journal article·2026-06-26

Physics‐Informed Neural Network Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles Based on Elastic Subgrade Reaction Approach

Zexiong Wu, Xueyou Li, Siwei Liu, Jian‐Hong Wan

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conventional numerical methods for analyzing laterally loaded piles, such as the finite element method (FEM), involve matrix assembly and inversion, which leads to increased computational overhead for tasks that require massive computations, such as reliability analysis and optimization design. Recently, physics‐informed neural networks (PINN) have emerged as a mesh‐free technique that relies on randomly sampled spatial collocation points to approximate partial differential equations (PDE) solutions. Although this constitutes a form of spatial discretization, it eliminates the need for mesh connectivity, enabling scalable analysis of high‐dimensional problems. Leveraging these advantages, this study establishes a PINN‐based framework for laterally loaded piles that considers multiple input parameters over wide value ranges, including external loads, pile properties and soil properties. A non‐dimensional approach is employed to normalize the input variables, and the linear elastic superposition is utilized to enhance the model's training efficiency and predictive applicability. The model can be trained purely based on PDEs or in combination with data, providing greater flexibility and physical interpretability than purely data‐driven models. Its performance is validated against field measurements and extensive FEM simulations. Applications involving extensive calculations and differentiations are conducted, demonstrating the proposed PINN model's excellent computational efficiency and its advantages in reliability analysis, optimization design, and pile group analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering & School of Civil Engineering Sun Yat‐Sen University & Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) Zhuhai Guangdong P. R. China

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Marine Civil Engineering Guangzhou Guangdong P. R. China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong Hong Kong P. R. China

School of Infrastructure Engineering Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. H. G.PoulosandE. H.Davis “Pile Foundation Analysis and Design ” (1980).
2. Analysis of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups Using a Variational Approach10.1680/geot.2002.52.3.201 ↗
3. Analysis of Capped Pile Groups Subjected to Horizontal and Vertical Loads10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00029-4 ↗
4. Analysis of Vertically Loaded Piles in Multilayered Transversely Isotropic Soils by BEM10.1016/j.enganabound.2012.10.004 ↗
5. The Problem of Pile Group–Pile Cap Interaction10.1680/geot.1971.21.2.135 ↗
6. Forced Vibrations of Laterally Loaded Piles10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00231-5 ↗
7. PISA Design Model for Monopiles for Offshore Wind Turbines: Application to a Stiff Glacial Clay Till10.1680/jgeot.18.P.255 ↗
8. Non‐Dimensional Solutions for the Stabilising Piles in Landslides in Layered Cohesive Soils Considering Non‐Linear Soil–Pile Interactions10.1680/jgeot.20.P.267 ↗
9. Reliability Analysis of Offshore Monopile Foundations Considering Multidirectional Loading and Soil Spatial Variability10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106045 ↗
10. Numerical Study on the Installation Effect of a Jacked Pile in Sands on the Pile Vertical Bearing Capacities10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104690 ↗
11. Reliability‐Based Design of Laterally Loaded Tapered Offshore Piles in Spatially Variable Clay10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107567 ↗
12. Assessing the Impact of Inertial Load on the Buckling Behavior of Piles With Large Slenderness Ratios in Liquefiable Deposits10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108322 ↗
13. Applicability of Timoshenko, Euler–Bernoulli and Rigid Beam Theories in Analysis of Laterally Loaded Monopiles and Piles10.1680/jgeot.16.P.244 ↗
14. Lateral Resistance of Piles in Cohesive Soils10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000611 ↗
15. Laterally Loaded Piles in a Layered Soil System10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000521 ↗
16. Generalized Solutions for Laterally Loaded Piles10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000303 ↗
17. L. C.ReeseandH.Matlock Non‐Dimensional Solutions for Laterally Loaded Piles With Soil Modulus Assumed Proportional to Depth(1965) Proc. 8th Texas Conf. SMFE. The Univ. of Texas.
18. Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soil With Stiffness Increasing With Depth10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(878) ↗
19. Analytical Solution for Laterally Loaded Long Piles Based on Fourier–Laplace Integral10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.052 ↗
20. Reese L. C. · 2011
21. Hetenyi M. · 1946
22. The Response of Flexible Piles to Lateral Loading10.1680/geot.1981.31.2.247 ↗
23. Numerical Formulation and Implementation of Euler‐Bernoulli Pile Elements Considering Soil‐Structure‐Interaction Responses10.1002/nag.3113 ↗
24. An Efficient Soil‐Integrated Beam‐Column Element for Time‐Domain Nonlinear Analysis of Large‐Scale Soil‐Structure Interaction10.1016/j.cma.2026.119031 ↗
25. Evalution of Conefficients of Subgrade Reaction10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297 ↗
26. Neural Network Based Prediction Schemes of the Non‐Linear Seismic Response of 3D Buildings10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.033 ↗
27. Landslide Identification Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.012 ↗
28. A Rapid Unsaturated Infiltration Prediction Method for Slope Stability Analysis Considering Uncertainties: Deep Operator Networks10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107886 ↗
29. Finite Element Geotechnical Analysis Incorporating Deep Learning‐Based Soil Model10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105120 ↗
30. Using Neural Networks to Represent von Mises Plasticity With Isotropic Hardening10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102732 ↗
31. Modelling the Mechanical Behaviour of Soils Using Machine Learning Algorithms With Explicit Formulations10.1007/s11440-021-01170-4 ↗
32. Using Machine Learning to Predict Axial Pile Capacity10.1177/03611981241242762 ↗
33. B.Ozturk A.Kodsy andM.Iskander “Effect of Feature Selection Technique on the Pile Capacity Predicted Using Machine Learning ” inGeo‐Congress 2024. Presented at the Geo‐Congress 2024(American Society of Civil Engineers 2024b) 153–163.10.1061/9780784485323.016 ↗
34. Forecasting the Capacity of Open‐Ended Pipe Piles Using Machine Learning10.3390/infrastructures8010012 ↗
35. Toward Explainable Pile Buckling Capacity Prediction in Liquefiable Strata: Integrating a Hybrid Framework of AutoML and SHAP10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110116 ↗
36. Physics‐Informed Neural Network Solver for Numerical Analysis in Geoengineering
37. Machine Learning‐Based Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles Through Physics‐Informed Neural Networks10.1007/s11440-023-02179-7 ↗
38. Physics‐Informed Machine Learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
39. M.Raissi P.Perdikaris andG. E.Karniadakis “Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data‐Driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations ” (2017) arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10561 2017.
40. Physics‐Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Fluid Mechanics: A Review10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
41. Surrogate Modeling for Fluid Flows Based on Physics‐Constrained Deep Learning Without Simulation Data
42. Constitutive Model Characterization and Discovery Using Physics‐Informed Deep Learning10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105828 ↗
43. A Physics‐Informed Deep Learning Framework for Inversion and Surrogate Modeling in Solid Mechanics
44. A Physics‐Guided Neural Network Framework for Elastic Plates: Comparison of Governing Equations‐Based and Energy‐Based Approaches
45. A Physics‐Informed Machine Learning Framework for Inverse Multi‐Solution Problems10.1016/j.apm.2025.116618 ↗
46. Physics‐Informed Multi‐LSTM Networks for Metamodeling of Nonlinear Structures
47. Physics‐Informed Deep Learning for One‐Dimensional Consolidation10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.09.005 ↗
48. Application of Improved Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Consolidation Problems With Continuous Drainage Boundary Conditions10.1007/s11440-023-01899-0 ↗
49. A Physics‐Informed Data‐Driven Approach for Consolidation Analysis10.1680/jgeot.22.00046 ↗
50. Application of Physics‐Informed Neural Networks to Inverse Problems in Unsaturated Groundwater Flow
51. Physics Informed Neural Network Simulation of Multiphase Poroelasticity Using Stress‐Split Sequential Training
52. Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Large Deflection Analysis of Slender Piles Incorporating Non‐Differentiable Soil‐Structure Interaction10.1002/nag.3679 ↗
53. Application of Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse Analysis of Pile‐Soil Interaction10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112319 ↗
54. Can Physics‐Informed Neural Networks Beat the Finite Element Method10.1093/imamat/hxae011 ↗
55. R.Cipolla Y.Gal andA.Kendall “Multi‐Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semantics ” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition(2018).10.1109/CVPR.2018.00781 ↗
56. A Physics‐Informed Neural Network Technique Based on a Modified Loss Function for Computational 2D and 3D Solid Mechanics10.1007/s00466-022-02252-0 ↗
57. 2008
58. A.Paszke S.Gross F.Massa et al. “PyTorch: An Imperative Style High‐Performance Deep Learning Library ” (2019).
59. Corliss G. · 200210.1007/978-1-4613-0075-5 ↗
60. D.MohanandS. P.Shrivastava “Nonlinear Behavior of Single Vertical Pile Under Lateral Loads ” inOffshore Technology Conference(1971) OTC‐1485‐MS.10.4043/1485-MS ↗
61. Bayesian Inverse Analysis With Field Observation for Slope Failure Mechanism and Reliability Assessment under Rainfall Accounting for Nonstationary Characteristics of Soil Properties10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101568 ↗
62. Characterization of Spatially Varying Soil Properties Using an Innovative Constraint Seed Method10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107184 ↗