Effect of the surface morphology over the fatigue performance of metallic single lap-shear joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect provided by the state of the surface on the quality of the adhesion, as well as the sensitivity of the position of the locus of failure to the surface morphology, is known to be one of the most crucial issue to be addressed when evaluating the capability of the bonded joint to withstand any mechanical stress. Therefore, the need for the substrates to undergo a pre-treatment before being bonded is to be considered. In this work, different pre-treatments were selected to be applied over aluminum and stainless steel adherents’ surfaces with the goal to produce single lap joints to undergo cyclic loading until complete failure. In particular, the experimental campaign aimed to correlate the morphology generated by the different surface pre-treatment (laser ablation, grit blasting and simple degreasing) with the quality of the fatigue performance, measured as the number of cycles to failure. Result of this research shows that the surface morphology generated by the laser ablation was able to reduce or avoid interfacial failures, leading to an increase of the fatigue performances if compared with grit blasted and degreased joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Kinloch · 1987
2. Environmental effect on the fatigue degradation of adhesive joints: a review10.1080/00218464.2016.1179117 ↗
3. Mostovoy · 1975 · 9B
4. Free-edge stress intensity factor for a bonded ductile layer subjected to shear10.1115/1.2900863 ↗
5. Compact solutions for the corner singularity in bonded lap joints10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00032-9 ↗
6. Evaluation of fatigue strength of adhesively bonded single and single step double lap joints based on stress singularity parameters10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00111-8 ↗
7. An investigation into the crack initiation and propagation behavior of bonded single-lap joints using backface strain10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.07.008 ↗
8. A backface strain technique for detecting fatigue crack initiation in adhesive joints10.1080/00218469508009975 ↗
9. Fatigue life and backface strain predictions in adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.001 ↗
10. Fatigue performance of metallic beam strengthened with a bonded CFRP plate10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.003 ↗
11. Fatigue life evaluation of structural adhesives for automotive applications10.1016/0143-7496(92)90003-E ↗
12. Fatigue behaviour and damage evolution of single lap bonded joints in composite material10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.026 ↗
13. Predicting the service-life of adhesively-bonded joints10.1023/A:1007669219149 ↗
14. An innovative approach to fatigue disbond propagation in adhesive joints10.1163/156856196X00346 ↗
15. Effect of disbond propagation on the reflected spectra of CFBG sensors embedded within the bondline of composite bonded joints10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.79-82.2067 ↗
16. Influence of mechanical surface treatment on fatigue life of bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2015.1122531 ↗
17. Effect of grooves on the strength of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.07.005 ↗
18. Adherend surface morphology and its influence on the peel strength of adhesive joints bonded with modified phenolic and epoxy structural adhesives10.1016/0143-7496(94)90017-5 ↗
19. Effect of surface roughness on the strength of cleavage joints10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00059-8 ↗
20. Influence of surface macroroughness on the durability of epoxide-aluminium joints10.1016/0143-7496(95)91628-J ↗
21. Evaluation of mechanical interlock effect on adhesion strength of polymer-metal interfaces using micro-patterned surface topography10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.004 ↗
22. Surface roughness and bond strength of adhesives10.1080/00218467208072208 ↗
23. Adhesion of polyethylene to metals: the role of surface topography10.1080/00218467908544624 ↗
24. The effects of some anions on metastable pitting of 3161 stainless steel10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00031-2 ↗
25. Influence of the surface finish on the shear strength of structural adhesive joints and application criteria in manufacturing processes10.1080/00218460902880164 ↗
26. The effects of grit-blasting on surface properties for adhesion10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00061-X ↗
27. Effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.023 ↗
28. Effect of surface roughness on the performance of adhesive joints under static and cyclic loading10.1080/00218464.2010.482430 ↗
29. Study on the fatigue strength of AA 6082-T6 adhesive lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.009 ↗
30. Failure mechanisms in adhesively bonded aluminium: an XPS and PEELS study10.1002/sia.2651 ↗
31. Study on the role of laser surface irradiation on damage and decohesion of Al/epoxy joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.03.002 ↗
32. Surface treatment for adhesive-bonded joints by excimer laser10.1016/1359-835X(96)88890-7 ↗
33. Effect of laser ablation surface treatment on performance of adhesive-bonded aluminum alloys10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.051 ↗
34. Influence on the strength and ageing resistance of aluminium joints by laser pre-treatment and surface modification10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.009 ↗
35. Durability assessment of laser treated aluminium bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.017 ↗
36. Influence of laser treatment parameters on the mode I strain energy release rate of aluminium double cantilever beam joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.023 ↗
37. Fatigue behaviour of hybrid clinch-bonded and self-piercing rivet bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2018.1552586 ↗
38. Smith · 1998
39. Surface roughness at aluminium parts sand blasting
40. A study on the influence of surface laser texturing on the adhesive strength of bonded joints in aluminium alloys10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.123 ↗