Bending strength of adhesively-bonded 3D-printed polymer structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Often referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing or 3DP, additive manufacturing (AM) is a growing alternative to conventional fabrication methods such as injection moulding and machining. Rapid prototyping, improved material efficiency, and the ability to create extremely complex geometries are some of its key advantages. Size constraints in AM components, however, continue to be a significant drawback, requiring the joining of smaller printed components to produce complex structures. This study uses additively manufactured polymeric adherends, namely Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-modified (PETG), and Polylactic Acid (PLA), to investigate the structural behaviour of single-lap joints (SLJ) under four-point bending (4PB). Araldite® 2015 and Sikaforce® 7752 adhesives were used to obtain the bonded joints. Experimental testing was used to determine the adherends’ mechanical characteristics, such as their elastic modulus, plastic deformation characteristics, and fracture behaviour. Failure modes, maximum load ( P m ), joint stiffness ( k max ), and energy absorption ( E max ) were assessed by means of an experimental campaign. The results were compared to predictions made by a Cohesive Zone Model (CZM). The findings highlight how adherend material, adhesive type, and overlap length ( L O ) all significantly affect joint performance. The Sikaforce® 7752/PLA combination exhibited the highest P m and E max (161 N and 1.58 J, respectively), while PLA bonded with the Araldite® 2015 showed the highest k max (10.29 N/mm), in all cases with the highest L O studied of 20 mm.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography
2. Gibson · 2021 · vol. 17
3. 2012
4. Topology optimization for hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing incorporating dynamic process planning10.1016/j.cma.2024.117270 ↗
5. Review of intelligence for additive and subtractive manufacturing: current status and future prospects10.3390/mi14030508 ↗
6. Review: the impact of metal additive manufacturing on the aerospace industry10.3390/met9121286 ↗
7. 3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: a review10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102 ↗
8. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
9. Additive manufacturing—Past, present, and the future
10. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
11. Waste to wonder to explore possibilities with recycled materials in 3D printing10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167109 ↗
12. Kumar · 2023 · 1
13. A review of additive manufacturing
14. Current status and challenges of powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing: literature review10.3390/met13020424 ↗
15. Directed energy deposition processes
16. A review article on FDM process parameters in 3D printing for composite materials10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.385 ↗
17. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics
18. Topology optimization of additively manufactured adherends for increased adhesive bond strength10.3390/ma18102170 ↗
19. Petrie · 2007
20. Adams · 2005
21. Ebnesajjad · 2014
22. Evaluation of different modelling conditions in the cohesive zone analysis of single-lap bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2017.1307107 ↗
23. Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints
24. Failure and fracture in adhesively bonded 3D-printed joints: an overview on the current trends10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107574 ↗
25. Adhesive bonding of CFRP with a 3D-printed short-fiber composite: an experimental study on the effects of geometry and adhesive system on joint performance10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112155 ↗
26. Evaluation of polymeric 3D printed adhesively bonded joints: effect of joint morphology and mechanical interlocking10.1108/RPJ-09-2021-0259 ↗
27. Effects of steps on the load bearing capacity of 3D-printed single lap joints10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.032 ↗
28. Surface quality enhancement of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed samples based on the selection of critical printing parameters10.3390/ma11081382 ↗
29. Fracture behavior of intact and defected 3D-printed parts10.1016/j.prostr.2021.03.017 ↗
30. Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025 ↗
31. 2014 · 1
32. Ribeiro, T.F.R., R.D.S.G. Campilho, R.F.R. Pinto, and R.J.B. Rocha, Structural behaviour of adhesive bonds in 3D printed adherends. J Adhes Sci Technol: p. 1-25.10.1080/01694243.2024.2391012 ↗
33. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
34. Strength and fracture characterization of a novel polyurethane adhesive for the automotive industry10.1520/JTE20150335 ↗
35. Effects of adherends' misalignment on the strength of single-lap joints under 3-point and 4-point bending tests10.1007/s00170-022-10434-6 ↗