Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
At present, the bonding of polymer composites to titanium is a problem, which has not been fully resolved. Previous research has shown that bond strengths can be significantly improved by surface treating the adherends prior to bonding. However many of the successful surface treatments involve the use of hazardous chemicals, which have to be phased out as part of an EU directive, which paves the way for less toxic environmentally friendly methods. In this paper various methods of surface treatment including traditional treatments such as acid etch, anodisation, novel plasma spray and laser treatments for both polymer composites and titanium will be discussed. These treatments will be reviewed with respect to changes in surface tension, surface roughness, surface chemistry and how these changes affect bond strength and durability of polymer composite titanium adhesive joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Shaffer · 1991 · vol. 7 · 437
2. Clearfield · 1990
3. Venables · J Mater Sci · 1984 · 19 · 243110.1007/BF00550796 ↗
4. Ahearn JS, Davis GD. Proceeding Adhesion 1987: Third International Conference, York, UK: Plastics and Rubber Institute, 1987.
5. Brockmann · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1986 · 6 · 11510.1016/0143-7496(86)90016-3 ↗
6. Stein BA, Hodges WT, Tyeryar JR. Proceedings of the 26th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference AIAA, 1985, Paper No. 85-0750-CP.
7. Barron V. Ph.D. thesis, University of Limerick, 1998.
8. Arnold JR, Sanders CD, Bellevou DL, Martinelli AA, Gaskin GB. Proceedings of the 29th International SAMPE Technical Conference, vol. 1, 1997. p. 345.
9. Blohowiak KY, Osborne JH, Krienke KA, Sekits DF. Proceedings of the 28th International SAMPE Technical Conference, 1996. p. 440.
10. Boerio FJ, Dillingham RG. In: Mittal KL, Editor. Adhesive joints formation, characteristics, and testing, New York: Plenum Press, 1991. p. 541.
11. British Aerospace Aircraft Group Weybridge-Bristol Division, 1984, Report No. AL/MAT/3864.
12. Critchlow · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1995 · 15 · 16110.1016/0143-7496(95)91627-I ↗
13. Davis · Surf Interface Anal · 1997 · 25 · 36610.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199705)25:5<366::AID-SIA245>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
14. Lockheed-California Company. Prepared for National Air Development Centre, 1983, Report No. NADC-84124-60.
15. Mahoon A. In: Kinloch AJ, editor. Durability of structural adhesives. London: Applied Science Publishers, 1983. p. 255.
16. Reliability, stress analysis and failure prevention aspects of composite and active materials
17. Allen MR. NASA contractor. 1995. Report 198193.
18. Gutowski TG. The mechanics of composite deformation during the manufacturing processes. First Conference on Composite Materials, Dayton, Ohio: American Society for Composites, Oct 7–9, 1986.
19. Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and adhesives. London: Chapman & Hall, 1987. p. 123–127.10.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
20. Yoon TA, McGrath JE. Proceedings of the 36th International SAMPE Symposium, San Diego CA, USA, 1991. p.428.
21. Wingfield · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1993 · 13 · 15110.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9 ↗
22. Blackman, Kinloch, Watts. Composites 1994;25(5).10.1016/S0010-4361(94)80003-0 ↗
23. Kempe G, Krauss H. Adhesion bonding techniques for highly loaded parts of continuous carbon-fibre reinforced polyetherketone (CF_PEEK/APC02). ICAS-92-6.9.1, 1992.
24. Cotter · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1982 · 2 · 4710.1016/0143-7496(82)90066-5 ↗
25. Hill · J Adhesion Sci Technol · 1995 · 9 · 157510.1163/156856195X00211 ↗
26. Strobel · J Adhesion Sci Technol · 1995 · 9 · 36510.1163/156856195X00554 ↗
27. Kodokian · J Mater Sci Lett · 1988 · 7 · 62710.1007/BF01730315 ↗
28. Comyn J Mascia, Xiao. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 1996;16:301–4.10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00010-3 ↗
29. Schut. J Plastics Technol 1992;64.
30. Yasuda · 1985
31. Baalmann A, Vissing KD and Gross A. J Adhesion 1994;46.10.1080/00218469408026649 ↗
32. Barron V. Buggy M. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Adhesion Society Conference Myrtle Beach SC, 2000. p. 540.
33. Potts MW. Proceedings of the Polymer, Laminations and Coatings Conference, 1993. p. 444.
34. DiGiacomo J. Proceedings Finishing ‘91 Conference Cincinnati, Ohio, 1991. p. 376.
35. Demblon · Vide Couches Minces 272 (Suppl) · 1994 · 5 · 394
36. Briggs D. J Mater Sci 1979:14.10.1007/BF00549306 ↗
37. Wurzberg · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1987 · 10 · 337
38. Buchman A, Dodiuk H, Rotal M, Zahavi J. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 1991;11 3.10.1016/0143-7496(91)90014-9 ↗
39. Park · Mater Manufactr Process · 1998 · 13 · 35910.1080/10426919808935254 ↗
40. Park JK, Howard JD, Chen CW, Mukherjee K. Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 14th Technical Conference, Dayton, OH, 1999. p. 661.
41. Miller PD, Jeffreys RA, Pray HA. Metal Progress Report, 1974. p. 61.
42. Filbey JA, Wightman JP. In: Allen KW, editor. Adhesion, 12 ed. London: Applied Science Publishers, 1987. p. 17.
43. Pasajell Data sheets SEMCO Division Products Research and Chemical Corporation 5454 San Francisco Road Glendale CA. 1997.
44. Aronsson · J Biomed Mater Res · 1997 · 35 · 4910.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199704)35:1<49::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
45. Ramani · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1998 · 18 · 40110.1016/S0143-7496(98)00042-6 ↗
46. Boerio FJ, Gosselin CA, Williams JW, Dillingham RG, Burkstrand JM. Proceedings of the Symposium on Polymer Composites, Seattle Washington, USA, 1983. p. 171.
47. Lees WA. Proceedings of the Bonding and Repair of Composites Seminar, Birmingham, UK, 1989. p. 17.
48. Broad · Int J Adhesion Adhesives · 1999 · 19 · 19310.1016/S0143-7496(98)00034-7 ↗