry series polymer characterization: spectroscopic, chromatographic, and physical instrumental methods. Washington, DC: ACS, 1983. p. 233–53.10.1021/ba-1983-0203.ch013 ↗
14. Lam · Polym Compos · 1987 · 8 · 42710.1002/pc.750080609 ↗
15. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. E698-79 Method. 1979; 14.02: 601.
16. Doyle · J. Appl Polym Sci · 1961 · 5 · 28510.1002/app.1961.070051506 ↗