Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The structural integrity of multi-component structures is usually determined by the strength and durability of their unions. Adhesive bonding is often chosen over welding, riveting and bolting, due to the reduction of stress concentrations, reduced weight penalty and easy manufacturing, amongst other issues. In the past decades, the Finite Element Method (FEM) has been used for the simulation and strength prediction of bonded structures, by strength of materials or fracture mechanics-based criteria. Cohesive-zone models (CZMs) have already proved to be an effective tool in modelling damage growth, surpassing a few limitations of the aforementioned techniques. Despite this fact, they still suffer from the restriction of damage growth only at predefined growth paths. The eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) is a recent improvement of the FEM, developed to allow the growth of discontinuities within bulk solids along an arbitrary path, by enriching degrees of freedom with special displacement functions, thus overcoming the main restriction of CZMs. These two techniques were tested to simulate adhesively bonded single- and double-lap joints. The comparative evaluation of the two methods showed their capabilities and/or limitations for this specific purpose.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Messler · 1993
2. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.007 ↗
3. Die nietkraftoerteilung in zubeanspruchten nietverbindungen konstanten loschonquerschnitten
4. The stresses in cemented joints10.1115/1.4009336 ↗
5. Strength of adhesive-bonded lap joints with respect to change of temperature and fatigue10.1007/BF02327312 ↗
6. Hart-Smith LJ. Adhesive-bonded single-lap joints. NASA Technical Report CR-112236. Hampton, USA: Langley Research Centre; 1973.
7. Two dimensional displacement–stress distributions in adhesive bonded composite structures10.1080/00218467408075027 ↗
8. Three dimensional failure analysis and damage propagation behavior of adhesively bonded single lap joints in laminated FRP composites10.1177/0731684407070026 ↗
9. Stress concentration factors for bonded lap joint10.2514/3.44305 ↗
10. Strength prediction of bonded single-lap joints by non-linear finite element methods10.1016/0143-7496(84)90103-9 ↗
11. Non-linear adhesive bonded joint design analyses10.1016/0143-7496(90)90025-S ↗
12. An elastoplastic investigation of the peel test10.1080/00218468208073190 ↗
13. Development of a failure model for the adhesively bonded tubular single lap joint10.1080/00218469208030467 ↗
14. An investigation of the stress singularity near the free edge of scarf joints10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00118-7 ↗
15. Intrinsic static strength of friction interfaces augmented with anaerobic adhesives10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00062-7 ↗
16. Adhesive and composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under tensile loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.02.005 ↗
17. The effect of damage nucleation on the toughness of an adhesive joint10.1080/00218460108029618 ↗
18. Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model10.1163/156856107781061477 ↗
19. A combined stress-based and fracture-mechanics-based model for predicting delamination in composites10.1016/0010-4361(93)90016-2 ↗
20. Prediction of delamination initiation and growth from discontinuous plies using interface elements10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00134-6 ↗
21. Cohesive zone modelling of interface fracture near flaws in adhesive joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.12.003 ↗
22. Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003 ↗
23. Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.10.008 ↗
24. The effects of geometry and material properties on the fracture of single lap-shear joints10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00344-X ↗
25. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing
26. Melenk JM, Babuska I. The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Seminar fur Angewandte Mathematik, Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule, Research Report No. 96-01, January, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 1996.10.21236/ADA301760 ↗
27. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
28. Mohammadi · 2008
29. Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modeling10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
30. Arbitrary branched and intersecting cracks with the extended finite element method10.1002/1097-0207(20000830)48:12<1741::AID-NME956>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
31. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
32. Appropriate extended functions for X-FEM simulation of plastic fracture mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2005.02.007 ↗
33. An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00035-4 ↗
34. Contact friction modeling with the extended finite element method (X-FEM)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.185 ↗
35. Theory and numerics for finite deformation fracture modelling using strong discontinuities10.1002/nme.1573 ↗
36. Fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds of 6082-T6 and 6061-T6 aluminium alloys: a comparison10.1016/j.tafmec.2008.07.007 ↗
37. ASTM-E8M-04. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials [Metric], 2004.
38. NF T 76-142. Méthode de preparation de plaques d'adhésifs structuraux pour la réalisation d'éprouvettes d'essai de caractérisation, 1988.
39. ISO 11003-2:1993(E). Adhesives—determination of shear behavior of structural bonds, Part II: thick adherend tensile test method, 1993.
40. Alternative methods to measure the adhesive shear displacement in the thick adherend shear test10.1163/156856108X292241 ↗
41. Predictive strength–fracture model for composite bonded joints10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.029 ↗
42. On the analysis of adhesively bonded structures: a high order semielastic adhesive layer model10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.024 ↗
43. ABAQUS® HTML Documentation, Dassault Systemes, 2009.
44. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
45. Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method, Part I: computer implementation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.08.002 ↗
46. The effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of adhesives for the automotive industry
47. Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives10.1080/00218460902881808 ↗
48. Numerical prediction on the tensile residual strength of repaired CFRP under different geometric changes10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.03.005 ↗
49. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
50. Three dimensional failure analysis and damage propagation behavior of adhesively bonded single lap joints in laminated FRP composites10.1177/0731684407070026 ↗