Effect of Al:P ratio on bonding performance of high-temperature resistant aluminum phosphate adhesive
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A series of high-temperature resistant aluminum (Al) phosphate (P) adhesives with different Al:P ratios were prepared using Si as the sole additive. The influence of Al:P ratio on the temperature-dependent composition and structural evolution of the adhesives and their bonding performance were systematically analyzed. The conversion of aluminum metaphosphate to aluminum orthophosphate during the heating process from 700 °C to 900 °C decreased with increasing Al:P ratio, which reduced the generation of micro cracks inside the adhesive. Higher Al:P ratios (≥1:1) were favorable for the generation of alumina, which then reacted with silicon oxide to form mullite phase at high temperatures. No mullite phase was generated for Al:P ratios lower than 1. Accordingly, increasing Al:P ratio effectively improved the bonding performance and thermal shock resistance of the adhesive. The bonding strength of adhesive with an Al:P ratio of 1:0.85 after calcination at 1300 °C was 35.7% and 112%, respectively, higher than those of adhesives with Al:P ratios of 4:5 and 1:2. Besides, the retention rates of their bonding strength were 48.8%, 28.6% and 7.9%, respectively, after 15 thermal shocks based on air-cooling from 1300 °C to RT.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Lin · Ceram Int · 2009 · 35 · 131110.1016/j.ceramint.2008.06.006 ↗
2. Tian · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2012 · 32 · 14910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.08.001 ↗
3. Jin · J Am Ceram Soc · 2007 · 90 · 383010.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01513.x ↗
4. Han · J Mater Process Technol · 2011 · 211 · 119110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.024 ↗
5. Fernie · Int Mater Rev · 2009 · 54 · 28310.1179/174328009X461078 ↗
6. Zhang · Ceram Int · 2019 · 45 · 154510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.028 ↗
7. Halbiga · Ceram Int · 2013 · 39 · 415110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.271 ↗
8. Dong · Mater. Sci. Eng. B-solid · 2011 · 176 · 6010.1016/j.mseb.2010.09.002 ↗
9. Charles · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 417 · 37510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.084 ↗
10. Luo · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2012 · 32 · 381910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.049 ↗
11. Tian · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2010 · 30 · 320310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.017 ↗
12. Perham · J Am Ceram Soc · 1999 · 82 · 29710.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20061.x ↗
13. Feng · Mater. Today Commun. · 2020 · 23 · 10094410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100944 ↗
14. Wang · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2015 · 35 · 408310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.07.036 ↗
15. Wang · Int J Adhesion Adhes · 2006 · 26 · 20610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.003 ↗
16. Liu · Surf Coating Technol · 2012 · 206 · 351710.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.02.031 ↗
17. Wang · Ceram Int · 2014 · 40 · 1158110.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.123 ↗
18. Li · J Alloys Compd · 2019 · 785 · 83810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.114 ↗
19. Sayyedan · Surf Coating Technol · 2018 · 351 · 12810.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.086 ↗
20. Hao · Int J Appl Ceram Technol · 2013 · 10 · 97810.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02842.x ↗
21. Tanaka · Mater Res Bull · 2000 · 35 · 7510.1016/S0025-5408(00)00186-0 ↗
22. S. Sambasivan, K. A. Steiner, USA, US6461415, 2002.
23. Liu · Surf Coating Technol · 2012 · 206 · 351710.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.02.031 ↗