journal article·2026-06-05Open access

Nordgren PINNs to VQE: Advancing Hydraulic Fracturing Simulations in Shale Reservoirs

Dennis Delali Kwesi Wayo, Sonny Irawan, Mohd Zulkifli Bin Mohamad Noor, Mudasar Zafar, Shynar Juziyeva, Camila Martins Saporetti, Leonardo Goliatt, Randy Hazlett

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study advances hydraulic fracturing simulations in shale reservoirs using two computational paradigms, Physics‐Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). PINNs were employed to solve Nordgren's equation, which governs fracture width evolution, by embedding physical laws into the neural network architecture. Using TensorFlow on Google Colab, the PINN training process incorporated Adam, L‐BFGS, and Newton‐CG optimizers, reaching a final loss of for a representative benchmark case (e.g., fluid viscosity = 8.0 , fracture height = 2.0 m, and leak‐off coefficient = 1.0); these parameters are used for comparison and are not tied to a specific field dataset. However, this approach demands computational resources, with training times exceeding 1454 s and memory usage of 1136 MB. Conversely, the VQE framework leveraged Qiskit on Qbraid to optimize the Hamiltonian representing the fracture system in practice. With qubit‐based ansatz circuits and classical optimizers (SPSA, COBYLA, and L‐BFGS), VQE achieves energy minimization, converging to ‐0.583+0j in under 2 s with low memory requirements. Spatiotemporal fracture width predictions from VQE align with trends but exhibit slight oscillations due to quantum noise. This comparative study highlights a trade‐off: PINNs show stronger physics‐consistent accuracy in the tested cases, while VQE provides lower runtime and memory use. These results suggest that combining PINN accuracy with VQE speed may be useful for decision‐support workflows in hydraulic fracturing. Future research will explore integrating these paradigms for scalable, high‐fidelity simulations across complex geological settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Advanced Graph Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Petroleum Engineering, School of Mining and Geosciences Nazarbayev University Astana Kazakhstan

Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al‐Sultan Abdullah Kuantan Malaysia

College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA

School of Mathematics, Actuarial and Quantitative Studies Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

Department of Computational Modeling, Polytechnic Institute Rio de Janeiro State University Nova Friburgo Brazil

Department of Computational and Applied Mechanics Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora Brazil

Funding

Nazarbayev University · Universiti Malaysia Pahang

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. R. D.HazlettandD. C.Uhri “Enhanced Hydraulic Fracturing of a Shallow Subsurface Formation ” (July 18 1989) US Patent 4 848 468.
2. 10.2118/1210‐0026‐JPT10.2118/1210‐0026‐JPT ↗
3. 10.1016/j.gete.2022.10041610.1016/j.gete.2022.100416 ↗
4. X.Yu P.Winterfeld S.Wang C.Wang L.Wang andY.‐S.Wu “A Geomechanics‐Coupled Embedded Discrete Fracture Model and Its Application in Geothermal Reservoir Simulation ” inSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference(SPE 2019): D020S002R010 https://doi.org/10.2118/193931‐MS.10.2118/193931-MS ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12453010.1016/j.fuel.2022.124530 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engeos.2024.10036410.1016/j.engeos.2024.100364 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13369‐024‐09679‐y10.1007/s13369‐024‐09679‐y ↗
8. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0694110.1021/acsomega.4c06941 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00603‐024‐04264‐z10.1007/s00603‐024‐04264‐z ↗
10. 10.1007/s00603‐024‐04022‐110.1007/s00603‐024‐04022‐1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.04510.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10444‐023‐10065‐910.1007/s10444‐023‐10065‐9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.12454610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124546 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.405054210.1115/1.4050542 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10409‐021‐01148‐110.1007/s10409‐021‐01148‐1 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.12413910.1016/j.energy.2022.124139 ↗
17. A. M.Khan Y.Luo E.Ugarte andD.Bannikov “Physics‐Informed Machine Learning for Hydraulic Fracturing–Part I: The Backbone Model ” inSPE Conference at Oman Petroleum & Energy Show(SPE 2024) p. D021S016R002 https://doi.org/10.2118/218562‐MS.10.2118/218562-MS ↗
18. 10.1088/0034‐4885/61/2/00210.1088/0034‐4885/61/2/002 ↗
19. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.03700110.1103/PRXQuantum.5.037001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.00310.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.15050210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502 ↗
22. 10.2118/18959‐PA10.2118/18959‐PA ↗
23. Sarang P. · 202110.1007/978-1-4842-6150-7 ↗
24. Bisong E. · 2019 · 5910.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8_7 ↗
25. D. P.Kingma “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization ”arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980.
26. 10.1063/1.499512410.1063/1.4995124 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.01210.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.012 ↗
28. M. M.Louamri A.Tounsi M. T.Rouabah et al. “Comparative Study of Quantum Transpilers: Evaluating the Performance of Qiskit‐Braket‐Provider qBraid‐SDK and Pytket Extensions ” in2024 1st International Conference on Innovative and Intelligent Information Technologies (IC3IT)(IEEE 2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3IT63743.2024.10869429.10.1109/IC3IT63743.2024.10869429 ↗
29. R.Wille R.Van Meter andY.Naveh “IBM's Qiskit Tool Chain: Working With and Developing for Real Quantum Computers ” in2019 Design Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)(IEEE 2019) 1234–1240 https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2019.8715261.10.23919/DATE.2019.8715261 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10596‐012‐9323‐110.1007/s10596‐012‐9323‐1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cam.2007.02.00610.1016/j.cam.2007.02.006 ↗
32. 10.3390/bdcc702005710.3390/bdcc7020057 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.petlm.2023.05.00510.1016/j.petlm.2023.05.005 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11831‐025‐10325‐510.1007/s11831‐025‐10325‐5 ↗
35. 10.2118/3009‐PA10.2118/3009‐PA ↗
36. P.Rathore W.Lei Z.Frangella L.Lu andM.Udell “Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective ” inProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning 235(PMLR 2024): 42159–42191.