An Analytical Model for Axially‐Loaded Floating Piles in Continuously Inhomogeneous and Two‐Layer Soils
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This work presents elastic analytical solutions for the response of axially‐loaded floating piles embedded in vertically continuous inhomogeneous and two‐layer soil deposits. The proposed model extends previous works of some of the authors for end‐bearing piles to floating piles. For smoothly inhomogeneous soils, a generalised Fourier series faithfully approximates the soil modes, enhancing computational efficiency. For two‐layer soils, the problem is addressed through a formulation of a piecewise eigenvalue problem that extends the classical homogeneous‐soil approach to layered media and satisfies the compatibility of stresses and displacements at the layer interface. This allows the soil modes to be represented by simple trigonometric functions in each layer. The soil is modelled as an approximate Tajimi‐type continuum, accounting solely for the effect of the vertical soil displacement component on the stresses. This reduces the two governing equations from classic axisymmetric elastic medium to a single vertical equilibrium equation. The soil column under the pile tip is treated as a pseudo pile, with properties identical to those of the surrounding soil. Both the actual and the pseudo pile segments are idealised as axially deforming rods following the strength‐of‐materials theory. The predictive capability of the proposed model is verified with comparisons against results obtained from available analytical and numerical solutions in terms of pile head stiffness, pile normal forces, and vertical shear stresses at the soil‐pile interface. The effect of soil inhomogeneity on the load‐transfer mechanism and pile response is investigated through an extensive parametric analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hydraulics and Geotechnics Section, Department of Civil Engineering KU Leuven ‐ Bruges Bruges Belgium
Structural Mechanics Section, Department of Civil Engineering KU Leuven ‐ Arenberg Leuven Belgium
Department of Engineering University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” Aversa Italy
Quantum Neural Technologies QNT Athens Greece
Funding
KU Leuven · Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.000085010.1061/JSFEAQ.0000850 ↗
2. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000016010.1061/AJGEB6.0000160 ↗
3. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000072910.1061/AJGEB6.0000729 ↗
4. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000120710.1061/AJGEB6.0001207 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1994)120:9(1616)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1994)120:9(1616) ↗
6. G.Mylonakis “Contributions to Static and Seismic Analysis of Piles and Pile‐Supported Bridge Piers ” (PhD diss. State University of New York at Buffalo 1995).
7. 10.1680/geot.1998.48.1.5510.1680/geot.1998.48.1.55 ↗
8. 10.1002/(SICI)1096‐9853(199708)21:8<507::AID‐NAG888>3.0.CO;2‐V10.1002/(SICI)1096‐9853(199708)21:8<507::AID‐NAG888>3.0.CO;2‐V ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2000)126:2(189)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2000)126:2(189) ↗
10. 10.1680/jgele.18.0006210.1680/jgele.18.00062 ↗
11. 10.1080/19375247.2019.158853510.1080/19375247.2019.1588535 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000220410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0002204 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000226910.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0002269 ↗
14. 10.1680/geot.2001.51.5.45510.1680/geot.2001.51.5.455 ↗
15. 10.1002/nag.111010.1002/nag.1110 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.02010.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.020 ↗
17. 10.1680/geot.1968.18.4.44910.1680/geot.1968.18.4.449 ↗
18. 10.1680/geot.1971.21.1.4310.1680/geot.1971.21.1.43 ↗
19. 10.1680/geot.1978.28.3.30910.1680/geot.1978.28.3.309 ↗
20. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000079910.1061/AJGEB6.0000799 ↗
21. A. M.Kaynia “Dynamic Stiffness and Seismic Response of Pile Groups ” (PhD diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1982).
22. 10.1016/0267‐7261(91)90053‐310.1016/0267‐7261(91)90053‐3 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1985)111:12(1365)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1985)111:12(1365) ↗
24. 10.1680/geot.1990.40.2.23710.1680/geot.1990.40.2.237 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:10(1531)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:10(1531) ↗
26. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2006.11.00110.1016/j.enganabound.2006.11.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.06.00110.1016/j.compgeo.2008.06.001 ↗
28. 10.1680/geot.1975.25.2.15910.1680/geot.1975.25.2.159 ↗
29. Roesset J. M. · 1980 · 75
30. I.Sanchez‐Salinero Static and Dynamic Stiffness of Single Piles (University of Texas Geotechnical Engineering Report GR82‐31 1982).
31. 10.1680/geot.1989.39.2.20310.1680/geot.1989.39.2.203 ↗
32. 10.1139/t90‐09410.1139/t90‐094 ↗
33. 10.1016/0266‐352X(90)90042‐T10.1016/0266‐352X(90)90042‐T ↗
34. C.Syngros “Seismic Response of Piles and Pile‐Supported Bridge Piers Evaluated Through Case Histories ” (PhD thesis City University of New York 2004).
35. 10.1680/jgeot.18.P.30310.1680/jgeot.18.P.303 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:11(1706)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:11(1706) ↗
37. 10.1016/0266‐352X(95)00019‐710.1016/0266‐352X(95)00019‐7 ↗
38. 10.1080/1748602060109938010.1080/17486020601099380 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.00110.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.001 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2009)135:3(420)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0241(2009)135:3(420) ↗
41. 10.1680/jgele.23.0010010.1680/jgele.23.00100 ↗
42. Dynamic Analysis of a Structure Embedded in an Elastic Stratum
43. G.Anoyatis “Contribution to Kinematic and Inertial Analysis of Piles by Analytical and Experimental Methods ” (PhD thesis Civil Engineering Department University of Patras 2013).
44. 10.1002/nag.288610.1002/nag.2886 ↗
45. 10.1002/eqe.396810.1002/eqe.3968 ↗
46. 10.3208/jgssp.v10.OS‐44‐0510.3208/jgssp.v10.OS‐44‐05 ↗
47. G.Anoyatis S.François N.Letizia A.Della Corte O.Orakci andA.Tsikas “Seismic Soil Pressures on Rigid Walls Retaining Inhomogeneous Backfills ”Proceedings of the 18th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE 2024) 2024.
48. A.Della Corte O.Orakci A.Tsikas S.François andG.Anoyatis “A Semi‐Analytical Model for Axial Soil‐Pile Interaction in Generalized Inhomogeneous Soils ”Proceedings of the XVIII ECSMGE 2024: Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society 2024 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003431749‐58.10.1201/9781003431749-58 ↗
49. A.Della Corte O.Orakci N.Letizia A.Tsikas S.François andG.Anoyatis “An Overview of Semi‐Analytical Models for Soil‐Structure Interaction: Model Development and Toolkit ”Proceedings of the 17th Pan‐American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (XVII PCSMGE) and 2nd Latin‐American Regional Conference of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG) 2024 (accepted for publication).
50. A.Della Corte “A Semi Analytical Model for Elastic Settlements of End‐Bearing Piles in Inhomogeneous Soils ”Proceedings of DFI‐EFFC International Conference on Deep Foundations and Ground Improvement. Geotechnics Reimagined 2025 https://doi.org/10.37308/DFIEFFC251020205.10.37308/DFIEFFC251020205 ↗
51. 10.1002/eqe.430610.1002/eqe.4306 ↗
52. 10.1680/jgeot.24.0115910.1680/jgeot.24.01159 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.10970110.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109701 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943‐7889.000172410.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943‐7889.0001724 ↗
55. 10.1002/nag.366710.1002/nag.3667 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10583210.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105832 ↗
57. C.IodiceandG.Anoyatis “Continuum Analytical Models for the Ultimate Limit State Design of Energy Piles ”Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnics for Sustainable Infrastructure Development. GEOTEC 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 395(2024): 395–409 https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐981‐99‐9722‐0_26.10.1007/978-981-99-9722-0_26 ↗
58. 10.1680/jgeot.20.P.23110.1680/jgeot.20.P.231 ↗
59. A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Approach for Soil‐Pile Interaction
60. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9399(1999)125:9(1048)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9399(1999)125:9(1048) ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10542410.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105424 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0020‐7683(98)00093‐610.1016/S0020‐7683(98)00093‐6 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.10.00710.1016/j.enganabound.2020.10.007 ↗
64. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000271410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0002714 ↗
65. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000190610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0001906 ↗
66. 10.1007/s11440‐020‐01021‐810.1007/s11440‐020‐01021‐8 ↗
67. 10.1002/nag.372110.1002/nag.3721 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.10711910.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107119 ↗
69. 10.1002/eqe.429004030810.1002/eqe.4290040308 ↗
70. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000127010.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0001270 ↗
71. 10.1002/eqe.429004030810.1002/eqe.4290040308 ↗