Experimental study of initial strengths and hygrothermal degradation of adhesive joints between thin aluminum and steel substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Growing usage of lightweight materials such as Al and Mg alloys and composites in automotive body manufacturing has come to a point that bonding of dissimilar materials is a realistic problem to address. A significant issue related to the bonding of dissimilar materials is that the differences in substrate surface conditions, substrate chemical and physical properties often lead to bond failure at strength levels far less than the bond strength established by the adhesive manufacturer for a balanced joint. This research experimentally studied several important factors influencing initial shear strengths and hygrothermal degradation of adhesively-bonded single lap shear (SLS) joints. The effects of surface treatments such as lubrication and zinc coating on the substrates were first investigated. It was observed that even a very small change in the amount of lubricant applied to an aluminum alloy affected the initial shear strength. On the other hand, varying the amount of mill oil on a galvanized steel surface had little effect. Next, the comparative study of the initial joint strength between electro-galvanized (EG) steels and hot dipped galvanized (HDG) steels revealed that the two coatings exhibited no difference in terms of the initial strength. Also, various combinations of aluminum alloys and steel substrates were studied to observe the effect of substrate materials. It revealed that the strength of a dissimilar joint constructed of a strong substrate and relatively weak substrate fell below the strength of the like-material joint made of the relatively strong substrate, and was closer to the strength of the like-material joint composed of the relatively weak substrate. Ageing tests were performed on SLS joints at various temperatures with and without humidity. The shear strength barely changed after 60-days of exposure at various temperatures with room humidity, but degraded significantly at high temperature with high humidity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Adhesive-bonded single-lap Joints, NASA technical report
2. A parametric study on the failure of bonded single-lap joints of carbon composite and aluminum10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.026 ↗
3. Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.012 ↗
4. Incorporating environmental degradation in closed form adhesive joint stress analyses10.1080/00218460801954268 ↗
5. Analysis of single lap adhesive joints between magnesium and other structural automotive materials10.4271/2011-01-0076 ↗
6. Effect of the temperature on the strength of adhesively bonded single lap and T joints for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.01.002 ↗
7. Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.001 ↗
8. Moisture absorption-desorption effects in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.05.001 ↗
9. Experimental and numerical investigation of the static response of environmentally aged adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.007 ↗
10. Schroeder KJ, Structural adhesives for aluminum vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 960166; 1996. doi:10.4271/960166.10.4271/960166 ↗
11. Mixed-mode fatigue behavior of degraded toughened epoxy adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.007 ↗
12. The locus of environmental crack growth in bonded aluminium alloy joints10.1080/00218468408074915 ↗
13. Comparison of damage development in c/epoxy laminates during isothermal ageing or thermal cycling10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.002 ↗
14. Kinloch · 1983
15. Predicting the residual strength for environmentally degraded adhesive lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.04.003 ↗
16. Modelling the environmental degradation of adhesively bonded aluminium and composite joints using a czm approach10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.015 ↗
17. Adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e4 ↗
18. Role of corrosion in the failure of adhesive joints
19. Kinloch AJ, Bland D, Tan KT, Watts JF, Environmental attack at polymer/metal interfaces, In: Gdoutos EE, Proceedings of the 16th European conference of fracture, Greece; 2006, p. 911–2.10.1007/1-4020-4972-2_451 ↗
20. Effect of moisture content in uncured adhesive on static strength of bonded galvanized dp600 steel joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.004 ↗
21. Kinloch · 2007 · vol. 42
22. ASTM D1183-03. Standard practices for resistance of adhesives to cyclic laboratory aging conditions. ASTM; 2003.
23. ASTM D1151-00. Standard practice for effect of moisture and temperature on adhesive bonds. ASTM; 2000.
24. ASTM D1828-01. Standard practice for atmospheric exposure of adhesive-bonded joints and structures. ASTM; 2001.
25. Adams · 2000
26. ISO4587. Determination of tensile lap-shear strength of rigid-to-rigid bonded assemblies; 2003.
27. Influence of local geometry on the strength of adhesive joints10.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3 ↗
28. Hallquist JO, LS-DYNA keyword user's manual, Version 970. California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2003.
29. Xinran Xiao. Modeling of adhesively bonded joints using solid cohesive interface element, SAE 2007 World Congress, 2007-01-0984.10.4271/2007-01-0984 ↗
30. da Silva · 2008
31. Strength loss mechanisms for adhesive bonds to electroplated zinc and cold rolled steel substrates subjected to moist environments10.1080/00218468908048200 ↗
32. Improvement of the durability of zinc-coated steel/epoxy bonded joints10.1080/00218469308026560 ↗