journal article·2005-04

Investigation and demonstration of the durability of air plasma pre-treatment on polypropylene automotive bumpers

Rebecca Stewart, Vannessa Goodship, Felicity Guild, Martyn Green, Jeff Farrow

Publisher page

Abstract

Higher utilisation of low-density materials such as polymers and polymer composites is a pre-requisite for the lightweight vehicle of the future. Of the commodity polymers polypropylene (PP) is by far the most attractive for the automotive industry. Additionally, PP can be utilised as a glass or mineral filled composite which may be used for semi-structural applications. A major problem is that PP (along with other polyolefins) has a non-polar surface chemistry which means the wetting characteristics of components made from this material are poor. Ultimately, this will result in poor adhesion of paints, coatings or adhesive bonding products. This problem has been overcome in the majority of instances by treating the surface of the substrate in order to alter the surface chemistry. PP has found extensive use as films and flat sheets and hence certain techniques such as flame and corona have been favoured despite both having problems of heterogeneous or patchy treatment across a surface. However, for complex 3-D automotive shapes, such as bumpers, these methods are less useful. While flame treatment for example is widely used it has several disadvantages in a commercial volume production environment which all centre around the potential for the part to undergo overtreatment, incipient melting or melting during machine stops etc., as well as the hazards associated with combustible gas. An alternative method is atmospheric plasma pre-treatment. This work has investigated the effect of a forced air plasma pre-treatment on surface chemistry and bond strength of a commercial grade polypropylene material. The plasma head was attached to a robot arm which makes it highly suited to continuous production environments and can treat complex surfaces. A range of translation speeds were investigated and the surface chemistry and topography of the treated surfaces were examined using atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The processing was further optimised by single lap-shear testing. An optimised set of parameters was used to pre-treat and bond a full size automotive bumper assembly with a polyurethane (PU) adhesive. Bumpers were then subjected to a standard automotive range of climate conditioning as well as soaking at -20degreesC and 70degreesC before front centre impact testing. Parts pre-treated and bonded using this pre-treatment and adhesive system, successfully passed all the required standard automotive impact tests. For added benefit, it was also found that the open time of the pre-treatment was 1 week depending on storage conditions. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Long JW. Painting of polypropylene. Proceedings of Polypropylene in Automotive Applications, 1992. p. 1–3.
2. Physiochemical properties of surface-modified polymers10.1163/156856195X00536 ↗
3. The improvement in adhesion of polyurethane–polypropylene composites by short term exposure of polypropylene to low and atmospheric plasmas
4. Automotive paints
5. Effects of the chromic acid etching on polypropylene polymer surfaces10.1163/156856195X00284 ↗
6. Surface properties and adhesion mechanisms of graft polypropylene10.1007/BF00544513 ↗
7. Datta · 1996
8. Effects of solvents on the surface properties of oxygen plasma treated polypropylene films10.1163/156856197X00642 ↗
9. Adhesion mechanisms on aluminium, aluminium oxide and silicon oxide on biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP), poly ethylene terephthalate (PET), and poly vinyl chloride (PVC)10.1163/156856197X00336 ↗
10. Plasma treatment and adhesion properties of a rubber modified polypropylene10.1163/156856196X00698 ↗
11. Adhesion mechanisms of silica layers on plasma treated polymers. Part II, Polypropylene10.1163/156856196X00265 ↗
12. Adhesive strength study and surface analysis using gas phase chemical reactions of atmospheric pressure plasma treated polypropylene10.1080/00218469808009964 ↗
13. Adhesion characteristics of plasma treated polypropylene to mild steel10.1163/156856193X00943 ↗
14. Surface analysis and adhesion of polypropylene after low pressure plasma treatment10.1002/sia.740160187 ↗
15. ASTM D3163-73. Standard test method for determining strength of adhesively bonded rigid plastic lap-shear joints in shear by tension loading. ASTM; 1991.
16. Wang X, Guild FJ, Adams RJ. Adhesive bonding of polypropylene. Proceedings of SAE 6, Bristol, 2001, p. 195–8.
17. Ford Motor Co. World wide and European engineering material specifications. Procedure 1 FLTM BQ 104-07, volume WSK-M98P7, 1990.
18. Beevers A, Thernoe J, Njegic A. Corona discharge pre-treatment of surfaces for bonded joints. Sixth International Conference on Structural Adhesives Engineering. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1986. p 221–7.
19. Analysis of air-corona-treated polypropylene and poly(ethylene terephthalate) fils by contact-angle measurements and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy10.1163/156856192X00764 ↗
20. Surface modification of polymeric materials by atmospheric plasma treatment10.1016/S0300-9440(97)00117-3 ↗