journal article·2014-10

Creep of epoxy–clay nanocomposite adhesive at the FRP interface: A multi-scale investigation

Sherif H. Aboubakr, Usama F. Kandil, Mahmoud Reda Taha

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Externally bonded FRP laminates are widely used for strengthening structures due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and extended durability. However, creep of epoxy adhesives at the FRP interface has been reported, creating a concern about the efficiency of the FRP strengthening with time. Nanoclay platelets have been suggested to control creep of epoxy adhesives at the FRP interface. A multi-scale experimental investigation of creep of the epoxy–clay nanocomposite was performed. This investigation included examining macrocreep of epoxy at the FRP–steel interface using double lap shear test set-up, followed by investigating nanocreep of the epoxy–clay nanocomposite using nanoindentation. Microstructural characterizations including X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 29 Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy of the epoxy–clay nanocomposite were performed. Nanoclay platelets dispersion, intercalation or exfoliation was found to significantly affect creep of epoxy. Exfoliated nanoclay was found to reduce epoxy cross-linking and thus increase creep. However, agglomeration of intercalated nanoclay platelets allowed them to work as micro-particulate reinforcement in the epoxy matrix and therefore reduce epoxy-chain mobility and limit creep. Such complexity in behavior does not allow upscaling creep behavior of epoxy–clay nanocomposites from nano to macroscale.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. CEB–FIB. FIB bulletin 14, externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete (FIB); 2001.
2. ACI Committee 440.2R-08. Guide for design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute (ACI); 2008.
3. Comprehensive study on using externally bonded FRP composites for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete T-beam bridges10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000070 ↗
4. Behavior of various anchorage systems used for shear strengthening of concrete structures with externally bonded FRP sheets10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000420 ↗
5. Performance evaluation of RC beams strengthened with an externally bonded FRP system under simulated vehicle loads10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000324 ↗
6. Environmental durability of externally bonded FRP materials intended for repair of concrete structures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.096 ↗
7. Evaluating the long-term durability of externally bonded FRP via field assessments10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000305 ↗
8. Reda Taha MM, Tromposch E, Tadros G, Mufti A, Klowak C. Performance based design for FRP strengthening of the roof panels of Calgary Saddledome. In: Rizkalla S, et al. (editors.), ACI special publication SP-215: field application of FR reinforcement: case studies; 2003. p. 385–98.
9. Strengthening steel bridge sections using CFRP laminates10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00006-3 ↗
10. Creep effects in plain and FRP-strengthened RC beams
11. Creep in concrete beams strengthened with composite materials10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.05.007 ↗
12. Clay, nanoclays, and montmorillonite minerals10.1007/s11661-008-9603-5 ↗
13. Natural nanoclays: applications and future trends – a Chilean perspective10.1180/claymin.2009.044.2.161 ↗
14. McLaren · 1996
15. Effect of temperature, duration and speed of pre-mixing on the dispersion of clay/epoxy nanocomposites10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.024 ↗
16. Bhattacharya · 2008
17. Long-time concrete–composite interface characterization for reliability prediction of RC beam strengthened with FRP10.1617/13691 ↗
18. Experimental and analytical investigations of creep of epoxy adhesive at the concrete–FRP interfaces10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.003 ↗
19. Creep behavior of adhesives used for external FRP strengthening of RC structures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.002 ↗
20. Effect of moisture on the viscoelastic properties of an epoxy–clay nanocomposite10.1007/s11029-011-9172-3 ↗
21. Synder R. Characterization of nanoclay nanocomposites. In: Proceedings of the composites & polycon. Tampa, FL, USA; 2007.
22. Nano-mechanical creep properties of nanoclay/epoxy composite by nanoindentation10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.669 ↗
23. Kornmann X, Hjalmarsson P, Krivda A. Electrical and mechanical properties of epoxy–clay nanocomposites. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on composite materials. Kyoto, Japan; 2007.
24. EPOTUF® 37-127 liquid epoxy resin product bulletin. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
25. Cloisite® 30B product bulletin. Southern Clay Products, Inc.
26. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
27. Fischer-Cripps · 2004
28. The contact problem of viscoelastic bodies10.1115/1.3644020 ↗
29. The contact stresses between a rigid indenter and a viscoelastic half-space
30. Measurements of creep compliance of solid polymers by nanoindentation10.1023/B:MTDM.0000007217.07156.9b ↗
31. Contact creep compliance of viscoelastic materials via nanoindentation10.1557/jmr.2006.0197 ↗
32. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites10.1002/adma.19960080104 ↗
33. Epoxy-resin nanosuspensions and reinforced nanocomposites from polyaniline stabilized multi-walled carbon nanotubes10.1039/C2TC00379A ↗
34. Cuéllar-Burgos A, Mesa-Rueda FA, Vargas-Hernndez C, Perilla-Perilla JE. Polyurethane–urea nanocomposites: synthesis and characterization. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress of chemical engineering. Montreal, Canada; 2009. p. 022201
35. Study on structure and orientation action of polyurethane nanocomposites10.1021/ma049900g ↗
36. ASTM D3418-12. Standard test method for transition temperatures and enthalpies of fusion and crystallization of polymers by differential scanning calorimetry. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International; 2012.
37. Solid-state high-resolution silicon-29 chemical shifts in silicates10.1021/j150652a015 ↗
38. Kramers–Kronig analysis of reflection data10.1088/0508-3443/16/8/310 ↗
39. Cross-linking of linear vinylpolysiloxanes by hydrosilylation – FTIR spectroscopic studies10.1016/j.vibspec.2012.01.002 ↗
40. Vašková H, Křesálek V. Raman spectroscopy of epoxy-resin crosslinking. In: Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS international conference on automatic control, modeling and simulation (ACMOS 2011); 2011. p. 357–61.