Modeling Biocemented Sands: Hypoplastic Model for MICP‐Based Ground Improvement
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bio‐cementation offers a sustainable and low‐carbon alternative to conventional ground improvement methods, aligning with the growing demand for green geotechnical solutions. To enable reliable numerical simulation of bio‐cemented soil behavior in engineering applications, advanced constitutive models are required to account for the effects of microbially induced bonding and the resulting changes in mechanical response. In this study, an existing hypoplastic model that accounts for intergranular strain and semi‐fluidized state is adopted as a benchmark. The model is further modified and implemented in finite element code to investigate the spatial heterogeneity characteristic of bio‐cemented soils, arising from nonuniform bacterial activity and localized calcite precipitation. An extension of the model is introduced by incorporating a generalized critical state surface based on the Matsuoka–Nakai criterion. The model's performance is validated against a series of monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests on both untreated and bio‐cemented sand samples. Key capabilities of the model include its ability to accurately capture the enhancement of strength and stiffness due to cementation, the evolution of pore pressure, the manifestation of cyclic mobility, and the increased resistance to liquefaction. To account for spatial variability in bio‐cementation, a boundary value finite element model was developed in PLAXIS using cement content measurements obtained at nine locations within the specimen. The resulting model more accurately captured the nonuniform stress and strain distributions and demonstrated superior agreement with experimental results compared to the homogenized sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ruhr‐Universität Bochum Bochum Germany
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP): Review From an Engineering Perspective10.1007/s10706-021-02041-1 ↗
2. Cell‐Free Soil Bio‐Cementation With Strength, Dilatancy and Fabric Characterization10.1007/s11440-019-00764-3 ↗
3. Mechanics, Modeling, and Upscaling of Biocemented Soils: A Review of Breakthroughs and Challenges10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8446 ↗
4. Review of Strength Improvements of Biocemented Soils10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002565 ↗
5. Bio‐Cementation of Sandy Soil Using Microbially Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Marine Environments10.1680/geot.14.T.025 ↗
6. Microbially Induced Cementation to Control Sand Response to Undrained Shear10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1381) ↗
7. J. T.Dejong K.Soga E.Kavazanjian et al. “Biogeochemical Processes and Geotechnical Applications: Progress Opportunities and Challenges ” inBio‐and Chemo‐Mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2013(Ice Publishing 2014) 143–157.10.1680/bcmpge.60531.014 ↗
8. Calcium Carbonate Cementation of Sand: A Method for Producing Artificially Cemented Samples for Geotechnical Testing and a Comparison With Natural Cementation Processes10.1016/0013-7952(93)90073-L ↗
9. Influence of Confinement and Cementation Level on the Behavior of Microbial‐Induced Calcite Precipitated Sands Under Monotonic Drained Loading10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001379 ↗
10. Biocalcification of Sand Through Ureolysis10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000532 ↗
11. Opportunities and Challenges for a Sustainable Energy Future10.1038/nature11475 ↗
12. B. M.MortensenandJ.DeJong “Strength and Stiffness of Micp Treated Sand Subjected to Various Stress Paths ” inGeo‐Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering(American Society of Civil Engineers 2011) 4012–4020.10.1061/41165(397)410 ↗
13. B. C.MartinezandJ. T.DeJong “Bio‐Mediated Soil Improvement: Load Transfer Mechanisms at the Micro‐and Macro‐Scales ” inAdvances in Ground Improvement: Research to Practice in the United States and China(American Society of Civil Engineers 2009) 242–251.10.1061/41025(338)26 ↗
14. B. M.Montoya J. T.DeJong andR. W.Boulanger “Dynamic Response of Liquefiable Sand Improved by Microbial‐Induced Calcite Precipitation ” inBio‐and Chemo‐Mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2013(ICE Publishing 2014) 125–135.10.1680/bcmpge.60531.012 ↗
15. J. T.DeJong B. C.Martinez B. M.Mortensen et al. “Upscaling of Bio‐Mediated Soil Improvement ” inProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering(IOS Press 2009) 2300–2303.10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-2300 ↗
16. Behavior of Bio‐Mediated Soil in k 0 Loading
17. Quantifying Biomediated Ground Improvement by Ureolysis: Large‐Scale Biogrout Experiment10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000382 ↗
18. Geotechnical Tests of Sands Following Bioinduced Calcite Precipitation Catalyzed by Indigenous Bacteria10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000781 ↗
19. Lattice Element Method for Simulations of Failure in Bio‐Cemented Sands10.1007/s10035-019-0878-6 ↗
20. 3D DEM Modeling of Biocemented Sand With Fines as Cementing Agents10.1002/nag.3466 ↗
21. A Constitutive Model for Unsaturated Cemented Soils Under Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.08.005 ↗
22. A Review of Constitutive Models for Cement‐Treated Clay10.1080/19386362.2017.1370878 ↗
23. A Damage Constitutive Model for Cemented Sandy Gravel Materials10.1007/s10064-025-04234-x ↗
24. High Strength Rubberized Porous Concrete for Sustainable Pavements: Engineering Properties and Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142012 ↗
25. Constitutive Modeling for Biocemented Calcareous Sands10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9089 ↗
26. Modelling of the Elastoplastic Behaviour of the Bio‐Cemented Soils Using an Extended Modified CAM Clay Model10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.09.015 ↗
27. A General Thermodynamic Model for Biotreated Sand: Theory and Analysis10.1007/s11440-025-02689-6 ↗
28. A Bio‐Chemo‐Hydro‐Mechanical Model of Transport, Strength and Deformation for Bio‐Cementation Applications10.1007/s11440-023-02172-0 ↗
29. Liquefaction Modeling for Biocemented Calcareous Sand10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002666 ↗
30. Constitutive Model of Biotreated Sand Based on Thermodynamic Theory10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107352 ↗
31. An Elastoplastic Mechanical Constitutive Model for Microbially Mediated Cemented Soils10.1007/s11440-018-0721-y ↗
32. A Rate‐Dependent Constitutive Equation for Soils10.1016/0093-6413(77)90056-8 ↗
33. Simhypo‐Sand: A Simple Hypoplastic Model for Granular Materials and SPH Implementation10.1007/s11440-024-02350-8 ↗
34. SPH Implementation of a Dynamic Hypoplastic Model for Seismic Large Deformation Analysis in Slopes10.1002/nag.3984 ↗
35. Hypoplastic Modeling of Inherent Anisotropy in Normally and Overconsolidated Clays10.1007/s11440-023-01923-3 ↗
36. Improvement to the Intergranular Strain Model for Larger Numbers of Repetitive Cycles10.1007/s11440-020-01073-w ↗
37. Clay Hypoplasticity Coupled With Small‐Strain Approaches for Complex Cyclic Loading10.1007/s11440-023-02087-w ↗
38. A Hypoplastic Model for Cemented Sand Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading10.1139/cgj-2023-0079 ↗
39. The Drained Behavior of Bio‐Cemented Fine Sand: Effect of Cementation Level, Confining Pressure, and Relative Density
40. A Hypoplastic Relation for Granular Materials With a Predefined Limit State Surface10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199607)1:3<251::AID-CFM13>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
41. Hypoplastic Model for Cohesionless Soils With Elastic Strain Range10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199710)2:4<279::AID-CFM29>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
42. Simple Plasticity Sand Model Accounting for Fabric Change Effects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622) ↗
43. Hypoplastic Model With Fabric Change Effect and Semifluidized State for Post‐Liquefaction Cyclic Behavior of Sand10.1002/nag.3444 ↗
44. Modeling Cyclic Shearing of Sands in the Semifluidized State10.1002/nag.3007 ↗
45. A Hypoplastic Model for Pre‐and Post‐Liquefaction Analysis of Sands10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106314 ↗
46. Mitchell J. · 2005
47. Numerical Simulations of Deviatoric Shear Deformation of Granular Media10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.43 ↗
48. A Bounding Surface Plasticity Model for Cemented Sand Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading10.1680/jgeot.20.P.275 ↗
49. Characterization of Cemented Sand in Triaxial Compression10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(857) ↗
50. Characterization of Cemented Sand by Experimental and Numerical Investigations10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:7(992) ↗
51. Large‐Scale Triaxial Experiments on the Static and Dynamic Behavior of an Artificially Cemented Gravel Material10.1080/19648189.2020.1792350 ↗
52. J.Chu S.Varaksin U.Klotz andP.Menge “State of the Art Report: Construction Processes ” inProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering(2009) 3001–3132.
53. Effects of the Inclusion of Industrial and Agricultural Wastes on the Compaction and Compression Properties of Untreated and Lime‐Treated Clayey Sand10.1007/s42452-020-03369-8 ↗
54. Effect of Scrap Tyre on Strength Properties of Untreated and Lime‐Treated Clayey Sand10.1080/19648189.2019.1585964 ↗
55. A Particulate‐Scale Investigation of Cemented Sand Behavior10.1139/T07-070 ↗
56. An Experimental Database for the Development, Calibration and Verification of Constitutive Models for Sand With Focus to Cyclic Loading. Part I: Tests With Monotonic Loading and Stress Cycles10.1007/s11440-015-0402-z ↗
57. Failure Mechanisms of Sand Under Asymmetrical Cyclic Loading Conditions: Experimental Observation and Constitutive Modelling10.1680/jgeot.20.P.004 ↗
58. Cyclic Volumetric Strain Accumulation for Sand Under Drained Simple Shear Condition
59. ISA‐Hypoplasticity Accounting for Cyclic Mobility Effects for Liquefaction Analysis10.1007/s11440-019-00846-2 ↗
60. Hypoplastic Model for Sand Under Multidirectional Shearing Conditions Considering Fabric Change Effect10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107168 ↗
61. On the Simulation of Multidimensional Cyclic Loading With Intergranular Strain10.1007/s11440-016-0492-2 ↗
62. An Experimental Database for the Development, Calibration and Verification of Constitutive Models for Sand With Focus to Cyclic Loading. Part II: Tests With Strain Cycles and Combined Loading10.1007/s11440-015-0412-x ↗
63. New Perspectives on Preshearing History in Granular Soils10.1038/s41598-023-31419-9 ↗
64. Influence of Drainage Conditions and Monotonic Preloadings on the Monotonic Behavior of Karlsruhe Fine Sand10.1007/s11440-025-02599-7 ↗
65. Inspection of Three Sophisticated Constitutive Models Based on Monotonic and Cyclic Tests on Fine Sand: Hypoplasticity vs. Sanisand vs. ISA10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.05.001 ↗
66. Determination of Parameters of a Hypoplastic Constitutive Model From Properties of Grain Assemblies10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199909)4:5<461::AID-CFM71>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
67. Mašín D. · 201910.1007/978-3-030-03976-9 ↗
68. A.Niemunis “Incremental Driver User's Manual ”2008 https://www.pg.gda.pl/~aniem/an‐liter.html.
69. “Incremental Driver: Understanding Constitutive Models in Representative Elementary Volume ” accessed February 27 2025 https://github.com/MeritaTafili/REV‐wIncDr/tree/main.
70. Hypoplastic Modeling Post‐Failure Behavior of Sandy Slope With Porosity Spatial Variability10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106470 ↗
71. A Two‐Step Dynamic FEM‐FELA Approach for Seismic Slope Stability Assessment10.1007/s11440-024-02443-4 ↗
72. Improvement of a Hypoplastic Model for Sand Under Undrained Loading Conditions
73. Undrained True Triaxial Response of Initially Anisotropic Particulate Assemblies Using CFM‐DEM10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103509 ↗
74. DEM‐CFM Analysis of Undrained Cyclic Behavior in Transversely Isotropic Granular Soils Under True Triaxial Loading Paths10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12485 ↗
75. Micromechanical Influence of Fabric Anisotropy and Stress Path Dependency on Liquefaction Susceptibility in Granular Soils10.5802/ogeo.23 ↗
76. Anisotropic Critical State Theory: Role of Fabric
77. Sanisand‐fn: An Evolving Fabric‐Based Sand Model Accounting for Stress Principal Axes Rotation10.1002/nag.2855 ↗
78. A Hypoplastic Model for Granular Soils Incorporating Anisotropic Critical State Theory10.1002/nag.3025 ↗
79. H.MatsuokaandT.Nakai “Stress‐Deformation and Strength Characteristics of Soil Under Three Different Principal Stresses ” inProceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers vol.232(Japan Society of Civil Engineers 1974) 59–70.10.2208/jscej1969.1974.232_59 ↗
80. Calibration of a Comprehensive Constitutive Equation for Granular Materials10.3208/sandf.36.13 ↗
81. Numerical Modeling of Soil Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading Using the SANISAND‐Sf Model in the LEAP Experiments10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106613 ↗
82. SANISAND‐MSf: A Sand Plasticity Model With Memory Surface and Semifluidised State10.1680/jgeot.19.P.363 ↗