journal article·2022-12

Combined effect of surface pretreatment and nanomaterial reinforcement on the adhesion strength of aluminium joints

Elanur Ozun, Reyhan Ceylan, Mustafa Özgür Bora, Onur Çoban, Togayhan Kutluk

Publisher page

Abstract

Nowadays, it is known that adhesive and cohesive forces should be developed in order to improve the mechanical performance of adhesive joints. In this context, while the adhesive forces are improved with surface pre -treatments applied to the adherends, the adhesive and cohesive forces are improved with the nanomaterial reinforcement to the adhesive. For this purpose, in this study, AA7075-T6 aluminium alloy adherends were combined with epoxy adhesive as a single lap joint. As a preliminary study, abrading and FPL-etching (Forest Products Laboratory) surface pretreatments were applied to aluminium alloy adherends and after two different surface pretreatments, the changing surface morphology (with optical microscope, contact angle, profilometer measurements) and shear strength were compared. With abrading and FPL-etching surface pretreatments, an increase of 40.83% and 69.63%, respectively, was determined in the shear strength compared to untreated adhesive joints. After the preliminary study, in order to increase the mechanical performance of the adhesive joints, nano sized ANP (alumina nanopowder), MWCNT (multiwalled carbon nanotubes) and SNP (silica nanopowder) were added to the adhesive. Thus, it was investigated how the combined effect of different surface pretreatments and nanomaterial types at various reinforcement ratios changed the shear strength of the adhesive joints. After shear tests, significant increase in shear strength was observed in FPL-etched adhesive joints compared to abraded adhesive joints in all reinforcement nanomaterial types and reinforcement ratios. And also, significant improvements in the shear strength of adhesive joints were determined in all types of nanomaterial reinforcements. The highest shear strength was obtained at 10.0 wt % SNP reinforcement with 104.32% improvement in FPL-etched adhesive joints compared to nonreinforced FPL-etched adhesive joints. The evalu-ation of shear strength was supported by the failure images taken from the fracture surfaces after shear tests, and it was determined that the failure type was changed from adhesive to cohesive with nanomaterial reinforcement compared to nonreinforced adhesive joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. A simple surface treatment and characterization of AA 6061 aluminum alloy surface for adhesive bonding applications10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.091 ↗
2. Design and durability of titanium adhesive joints for marine applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.04.003 ↗
3. Effect of surface treatment on adhesively bonded aluminium-aluminium joints regarding aeronautical structures10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.010 ↗
4. Broughton · 2001 · 1
5. Milling as a method of surface pre-treatment of steel for adhesive bonding10.1080/01694243.2016.1191585 ↗
6. Contact angle and wettability of hybrid surface-treated metal adherends10.1080/01694243.2012.727154 ↗
7. The effect of laser surface treatment on the adhesive bonding performance of aluminum alloy10.1088/1742-6596/1605/1/012136 ↗
8. Petrie · 1999
9. Effect of surface pre-treatment and temperature on the adhesive strength of hybrid aluminum joints
10. Effect of grooves on the strength of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.07.005 ↗
11. Nanostructured epoxy adhesives: a review10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.06.028 ↗
12. A review on mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.742 ↗
13. Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues10.1038/nature12806 ↗
14. Enhanced bonded aircraft repair using nano-modified adhesives10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.052 ↗
15. The effects of graphene nanostructure reinforcement on the adhesive method and the graphene reinforcement ratio on the failure load in adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.039 ↗
16. Lap shear strength and thermal stability of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A/epoxy novolac adhesives with nanoreinforcing fillers10.1002/app.40017 ↗
17. Alüminyum oksit ve titanyum dioksit partikül takviyeli yapıştırıcılarla birleştirilmiş bağlantıların mekanik Özelliklerinin deneysel olarak belirlenmesi
18. Toughening structural adhesives via nano and micro-phase inclusions10.1080/00218460309551 ↗
19. High performance epoxy nanocomposite adhesive: effect of nanofillers on adhesive strength, curing and degradation kinetics10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.03.013 ↗
20. Nanoreinforced epoxy and adhesive joints incorporating boron nitride nanotubes10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.03.008 ↗
21. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
22. The role of alumina nanoparticles in epoxy adhesives10.1007/s11051-010-0130-0 ↗
23. Effect of reinforcements at different scales on mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives and adhesive joints: a review10.1080/00218464.2018.1452736 ↗
24. Recent processes for the production of alumina nano-particles
25. Effect of alumina nanoparticles on shear strength of epoxy adhesive: experimental and finite element analysis
26. On adhesive properties of nano-silica/epoxy bonded single-lap joints10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.055 ↗
27. ASTM D1002-99 Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joints adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (Metal-to-Metal), 100 barr harbor drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
28. Henkel, Loctite EA 9396 AERO Technical Process Bulletin, https://www.aeroconsultants.ch/view/data/3285/Produkte/Henkel%20Adhesive/LOCTITE%20EA%209396%20AERO.pdf.
29. Standard practice for surface wettability of coatings
30. 2012
31. Effect of surface pre-treatment on surface characteristics and adhesive bond strength of aluminium alloy10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.012 ↗
32. Effect of combined surface treatment on the adhesion performance of aluminium-lithium alloy10.1080/01694243.2019.1613947 ↗
33. Effects of surface pre-treatment and void content on GLARE laminate process characteristics10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.017 ↗
34. Effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.023 ↗
35. A comparative study on the effect of CNT or alumina nanoparticles on the tensile properties of epoxy nanocomposites10.1007/s13369-018-3516-4 ↗
36. Effect of different carbon nano-fillers on rheological properties and lap shear strength of epoxy adhesive joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.12.003 ↗
37. Dispersion, interfacial interaction and re-agglomeration of functionalized carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.028 ↗
38. Mechanical properties of adhesively single lap-bonded joints reinforced with multi- walled carbon nanotubes and silica nanoparticles10.1080/00218464.2016.1187069 ↗
39. Property improvements of in situ epoxy nanocomposites with reduced interparticle distance at high nanosilica content10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.009 ↗
40. Study of the effect of substrate roughness on adhesive joints by SEM image analysis10.1163/156856106777144345 ↗
41. Influence of Al2O3 nanoreinforcement on the adhesion and thermomechanical properties for epoxy adhesive10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.007 ↗
42. Experimental analysis on the single-lap joints bonded by a nanocomposite adhesives which obtained by adding nanostructures10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.046 ↗
43. The effect of graphene oxide nano-platelets on fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints10.1111/ffe.12612 ↗