Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Adhesively-bonded joints are extensively used in several fields of engineering. Cohesive Zone Models (CZM) have been used for the strength prediction of adhesive joints, as an add-in to Finite Element (FE) analyses that allows simulation of damage growth, by consideration of energetic principles. A useful feature of CZM is that different shapes can be developed for the cohesive laws, depending on the nature of the material or interface to be simulated, allowing an accurate strength prediction. This work studies the influence of the CZM shape (triangular, exponential or trapezoidal) used to model a thin adhesive layer in single-lap adhesive joints, for an estimation of its influence on the strength prediction under different material conditions. By performing this study, guidelines are provided on the possibility to use a CZM shape that may not be the most suited for a particular adhesive, but that may be more straightforward to use/implement and have less convergence problems (e.g. triangular shaped CZM), thus attaining the solution faster. The overall results showed that joints bonded with ductile adhesives are highly influenced by the CZM shape, and that the trapezoidal shape fits best the experimental data. Moreover, the smaller is the overlap length ( L O ), the greater is the influence of the CZM shape. On the other hand, the influence of the CZM shape can be neglected when using brittle adhesives, without compromising too much the accuracy of the strength predictions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Determination of cohesive parameters for a mixed-mode cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.10.005 ↗
2. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview
3. Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations10.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
4. The cracked lap shear specimen revisited—a closed form solution10.1016/0020-7683(95)00124-7 ↗
5. Stress concentration factors for bonded lap joint10.2514/3.44305 ↗
6. An evaluation of analytical and numerical solutions to the single-lap joint10.1016/0020-7683(94)90036-1 ↗
7. da Silva · 2011
8. Cohesive zone modelling of interface fracture near flaws in adhesive joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.12.003 ↗
9. Use of a cohesive-zone model to analyze the fracture of a fiber reinforced polymer–matrix composite10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.004 ↗
10. Mode II fracture testing of composites: a new look at an old problem10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.022 ↗
11. Effects of constitutive parameters on the accuracy of measured fracture energy using the DCB-specimen10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.002 ↗
12. Temperature dependence of the fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints10.1163/016942410X507713 ↗
13. eXtended Finite Element Method for fracture characterization of adhesive joints in pure mode I10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.12.012 ↗
14. Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.10.008 ↗
15. Measurement of cohesive zone parameters in tough polyethylene10.1002/pen.11308 ↗
16. Influence of layer thickness on cohesive properties of an epoxy-based adhesive—an experimental study10.1080/00218464.2010.498718 ↗
17. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues10.1002/nme.93 ↗
18. Modeling and simulation of crack propagation in mixed-modes interlaminar fracture specimens10.1007/BF00037233 ↗
19. Predicting progressive delamination of stiffened fibre-composite panel and by decohesion models10.1177/0892705702015005736 ↗
20. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00149-X ↗
21. Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003 ↗
22. Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints10.1007/s10704-006-0072-9 ↗
23. Single-lap joints of similar and dissimilar adherends bonded with an acrylic adhesive10.1080/00218460902880313 ↗
24. Traction-separation laws for progressive failure of a bonded scarf repair of composite panel10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.015 ↗
25. Adhesively-bonded repair proposal for wood members damaged by horizontal shear using carbon-epoxy patches10.1080/00218464.2010.484318 ↗
26. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
27. Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
28. Discrete cohesive zone model to simulate static fracture in 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites10.1177/0021998306061320 ↗
29. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.007 ↗
30. Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006 ↗
31. Strength improvement of adhesively-bonded joints using a reverse-bent geometry10.1163/016942411X580081 ↗
32. Alternative methods to measure the adhesive shear displacement in the thick adherend shear test10.1163/156856108X292241 ↗
33. Buckling behaviour of carbon–epoxy adhesively-bonded scarf repairs10.1163/156856109X433045 ↗
34. Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.019 ↗
35. Computational modelling of the residual strength of repaired composite laminates using a cohesive damage model10.1163/156856108X309576 ↗
36. Three dimensional failure analysis and damage propagation behaviour of adhesively bonded single lap joints in laminated FRP composites10.1177/0731684407070026 ↗
37. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
38. Fracture behaviour of damaged wood beams repaired with an adhesively-bonded composite patch10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.007 ↗
39. Abaqus® HTML Documentation, Dassault Systemes, (2009).
40. Buckling strength of adhesively-bonded single and double-strap repairs on carbon–epoxy structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.010 ↗
41. Mixed-mode cohesive-zone models for fracture of an adhesively bonded polymer–matrix composite10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.004 ↗
42. Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00101-X ↗
43. An explicit FE-model of impact fracture in an adhesive joint10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.10.016 ↗
44. The effects of geometry and material properties on the fracture of single lap-shear joints10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00344-X ↗
45. Adams · 1997
46. Inelastic fracture of adhesively bonded overlap joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.002 ↗
47. Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-8 ↗
48. Strength prediction of patch repaired CFRP laminates loaded in compression10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00011-7 ↗