Adhesive thickness effects of a ductile adhesive by optical measurement techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Adhesive bonding is an excellent alternative to traditional joining techniques such as welding, mechanical fastening or riveting. However, there are many factors that have to be accounted for during joint design to accurately predict the joint strength. One of these is the adhesive layer thickness (tA). Most of the results are for epoxy structural adhesives, tailored to perform best with small values of tA, and these show that the lap joint strength decreases with increase of tA (the optimum joint strength is usually obtained with tA values between 0.1 and 0.2 mm). Recently, polyurethane adhesives were made available in the market, designed to perform with larger tA values, and whose fracture behaviour is still not studied. In this work, the effect of tA on the tensile fracture toughness ( G n c ) of a bonded joint is studied, considering a novel high strength and ductile polyurethane adhesive for the automotive industry. This work consists on the fracture characterization of the bond by a conventional and the J-integral techniques, which accurately account for root rotation effects. An optical measurement method is used for the evaluation of crack tip opening (δn) and adherends rotation at the crack tip (θo) during the test, supported by a Matlab® sub-routine for the automated extraction of these parameters. As output of this work, fracture data is provided in traction for the selected adhesive, enabling the subsequent strength prediction of bonded joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Buckling behaviour of carbon–epoxy adhesively-bonded scarf repairs10.1163/156856109X433045 ↗
2. Determination of cohesive parameters for a mixed mode cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.10.005 ↗
3. Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations10.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
4. Strength improvement of adhesively-bonded joints using a reverse-bent geometry10.1163/016942411X580081 ↗
5. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints10.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
6. Die nietkraftoerteilung in zubeanspruchten nietverbindungen mit konstanten loschonquerschnitten
7. The stresses in cemented joints10.1115/1.4009336 ↗
8. Global yielding as a failure criteria for bonded joints10.1016/0143-7496(89)90110-3 ↗
9. Analysis and evaluation of bond line thickness effects on failure load in adhesively bonded structures10.1163/156856101317035503 ↗
10. Experimental and numerical analysis of single lap joints for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.001 ↗
11. Shear behaviour of adhesive layers10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.036 ↗
12. Effect of bond thickness on the fracture toughness of adhesive joints10.1115/1.1631433 ↗
13. Boundary effect on concrete fracture and non-constant fracture energy distribution10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00223-0 ↗
14. Biel · 2005
15. The fracture resistance of a toughened epoxy adhesive10.1080/00218468108071189 ↗
16. Influence of layer thickness on cohesive properties of an epoxy-based adhesive – an experimental study10.1080/00218464.2010.498718 ↗
17. Fracture mechanics for delamination problems in composite materials10.1177/002199838301700302 ↗
18. Fracture toughness determination of adhesive and co-cured joints in natural fibre composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.025 ↗
19. Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006 ↗
20. Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
21. Faneco · 2014
22. The effect of adhesive thickness on the mechanical behavior of a structural polyurethane adhesive10.1080/00218464.2014.903802 ↗
23. A review of the use of the J integral as a fracture parameter
24. A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks10.1115/1.3601206 ↗
25. The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
26. Adherend thickness effect on the tensile fracture toughness of a structural adhesive using an optical data acquisition method10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.015 ↗
27. Buckling strength of adhesively-bonded single and double-strap repairs on carbon–epoxy structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.010 ↗
28. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
29. Effect of bond thickness on fracture behaviour in adhesive joints10.1080/00218460108029592 ↗
30. Effect of bondline thickness on mixed-mode fracture of adhesively bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2011.600668 ↗
31. Effect of adhesive thickness on fatigue and fracture of toughened epoxy joints – Part I: experiments10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.025 ↗
32. On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004 ↗
33. Lewis JP. Fast template matching, vision interface 95, Canadian image processing and pattern recognition society, Quebec City, Canada, May 15–19; 1995. p. 120–3.