journal article·2009-04

Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: Comparative study

Lucas F.M. da Silva, Paulo J.C. das Neves, R.D. Adams, A. Wang, J.K. Spelt

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The literature survey presented in Part I describes the major analytical models for adhesively bonded joints, especially for single lap joints. By consulting the summary table given in Part I, the designer can choose from a wide range of models which is the best for a particular situation. However, the information given in the summary table is not sufficient for a proper selection. The designer also needs to know the time required for setting up an analysis and solving it. Another important factor is the accuracy of strength prediction. Therefore, models of increasing complexity were selected from the summary table and a comparative study was made in terms of time requirements and failure prediction for various cases. Three main situations were considered: elastic adherends and adhesive, elastic adherends with nonlinear adhesive, and nonlinear analyses for both adherends and adhesive. The adherends were both isotropic (metals) and anisotropic (composites). The effects of the overlap length and the adhesive thickness were also considered.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, Spelt JK. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints, Part I: literature survey. Int J Adhes Adhes 2008, in press, doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005 ↗
2. Volkersen · Luftfahrtforschung · 1938 · 15 · 41
3. Goland · J Appl Mech · 1944 · 66 · A1710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
4. Bigwood · Int J Adhes Adhes · 1989 · 9 · 22910.1016/0143-7496(89)90066-3 ↗
5. Frostig · J Eng Mech · 1999 · 125 · 129810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1298) ↗
6. Hart-Smith LJ. NASA contract report 1973, NASA TR-11234.
7. Bigwood · Int J Adhes Adhes · 1990 · 10 · 3110.1016/0143-7496(90)90025-S ↗
8. Adams · J Adhes · 1992 · 38 · 19910.1080/00218469208030455 ↗
9. Wang · J Adhesion · 2003 · 79 · 2310.1080/00218460309561 ↗
10. Adams · 1997
11. Crocombe · J Strain Anal Eng Des · 1992 · 27 · 21110.1243/03093247V274211 ↗
12. Allman · Quart J Mech Appl Math · 1977 · 30 · 41510.1093/qjmam/30.4.415 ↗
13. da Silva · J Adhes · 2006 · 82 · 109110.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
14. da Silva · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2004 · 24 · 6910.1016/S0143-7496(03)00101-5 ↗
15. Adams · J Adhes · 1993 · 43 · 1710.1080/00218469308026585 ↗
16. Zhao X, Stress and failure analysis of adhesively bonded lap joints, PhD dissertation, University of Bristol, 1991.
17. Wah · ASME J Eng Mater Technol · 1973 · 95 · 17410.1115/1.3443146 ↗
18. Grimes · Compos Mater · 1975 · 135
19. Renton · J Adhes · 1975 · 7 · 17510.1080/00218467508075049 ↗
20. Renton · Eng Fracture Mech · 1975 · 7 · 4110.1016/0013-7944(75)90065-X ↗
21. Srinivas S. NASA technical note 1975, NASA TN D-7855.
22. Delale · J Compos Mater · 1981 · 15 · 24910.1177/002199838101500305 ↗
23. Yang · ASME J Eng Mater Technol · 1996 · 118 · 24710.1115/1.2804896 ↗
24. Mortensen · Compos Sci Technol · 2002 · 62 · 101110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00030-1 ↗
25. Smeltzer · 2003 · 104
26. da Silva · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2006 · 27 · 36210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
27. da Silva · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2007 · 27 · 21610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.002 ↗
28. da Silva · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2007 · 27 · 22710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 ↗
29. da Silva · J Adhes Sci Technol · 2006 · 20 · 170510.1163/156856106779024436 ↗