journal article·2016-03

Experimental and numerical analysis on the strength of 2060 Al–Li alloy adhesively bonded T joints

Xiaohong Zhan, Cheng Gu, Hongliang Wu, Hongbing Liu, Jicheng Chen, Jie Chen, Yanhong Wei

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract T joint is the most widely used joint in civil aircraft. The strength of the adhesively bonded T joint is influenced by the dimension of the joint, the size of the adherend and the adhesive bondline, and the mechanical properties of the adherend and the adhesive. Mechanical properties of different T joint configurations subjected to tensile loading were investigated experimentally and numerically in this study. Experimental studies were conducted on five different types of T joints produced by using a two-part epoxy adhesive to bond with aluminum alloy. Stress and deformation analyses of the T joints were performed by using commercial FE software package MSC.Marc. The mechanical behaviors of both adhesives (EA9394) and adherend (2060-T8) were considered. The results of the numerical analysis are in good agreement with those of experimental tests. It is illustrated that the variation of the geometry of the bondline has a strong effect on the stress distributions, stress concentrations, and the load bearing capacity of the adhesively bonded T joint. The average failure load rises with the average bonding area increasing, and the displacement in Y axis has a trend to decrease as the average bondline area increases.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Barnes · J Mater Process Technol · 2000 · 99 · 7210.1016/S0924-0136(99)00361-1 ↗
2. Sargent · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2005 · 25 · 24710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.005 ↗
3. Higgins · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2000 · 20 · 36710.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-3 ↗
4. Li · Chem Adhes · 2006 · 28 · 172
5. Chadegani · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2011 · 31 · 45510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.02.006 ↗
6. Karachalios · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2013 · 43 · 9610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.017 ↗
7. Karachalios · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2013 · 43 · 8110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.016 ↗
8. Karachalios · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2013 · 45 · 6910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.04.009 ↗
9. Adams · 1997
10. da Silva · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2002 · 22 · 31110.1016/S0143-7496(02)00009-X ↗
11. Gul Apalak · J Adhes Sci Technol · 1996 · 10 · 68110.1163/156856196X00616 ↗
12. Gul Apalak · Int J Adhes Adhes · 1996 · 16 · 18710.1016/0143-7496(96)87013-8 ↗
13. Kemal Apalak · J Adhes Sci Technol · 2002 · 16 · 45910.1163/156856102760067226 ↗
14. Khalili · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2011 · 31 · 34710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.005 ↗
15. Demir Aydin · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2014 · 50 · 14210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.028 ↗
16. Hu · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2012 · 38 · 1710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.05.007 ↗
17. Akpinar · Appl Math Model · 2013 · 37 · 1022010.1016/j.apm.2013.06.008 ↗
18. Sun · Chin J Nonferr Met · 2014 · 364
19. 〈http://www.henkelna.com/product-search-1554.htm?nodeid=8797801054209〉