Semi‐Analytical Solution of Time‐Harmonic Soil–Pile Interaction Using Love Numbers in Transversely Isotropic and Layered Half‐Spaces
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT An efficient semi‐analytical approach based on the Fourier–Bessel series (FBS) system of vector functions and the stiffness matrix method is proposed to study the dynamic response of axially loaded piles embedded in transversely isotropic (TI) layered soil. The method utilizes a robust free‐field matrix formulation of layered soil that integrates with the pile matrix, enabling efficient computation of expansion coefficients, termed as Love numbers. These coefficients need to be computed only once for multilayered soil. They are then stored and reused to quickly obtain responses at multiple field points using FBS synthesis, avoiding the computational complexity of the Hankel integral transform. The proposed formulation is validated against various existing solutions, demonstrating excellent agreement. Furthermore, the effects of compressibility, slenderness, pile spacing, soil anisotropy, layering, and frequency‐dependent loading on the pile–soil interaction are investigated, offering practical insights for improved and reliable pile design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan
Disaster Prevention and Water Environment Research Center National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan
International College of Semiconductor Technology National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan
Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur Uttar Pradesh India
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.00110.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.001 ↗
2. 10.1186/s43065‐025‐00118‐210.1186/s43065‐025‐00118‐2 ↗
3. Soil Structure Interaction the Early Stages
4. Wolf J. · 1985
5. 10.1080/1363246000935037210.1080/13632460009350372 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.00910.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009 ↗
7. 10.1007/s41062‐016‐0003‐110.1007/s41062‐016‐0003‐1 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10395610.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103956 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10812010.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108120 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.06610.1016/j.renene.2021.12.066 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10518‐022‐01331‐010.1007/s10518‐022‐01331‐0 ↗
12. 10.1139/t06‐03810.1139/t06‐038 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:10(1531)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:10(1531) ↗
14. A. M.Kaynia “Dynamic Stiffness and Seismic Response of Pile Groups” (Doctoral diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1982).
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:11(1706)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1991)117:11(1706) ↗
16. T.Nogami “Dynamic Group Effect of Multiple Piles Under Vertical Vibration ” InProceedings of the Engineering Mechanics Specialty Conference(1979) 750–754.
17. 10.1002/nag.161009060210.1002/nag.1610090602 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.10152510.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101525 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10514410.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105144 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.07.03210.1016/j.jsv.2015.07.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.01.00410.1016/j.enganabound.2019.01.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.10755710.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107557 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.07.02610.1016/j.jrmge.2025.07.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/0267‐7261(91)90053‐310.1016/0267‐7261(91)90053‐3 ↗
25. 10.1680/geot.1968.18.4.44910.1680/geot.1968.18.4.449 ↗
26. 10.1680/geot.1979.29.4.42310.1680/geot.1979.29.4.423 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12204‐008‐0171‐z10.1007/s12204‐008‐0171‐z ↗
28. 10.1139/t90-09410.1139/t90-094 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.12.02310.1016/j.jsv.2012.12.023 ↗
30. 10.1680/geot.1998.48.1.5510.1680/geot.1998.48.1.55 ↗
31. 10.28927/SR.41104910.28927/SR.411049 ↗
32. 10.1139/t03‐07310.1139/t03‐073 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2008.04.00310.1016/j.enganabound.2008.04.003 ↗
34. 10.1139/t96‐8710.1139/t96‐87 ↗
35. 10.1139/t74‐05910.1139/t74‐059 ↗
36. 10.1002/nag.7009310.1002/nag.70093 ↗
37. 10.1785/BSSA071006174310.1785/BSSA0710061743 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.174538510.1063/1.1745385 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.08.00610.1016/j.enganabound.2021.08.006 ↗
40. 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG‐1203210.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG‐12032 ↗
41. Love A. E. H. · 1911
42. 10.1680/geot.1971.21.2.13510.1680/geot.1971.21.2.135 ↗
43. R.ButterfieldandN.Ghosh “A Linear Elastic Interpretation of Model Tests on Single Piles and Groups of Piles in Clay ” inNumerical Methods in Offshore Piling Institution of Civil Engineers (1980) 109–118.
44. 10.1680/geot.1989.39.2.20310.1680/geot.1989.39.2.203 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.00310.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.003 ↗
46. Poulos H. G. · 1980
47. 10.1002/nag.384910.1002/nag.3849 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10407310.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104073 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.11012010.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110120 ↗
50. 10.1002/978111918923710.1002/9781119189237 ↗