journal article·2026-08

Analytical Solutions for Stability of Geosynthetic‐Encased Stone Column‐Supported Geosynthetic‐Reinforced Embankment

Xiaocong Cai, Ling Zhang, Zijian Yang

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT A novel three‐wedge limit equilibrium framework is developed to address the stability assessment of embankments reinforced with geosynthetic‐encased stone columns (GESCs) combined with basal geosynthetics. The proposed model comprises five slip surfaces and is capable of accommodating a wide range of conditions, including variable geometry, strength parameters, vertical and horizontal reinforcement, surcharge, pore water pressure, and seismic coefficients. A global factor of safety (FS) is applied consistently across all potential failure surfaces and reinforcement members, and is determined analytically by solving the sixth‐order polynomial equation. This analytical solution provides a compact form method for FS calculation. Validation against the numerical modeling and other analytical methods demonstrates a strong concordance, confirming the reliability and accuracy of the proposed method in predicting system stability and failure mechanisms. The parametric study is conducted to further guarantee the rationality of the analytical method. The parametric analysis reveals that the shear strength of the in‐situ soft soil and the horizontal seismic coefficient are the dominant factors controlling system stability, surpassing the influence of reinforcement strength and embankment geometry in many scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering Hunan University Changsha China

Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education Hunan University Changsha China

National Center for International Research Collaboration in Building Safety and Environment Hunan University Changsha China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2020/887452010.1155/2020/8874520 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10376910.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103769 ↗
3. 10.1007/s41062‐020‐00383‐y10.1007/s41062‐020‐00383‐y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.10933210.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109332 ↗
5. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐1041010.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐10410 ↗
6. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐1028310.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐10283 ↗
7. S.Yoosefi C. L.Meehan A. A.Garakani andA.Mosalmanzadeh Bearing Capacity of a Stone Column Constructed Using the Vibro‐Replacement Method: Experimental and Numerical Investigations(2024) Geo‐Congress 2024.10.1061/9780784485330.006 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40891‐024‐00556‐010.1007/s40891‐024‐00556‐0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.10349810.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103498 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13529210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135292 ↗
11. U.ModalavalasaandA.Ramanathan Performance of Encased Stone Column Aggregates Using Large‐Scale Triaxial Testing(2024) https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485323.046 Geo‐Congress 2024.10.1061/9780784485323.046 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000057910.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0000579 ↗
13. 10.18690/actageotechslov.16.2.25-38.201910.18690/actageotechslov.16.2.25-38.2019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.11.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.11.003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10432110.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104321 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000031610.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0000316 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.01410.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.014 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000142610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0001426 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10617910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106179 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.00210.1016/j.apm.2012.07.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.10779510.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107795 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.09.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.10624410.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106244 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.10.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.10.005 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11440‐024‐02402‐z10.1007/s11440‐024‐02402‐z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.01310.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10909510.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109095 ↗
28. 10.1139/cgj‐2018‐030610.1139/cgj‐2018‐0306 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.05.01010.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.05.010 ↗
30. 10.1139/cgj‐2023‐031410.1139/cgj‐2023‐0314 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10495210.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104952 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.00610.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.006 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000250810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0002508 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000212610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0002126 ↗
35. 10.1520/GTJ10050J10.1520/GTJ10050J ↗
36. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.003 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30)10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30) ↗
38. 10.1680/jgein.17.0001510.1680/jgein.17.00015 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30)10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30) ↗
40. 10.1016/S0266‐1144(98)00034‐X10.1016/S0266‐1144(98)00034‐X ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000187410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0001874 ↗
42. 10.1680/gein.2012.19.1.6210.1680/gein.2012.19.1.62 ↗
43. AASHTO (2020).Determination of Long‐Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington D. C. 20004.