Anisotropic Initial Damage and Its Effect on Tensile Response of Plain Concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Damage is often described as isotropic, implying that a scalar value describes its initial state. However, the prior micro‐cracking pattern at points of an existing building, that is, the initial damage, may be oriented by a preload. The degradation of the Volume Element due to oriented preloads shall be described as anisotropic and represented by a tensorial variable. While this damage variable could be a fourth‐order tensor, a second‐order tensor is chosen as a pertinent approximation, simplifying computations of the model response. This work aims to account for non‐zero anisotropic initial damage states, and analyze their effect on plain concrete tensile response. The anisotropic initial damage is parameterized in two steps: (i) a description of the tensor in its principal basis and (ii) the orientation of its principal basis. Continuum Damage Mechanics simulations are performed for given initial damage tensors. The effect of initial damage on the tensile response of concrete is then quantified on the peak stress and various post‐peak quantities of interest, such as damage invariants (hydrostatic and von Mises equivalent damage) and relative distance to isotropy of the effective compliance tensor. How the anisotropy and orientation of the principal basis of the initial damage tensor affect the mechanical response is analyzed and discussed, based on the two‐step parameterization. This work highlights that the observed discrepancy of tensile responses of concrete or mortar may be attributed to anisotropy and orientation of initial damage states. In particular, orientation is found to be most influential for uniaxial anisotropic initial damage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université Paris‐Saclay, CentraleSupélec, ENS Paris‐Saclay, CNRS LMPS ‐ Laboratoire de Mécanique Paris‐Saclay Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg Institute of Geotechnics Freiberg Germany
Leibniz University Hannover IBNM ‐ Institute of Mechanics and Computational Mechanics Hannover Germany
International Research Training Group (IRTG) Leibniz University Hannover Hannover Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Lemaitre J. · 1991
2. A Description of Micro‐and Macroscale Damage of Concrete Structures10.1016/0013-7944(86)90036-6 ↗
3. Lemaitre J. · 199610.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
4. Chaboche J. L. · 1982 · 737
5. Leckie F. A. · 1980 · 140
6. Anisotropic Creep Damage in the Framework of Continuum Damage Mechanics10.1016/0029-5493(84)90046-3 ↗
7. E. T.Onat “Effective Properties of Elastic Materials That Contain Penny Shaped Voids ”22(1984):1013–1021.10.1016/0020-7225(84)90102-2 ↗
8. Elastic Solids With Many Cracks and Related Problems10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70176-5 ↗
9. Damage Tensors and the Crack Density Distribution10.1016/0020-7683(93)90158-4 ↗
10. A Stress‐Based Macroscopic Approach for Microcracks Unilateral Effect10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.016 ↗
11. Dormieux L. · 201610.1002/9781119292166 ↗
12. Orthotropic Behavior of Concrete With Directional Aspects: Modelling and Experiments10.1016/0029-5493(92)90094-C ↗
13. Anisotropic Damage Model for the Multi‐Axial Static and Fatigue Behaviour of Plain Concrete10.1016/0013-7944(96)00004-5 ↗
14. Anisotropic Damage Law of Evolution10.1016/S0997-7538(00)00161-3 ↗
15. Micromechanics Based Framework With Second‐Order Damage Tensors10.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.11.014 ↗
16. Anisotropic Damage State Modeling Based on Harmonic Decomposition and Discrete Simulation of Fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109669 ↗
17. Endommagement Anisotrope en Élasticité et Plasticité
18. P.Ladevèze “On an Anisotropic Damage Theory ” inProceedings of the CNRS International College on Failure Criteria of Structured Media351(1983):355–363.10.1201/9781003762850-36 ↗
19. Mechanical Modeling of Material Damage10.1115/1.3173673 ↗
20. A Coupled Theory of Damage Mechanics and Finite Strain Elasto‐Plasticity – I. Damage and Elastic Deformations10.1016/0020-7225(90)90007-6 ↗
21. An Anisotropic Model of Damage and Frictional Sliding for Brittle Materials10.1016/S0997-7538(98)80054-5 ↗
22. A Framework for Geometrically Nonlinear Continuum Damage Mechanics10.1016/S0020-7225(97)00116-X ↗
23. An Anisotropic Ductile Damage Model Based on Irreversible Thermodynamics10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00114-6 ↗
24. Nonlocal Anisotropic Damage Model and Related Computational Aspects for Quasi‐Brittle Materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.012 ↗
25. Application of Some Anisotropic Damage Model to the Prediction of the Failure of Some Complex Industrial Concrete Structure10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.001 ↗
26. Time of the Rupture Process Under Creep Conditions
27. Rabotnov Y. N. · 1969 · 34210.1007/978-3-642-85640-2_26 ↗
28. On the Formulation of Anisotropic Elastic Degradation. Part I: Theory Based on a Pseudo‐Logarithmic Damage Tensor Rate10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00030-5 ↗
29. Modeling and Simulation of the Mechanical Behavior of CMCs
30. Damage 90: A Post Processor for Crack Initiation10.1016/0045-7825(94)90060-4 ↗
31. Elastic and Transport Properties of an In Situ Jointed Granite10.1016/0148-9062(77)90560-5 ↗
32. Imprecise Random Field Analysis for Non‐Linear Concrete Damage Analysis10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107343 ↗
33. Mathematical Model for Freeze‐Thaw Durability of Concrete10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06413.x ↗
34. Vichot A. · 2008
35. A Quantitative Assessment of the Parameters Involved in the Freeze–Thaw Damage of Cement‐Based Materials Through Numerical Modelling10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121838 ↗
36. S.Robinson “Methods of Detecting the Formation and Propagation of Microcracks in Concrete ” inProceedings of the International Conference “The Structure of Concrete” (1965).
37. Lemaitre J. · 1982 · 114
38. Hemivariational Continuum Approach for Granular Solids With Damage‐Induced Anisotropy Evolution10.1177/1081286520968149 ↗
39. Micro–Macro Approach of Anisotropic Damage: A Semi‐Analytical Constitutive Model of Porous Cracked Rock10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109483 ↗
40. A Comparison of Micromorphic Gradient‐Extensions for Anisotropic Damage10.1002/pamm.202400006 ↗
41. A Statistical Anisotropic Damage Constitutive Model for Shale Including the Effects of Confining Pressure and Strain Rate10.1007/s00603-023-03635-2 ↗
42. A Micromechanical Model for Induced Anisotropic Damage‐Friction in Rock Materials Under Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.106014 ↗
43. K.Willam E.Pramono andS.Sture “Fundamental Issues of Smeared Crack Models ” inFracture of Concrete and Rock: SEM‐RILEM International Conference June 17–19 1987 Houston Texas USA(Springer 1989) 142–157.10.1007/978-1-4612-3578-1_15 ↗
44. On the Formulation of Anisotropic Elastic Degradation. Part II: Generalized Pseudo‐Rankine Model for Tensile Damage10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00030-5 ↗
45. Invariant‐based Interpretation of Anisotropic Damage Induced by Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110192 ↗
46. Lemaitre J. · 2005
47. Comparison of Nonlocal Approaches in Continuum Damage Mechanics10.1016/0045-7949(94)00501-S ↗
48. Anisotropic Damage Modelling of Biaxial Behaviour and Rupture of Concrete Structures10.12989/cac.2008.5.4.417 ↗
49. Continuum Damage Theory–Application to Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) ↗
50. Pseudodynamic Testing and Nonlinear Substructuring of Damaging Structures Under Earthquake Loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.007 ↗
51. Delay‐Active Damage Versus Non‐Local Enhancement for Anisotropic Damage Dynamics Computations With Alternated Loading10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.006 ↗
52. Anisotropic Damage Modeling of Concrete Materials10.1177/1056789515606509 ↗
53. Softening Response of Plain Concrete in Direct Tension
54. Nonlocal Damage Theory10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
55. A Critical Comparison of Nonlocal and Gradient‐Enhanced Softening Continua10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-7 ↗
56. Nonlocal Integral Formulations of Plasticity and Damage: Survey of Progress10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:11(1119) ↗
57. Cyclic Nonlocal Anisotropic Damage Modeling of Concrete Mesostructures With Real‐Shaped Aggregates10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107650 ↗
58. Variational Formulation of Loading‐Induced Damage Anisotropy: Theoretical Framework for Second‐Order Anisotropic Damage and Lip‐Field Regularization10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106396 ↗
59. Nonlocal Microplane Model for Fracture, Damage, and Size Effect in Structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:11(2485) ↗
60. Isotropic and Anisotropic Descriptions of Damage in Concrete Structures10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199907)4:4<339::AID-CFM65>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
61. Microplane Model m7 for Plain Concrete. i: Formulation10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000570 ↗
62. Symmetric High Order Microplane Model for Damage Localization and Size Effect in Quasi‐Brittle Materials10.1002/nag.3209 ↗
63. Conversion of Explicit Microplane Model With Boundaries to a Constitutive Subroutine for Implicit Finite Element Programs10.1002/nme.6590 ↗
64. A Regularized Microplane Damage Material Model in the Implicit Material Point Method10.1002/pamm.202400120 ↗
65. An Anisotropic Elastoplastic‐Damage Model for Plain Concrete10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980630)42:4<703::AID-NME384>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
66. Computational Applications of a Coupled Plasticity‐Damage Constitutive Model for Simulating Plain Concrete Fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.04.007 ↗
67. Creep Rupture Under Multi‐Axial States of Stress10.1016/0022-5096(72)90015-4 ↗
68. An Integrity Basis for Plane Elasticity Tensors
69. Mehta M. L. · 2004 · 142
70. Random Anisotropic Initial Damage Tensor10.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.111980 ↗
71. Mechanical Identification With the Reconditioned Equilibrium Gap Method: Formulation, Analysis and Comparisons10.1016/j.cma.2024.117343 ↗
72. Identifying Heterogeneous Elastic Parameters From Full‐Field Measurements With Reduced Bases10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110682 ↗