Measuring Rate‐ and State‐Dependent Stick‐Slip Friction Parameters Under a Low‐Stiffness Loading Condition
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The rate‑ and state‑dependent friction (RSF) law effectively characterizes fault stick‑slip behavior, with its parameters acting as key variables controlling the mechanical response of fault surfaces. Because these parameters are highly sensitive to the stiffness of the measuring system, this study investigates a method for determining RSF parameters under low‑stiffness loading. Numerical simulations are used to analyze the relationship between characteristic features of the low‑stiffness stress–displacement curves and the friction parameters, thereby verifying the feasibility of the approach. Comparisons further reveal distinct measurement behaviors between high‑ and low‑stiffness systems. The results demonstrate that friction parameters can be reliably inverted from shear tests using a low‑stiffness machine. This method substantially reduces apparatus requirements and enables parameter extraction from the system's spontaneous stick‑slip response without an imposed velocity step, opening the possibility for continuous, real‑time monitoring of friction evolution during loading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan Hubei China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
School of Resources and Safety Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/en1616587110.3390/en16165871 ↗
2. H.Zhang J.Han L.Li H.Zhai andJ. P.Verdon Microseismic Monitoring and Insights of Rupture Mechanism From China's First EGS in Gonghe Basin Tibetan Plateau2024 no. 1 (2024): 1‐5 https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.202410785.10.3997/2214-4609.202410785 ↗
3. 10.1111/1755‐6724.1488310.1111/1755‐6724.14883 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tecto.2024.23043810.1016/j.tecto.2024.230438 ↗
5. 10.1785/022024024410.1785/0220240244 ↗
6. 10.1029/JB088iB12p1035910.1029/JB088iB12p10359 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978‐044452748‐6.00065‐110.1016/B978‐044452748‐6.00065‐1 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0259015110.1007/BF02590151 ↗
9. 10.1029/JB084iB05p0216110.1029/JB084iB05p02161 ↗
10. 10.1016/0022‐5096(84)90007‐310.1016/0022‐5096(84)90007‐3 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐16860‐y10.1038/s41467‐020‐16860‐y ↗
12. 10.1126/science.125580210.1126/science.1255802 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.01110.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.011 ↗
14. 10.1029/92JB0001710.1029/92JB00017 ↗
15. 10.1029/93JB0311010.1029/93JB03110 ↗
16. 10.1029/95JB0031310.1029/95JB00313 ↗
17. 10.1029/97JB0248010.1029/97JB02480 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms1110410.1038/ncomms11104 ↗
19. 10.1130/G39033.110.1130/G39033.1 ↗
20. 10.1029/2005JB00368610.1029/2005JB003686 ↗
21. 10.1029/2007JB00508210.1029/2007JB005082 ↗
22. 10.1029/94GL0159910.1029/94GL01599 ↗
23. 10.1029/93JB0019110.1029/93JB00191 ↗
24. 10.1029/93JB0078010.1029/93JB00780 ↗
25. 10.1785/022024024510.1785/0220240245 ↗
26. 10.1002/2017JB01447610.1002/2017JB014476 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.02610.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.026 ↗
28. An Approach for Measuring the Stiffness of a Testing Machine
29. 10.1007/s10064‐021‐02550‐610.1007/s10064‐021‐02550‐6 ↗
30. 10.1029/2019JB01836310.1029/2019JB018363 ↗
31. 10.1002/2017JB01404910.1002/2017JB014049 ↗
32. 10.1002/2016JB01368110.1002/2016JB013681 ↗
33. 10.1002/2016GC00628610.1002/2016GC006286 ↗