Analytical Solutions for Stability of Geosynthetic‐Encased Stone Column‐Supported Geosynthetic‐Reinforced Embankment
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT A novel three‐wedge limit equilibrium framework is developed to address the stability assessment of embankments reinforced with geosynthetic‐encased stone columns (GESCs) combined with basal geosynthetics. The proposed model comprises five slip surfaces and is capable of accommodating a wide range of conditions, including variable geometry, strength parameters, vertical and horizontal reinforcement, surcharge, pore water pressure, and seismic coefficients. A global factor of safety (FS) is applied consistently across all potential failure surfaces and reinforcement members, and is determined analytically by solving the sixth‐order polynomial equation. This analytical solution provides a compact form method for FS calculation. Validation against the numerical modeling and other analytical methods demonstrates a strong concordance, confirming the reliability and accuracy of the proposed method in predicting system stability and failure mechanisms. The parametric study is conducted to further guarantee the rationality of the analytical method. The parametric analysis reveals that the shear strength of the in‐situ soft soil and the horizontal seismic coefficient are the dominant factors controlling system stability, surpassing the influence of reinforcement strength and embankment geometry in many scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering Hunan University Changsha China
Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education Hunan University Changsha China
National Center for International Research Collaboration in Building Safety and Environment Hunan University Changsha China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2020/887452010.1155/2020/8874520 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10376910.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103769 ↗
3. 10.1007/s41062‐020‐00383‐y10.1007/s41062‐020‐00383‐y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.10933210.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109332 ↗
5. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐1041010.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐10410 ↗
6. 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐1028310.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG‐10283 ↗
7. S.Yoosefi C. L.Meehan A. A.Garakani andA.Mosalmanzadeh Bearing Capacity of a Stone Column Constructed Using the Vibro‐Replacement Method: Experimental and Numerical Investigations(2024) Geo‐Congress 2024.10.1061/9780784485330.006 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40891‐024‐00556‐010.1007/s40891‐024‐00556‐0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.10349810.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103498 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13529210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135292 ↗
11. U.ModalavalasaandA.Ramanathan Performance of Encased Stone Column Aggregates Using Large‐Scale Triaxial Testing(2024) https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485323.046 Geo‐Congress 2024.10.1061/9780784485323.046 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000057910.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0000579 ↗
13. 10.18690/actageotechslov.16.2.25-38.201910.18690/actageotechslov.16.2.25-38.2019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.11.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.11.003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10432110.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104321 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000031610.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0000316 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.01410.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.014 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000142610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0001426 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10617910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106179 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.00210.1016/j.apm.2012.07.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.10779510.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107795 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.09.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.10624410.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106244 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.10.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.10.005 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11440‐024‐02402‐z10.1007/s11440‐024‐02402‐z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.01310.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.05.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.10909510.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109095 ↗
28. 10.1139/cgj‐2018‐030610.1139/cgj‐2018‐0306 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.05.01010.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.05.010 ↗
30. 10.1139/cgj‐2023‐031410.1139/cgj‐2023‐0314 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.10495210.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104952 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.00610.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.006 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000250810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0002508 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.000212610.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943‐5622.0002126 ↗
35. 10.1520/GTJ10050J10.1520/GTJ10050J ↗
36. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.003 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30)10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30) ↗
38. 10.1680/jgein.17.0001510.1680/jgein.17.00015 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30)10.1061/(ASCE)1532‐3641(2006)6:1(30) ↗
40. 10.1016/S0266‐1144(98)00034‐X10.1016/S0266‐1144(98)00034‐X ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.000187410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943‐5606.0001874 ↗
42. 10.1680/gein.2012.19.1.6210.1680/gein.2012.19.1.62 ↗
43. AASHTO (2020).Determination of Long‐Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington D. C. 20004.