On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, Part I: Elastic solution benchmarks
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper develops and demonstrates a novel penalty methodology for enhancing the use of the cohesive-zone method (CZM) in finite element models to analyze crack initiation and propagation of surface-bonded structures. For many industrial uses, the CZM finite element approach is troublesome because it is a 3-parameter model depending on critical energy release rate, critical limiting maximum stress and the shape of the traction-separation law. The penalty framework described in the current work maps the CZM approach to fit within the classic Griffith energy release method which is dependent solely on the single material parameter of critical energy release rate. This penalty approach is demonstrated for two generalized problems: double cantilever beam (DCB) analysis and single-arm peeling of very thin elastic substrates. Comparisons with several analytical and pseudo-analytical benchmarks demonstrates how to utilize this new technique as well as the accuracy of the resulting finite element analysis (FEA) solutions for these nonlinear crack propagation and peeling problems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Numerical methods in engineering · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues10.1002/nme.93 ↗
2. BSI, Determination of Mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) Specimens. British Standard BS 7991:2001, October 23, 2001.
3. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
4. The use of cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints10.1023/A:1023998013255 ↗
5. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ. Protocol for the determination of mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens. European Structural Integrity Society, June 22, 2000.
6. Broek · 1986
7. Camanho PP, Davila CG. mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737, June 2002.10.2514/6.2001-1486 ↗
8. Predicting progressive delamination of composite material specimens via interface elements10.1080/107594199305476 ↗
9. Applications of DSP to explicit dynamic FEA simulations of elastically-dominated impact problems10.1155/2000/931351 ↗
10. Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test10.1080/00218460309555 ↗
11. Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG. Finite element analysis of fracture processes in composites and adhesively-bonded joints using cohesive zone models. In: Guagliano M, Aliabadi MH, editors. Advances in fracture and damage mechanics, vol. II. 2001. p. 445–50.
12. Kinloch · 1990
13. Kinloch AJ, Hadavinia H, et al. The peel behavior of adhesive joints. In: Proceeding of the annual meeting of the adhesive society, 23rd ed. 2000.
14. The peeling of flexible laminates10.1007/BF00012635 ↗