The effects of using intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersink on the strength of adhesively bonded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of two innovative methods, namely, intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersinking, on the strength of single lap joints (SLJs). In the former method, metal inserts are strategically integrated within the adhesive layer, while the latter involves the application of countersinks on the adherends to create conical depressions for adhesive application. The metal inserts and countersink samples were fabricated using a 5-axis CNC milling machine. Subsequently, the joints were produced by subjecting the samples to 0.15 MPa pressure and 70 °C temperature for 120 min with the aid of a hot press. Tensile tests were conducted on single lap joints (SLJs) featuring five different configurations of intermittent metal part reinforcement joints (IMRJs) with varying sizes and positions of reinforcements, as well as six countersunk reinforced joints (CRJs) with different orientations of countersinks, all while keeping the width and overlap length constant. A two-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the IMRJ was constructed using ABAQUS software, incorporating cohesive zone elements to simulate the behavior of the adhesive layer (DP 460). The model`s accuracy was confirmed through experimental verification. Additionally, fractographic analysis of the failure surfaces of both types of joints was carried out. The inclusion of IMRJs and CRJs in the SLJs increased their load-carrying capacity by more than 10 % and 30 %, respectively.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Enhancement of stiffness and load bearing capacity of damaged mortar beams with CFRP patches10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.074 ↗
2. The fracture load analysis of different material thickness in adhesively bonded joints subjected to fully reversed bending fatigue load10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102984 ↗
3. The effect of stepped notches and recesses on joint strength in adhesive bonded joints: experimental and numerical analysis10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103364 ↗
4. A new geometry for improving the strength of single lap joints using adherend notching technique10.1080/00218464.2020.1724787 ↗
5. Effect of spew adhesive and beveling substrate geometrical shape on stresses in a bonded single lap joint10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114049 ↗
6. Behaviour of Bi-adhesive joints10.1163/016942409X12561252291982 ↗
7. Viscoelastic model to evaluate the shear stresses in the bi-adhesively bonded lap joints10.1007/s40430-022-03839-7 ↗
8. A study on 3-D stress distributions in the bi-adhesively bonded T-joints10.1016/j.apm.2013.06.008 ↗
9. Experimental and numerical strength analysis of double lap joints subjected to tensile loads10.3139/120.110521 ↗
10. The effect of the inclination Angle on inverse Z joints in composite materials bonded with adhesives10.3139/120.110422 ↗
11. Effect of different joint angles on the mechanical strength of adhesive-bonded scarf and double butt–lap joints10.1515/mt-2021-2054 ↗
12. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
13. A novel dissimilar single-lap joint with interfacial stiffness improvement10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112741 ↗
14. On fracture characteristics of adhesive joints with dissimilar materials–An experimental study using digital image correlation (DIC) technique10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.018 ↗
15. Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites10.1515/mt-2021-2038 ↗
16. Metallic fiber-reinforced adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.005 ↗
17. The effect of metallic fiber geometry and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical behavior of aluminum fiber-reinforced composite adhesive joints
18. The effect of chemical etching and nanostructure additive epoxy coating technique on adhesion strength in aluminum joints bonded with nanostructure additive adhesive10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103584 ↗
19. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer nanocomposite adhesive joints reinforced with aligned carbon nanofillers10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112814 ↗
20. Toughening epoxy adhesives with multi-walled carbon nanotubes10.1080/00218464.2016.1224184 ↗
21. The fracture load analysis of different support patches in adhesively bonded single-lap joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102653 ↗
22. 2019
23. Influence of carbon and glass fiber reinforced composite adhesive on the strength of adhesively bonded joints10.1515/mt-2022-0284 ↗
24. Effect of nanocomposites rate on the crack propagation in the adhesive of single lap joint subjected to tension
25. Experimental and numerical investigation of transverse shear behavior of glass-fibre composites with embedded vascular channel10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112697 ↗
26. Failure behaviour of the adhesive layer and angle ply composite adherends in single lap joints: a numerical study10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.010 ↗
27. Investigation of internal step and metal part reinforcement on joint strength in the adhesively bonded joint: experimental and numerical analysis10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102613 ↗
28. 1992
29. Variation of adhesive strength in single lap joint (SLJ) with surface irregularities10.12691/ajme-7-2-2 ↗
30. The effect of the adherend width on the strength of adhesively bonded single-lap joint: experimental and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.022 ↗