Substrate geometry effect on the strength of repaired plates: Combined XFEM and CZM approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Aluminum alloys are commonly used in aeronautical applications because of their specific strength and improved corrosion resistance. These structures, during their service, are exposed to various loading cycles, eventually leading to failure at the loci of geometric discontinuities. Repairing by metal or composite patch bonding is widespread to extend the structures’ life by limiting stress concentrations and delaying crack initiation. This work consists of a numerical study, validated by experimental test data, to assess the effect of a central circular notch in an aluminum plate, either reinforced or not by an adhesively bonded composite patch, on the global tensile response of the structure. The constitutive law of the aluminum and adhesive is assumed nonlinear and follows Von Mises equivalent stress flow theory with a hardening variable in incremental form. Damage initiation in the aluminum alloy is modeled by the XFEM (eXtended Finite Element Method), using the maximum principal stress criterion (MAXPS) for damage initiation prediction. Damage evolution is based on the energy approach. The adhesive layer was modeled by CZM (Cohesive Zone Model). A good agreement was found between the experimental results of the tensile curves of the repaired and unrepaired plates with those resulting from numerical modeling. Once the numerical model was validated, several parameters werenumerically studied, namely the shape of the composite patch, the size of the notch, the nature of the adhesive and repair mode by single and double patch, to reduce maximum stress of the damaged area and provide maximum repair efficiency.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Proposed through-life management approaches for adhesively bonded repair of primary structures10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.001 ↗
2. Repair of damage in pipes using bonded GFRP patches10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115875 ↗
3. The fatigue repairing evaluation of hybrid woven composite patch with 2D&3D styles bonded Al-alloy plates under UV and thermal curing10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107743 ↗
4. Echtermeyer · 2014
5. Numerical investigation of composite patch repair of inclined cracked panel using XFEM10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.643 ↗
6. Pantelakis · 2020
7. Joining and repair of aircraft composite structures
8. Stress distribution in a 2024-T3 aluminum plate with a circular notch, repaired by a graphite/epoxy composite patch10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.05.004 ↗
9. 3D numerical investigation of aluminum 2024-T3 plate repaired with asymmetric and symmetric composite patch10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.153 ↗
10. Optimisation of the sizes of bonded composite repair in aircraft structures10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.025 ↗
11. Effect of patch thickness on the repair performance of bonded composite repair in cracked aluminum plate10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.255 ↗
12. Design and optimization of bonded patch repairs of laminated composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.048 ↗
13. Towards optimization of patch shape on the performance of bonded composite repair using FEM10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.049 ↗
14. Optimum design of symmetric composite patch repair to centre cracked metallic sheet10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00005-2 ↗
15. Composite repairs to rib stiffened panels10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00046-5 ↗
16. Composite repairs to cracks in thick metallic components10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00108-1 ↗
17. Bonded composite repair of fatigue-cracked primary aircraft structure10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00011-8 ↗
18. Baker · 2012
19. Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of asymmetric repaired aluminium panels with glass/epoxy composite patches10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.032 ↗
20. Evaluation of different modelling conditions in the cohesive zone analysis of single-lap bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2017.1307107 ↗
21. Experimental and numerical study of repair techniques for panels with geometrical discontinuities10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.005 ↗
22. Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of asymmetric repaired aluminum panels with glass/epoxy composite patches10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.032 ↗
23. Fatigue life improvement of cracked aluminum 6061-T6 plates repaired by composite patches10.3390/ma14061421 ↗
24. Nonlinear stress analysis of v-notched aluminum plates repaired with the wet patch technique10.1080/00218464.2017.1381021 ↗
25. Fatigue crack growth behavior of cracked aluminum plate repaired with composite patch10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00095-8 ↗
26. Numerical prediction for effects of fiber orientation on perforation resistance behaviors of patch-repaired composite panel subjected to projectile impact10.1016/j.tws.2019.106325 ↗
27. Analysis of the effect of modifying the thickness of a damaged and repaired plate by composite patch on the J-Integral; effect of bonding defects10.1007/s40430-020-02515-y ↗
28. Effect of fiber orientation angle on patch repaired composite plates10.1515/mt-2020-0074 ↗
29. Effect of the composite patch beveling on the reduction of stresses in 2024-T3 Aluminum structure damaged and repaired by composite, hybrid patch repair
30. Analysis of the presence of bonding defects on the fracture behavior of a damaged plate repaired by composite patch
31. Optimum design of symmetric composite patch repair to centre cracked metallic sheet10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00005-2 ↗
32. Influence of water ingress onto the crack propagation rate in a AA2024-T3 plate repaired by a carbon/epoxy patch10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.010 ↗
33. Comparison of double and single bonded repairs to symmetric composite structures: a numerical analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.005 ↗
34. Barot « Numerical investigation of composite patch repair of inclined cracked panel using XFEM
35. Effect of humidity absorption by the adhesive on the performances of bonded composite repairs in aircraft structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.028 ↗
36. Modelling of a patch repair to a thin cracked sheet10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00088-5 ↗
37. Duong · 2010
38. Russell · 1992 · 1
39. A self-healing carbon fibre reinforced polymer for aerospace applications10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.013 ↗
40. Davis · 2010 · 15
41. 3D numerical investigation of aluminum 2024-T3 plate repaired with asymmetric and symmetric composite patch10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.153 ↗
42. Numerical modeling of adhesively bonded composite patch repair of cracked aluminum panels with concept of CZM and XFEM
43. Debonding of adhesively bonded composite patch repairs of cracked steel members10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.004 ↗
44. Modeling and validation of composite patch repair to cracked thick and thin metallic panels10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.007 ↗
45. Debonding of CFRP-to-steel joints with CFRP delamination10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.100 ↗
46. Modeling of cracked thick metallic structure with bonded composite patch repair using three-layer technique10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00025-2 ↗
47. Progressive damage modelling of bonded composite repairs10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.01.004 ↗
48. Delamination effects on cracked steel members reinforced by prestressed composite patch10.1016/S0167-8442(02)00138-6 ↗
49. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
50. Crack growth and debonding analysis of an aluminum pipe repaired by composite patch under fatigue loading10.1016/j.tws.2016.12.023 ↗
51. Using CZM and XFEM to predict the damage to aluminum notched plates reinforced with a composite patch10.2140/jomms.2020.15.185 ↗
52. Damage of bonded, riveted and hybrid (bonded/riveted) joints, Experimental and numerical study using CZM and XFEM methods
53. Ever J · 1998