journal article·2026-08

A Modified Inverse Analysis Method for Soil Parameters Considering the Spatial Structure of Soil Layers

Shijie Zhou, Hua Peng, Yan Bai, Runze Yu, Xiaoqi Xiao, Huihuan Zheng, Xiao He

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT When evaluating the impact of foundation pit excavation on adjacent existing metro structures through numerical simulation, it is essential to adopt a reasonable constitutive model and parameters. This study proposes an innovative inverse analysis method for soil parameters that considers the spatial structure of soil layers. Unlike traditional inverse analysis methods, this approach reconstructs the target parameters based on the spatial distribution characteristics of the soil layers, transforming discrete and independent parameters into a sequential structure (sequence). Using the reconstructed sequence as input and structural deformation as output, a surrogate model is established and combined with an optimization algorithm for inverse analysis of soil parameters. The proposed method was validated through numerical approaches, and the results demonstrate that, compared to conventional methods, the proposed method reduces the mean absolute error (MAE) of surrogate model predictions for structural deformations by up to 29.7% and decreases the MAE of numerical simulation results based on inversely analyzed parameters by up to 48.9%. Subsequently, the method was applied to an actual engineering project to verify the reliability of the soil parameters it provides. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to explore the interpretability of the machine learning model. The results indicate that the soil parameter not only contributes the most to the structural deformation but also interact strongly with other parameters. Furthermore, for the soil layers, the contribution of deeper soil layers to structural deformation is generally higher than that of the upper layers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing China

Railway Design Department Beijing Jiaoda Architectural Design and Engineering Survey Co. Ltd. Beijing China

Construction and Operation Department Beijing Jingtou Urban Utility Tunnel Investment Co. Ltd. Beijing China

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tust.2023.10529310.1016/j.tust.2023.105293 ↗
2. 10.3390/app1206302610.3390/app12063026 ↗
3. 10.3390/app1414635710.3390/app14146357 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2025.10943610.1016/j.jcsr.2025.109436 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10668310.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106683 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.04.00410.1016/j.undsp.2021.04.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.10605210.1016/j.tust.2024.106052 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.undsp.2020.06.00210.1016/j.undsp.2020.06.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.10566410.1016/j.tust.2024.105664 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tust.2022.10466210.1016/j.tust.2022.104662 ↗
11. 10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.37710.1680/geot.1986.36.3.377 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.10584510.1016/j.tust.2024.105845 ↗
13. 10.3390/buildings1311278410.3390/buildings13112784 ↗
14. Benz T. · 2007
15. 10.3390/app1503127810.3390/app15031278 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598‐025‐98186‐710.1038/s41598‐025‐98186‐7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.07.00310.1016/j.compgeo.2015.07.003 ↗
18. 10.1002/nag.101910.1002/nag.1019 ↗
19. 10.1002/nag.94910.1002/nag.949 ↗
20. 10.1002/nag.7009410.1002/nag.70094 ↗
21. 10.1002/nag.281210.1002/nag.2812 ↗
22. 10.1002/nag.374210.1002/nag.3742 ↗
23. X. H.Zhang “Deformation Prediction and Design of Excavation Supported by Earth Berm Based on Deep Learning Inverse Analysis ” (Master dissertation Zhengzhou University 2023).
24. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10659710.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106597 ↗
25. 10.3390/buildings1504053110.3390/buildings15040531 ↗
26. N.Wu “The Influence and Control of Foundation Pit Group Excavation on the Foundation Deformation of Adjacent Rail Transit Elevated Structure ” (Doctoral dissertation Southeast University 2021).
27. 10.3390/app1210499110.3390/app12104991 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.00710.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.007 ↗
29. 10.1002/nag.228710.1002/nag.2287 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.01610.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.016 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10531310.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105313 ↗
32. A.Lambora K.Gupta andK.Chopra “Genetic Algorithm‐ A Literature Review ” In:Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning Big Data Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon).IEEE;2019:380–384.10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862255 ↗
33. J.KennedyandR.Eberhart “Particle Swarm Optimization ” In:Proceedings of ICNN'95 ‐ International Conference on Neural Networks.4.IEEE;1995:1942–1948.10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 ↗
34. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.249421810.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.01910.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.019 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10591210.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105912 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.10140210.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101402 ↗
38. J.Sun Y.Fang H.Luo et al. “Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Rock Tunnel Deformation Prediction Based on Spatio‐temporal Patterns ” (2025):100–118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2024.04.008.10.1016/j.undsp.2024.04.008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10614910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106149 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12665‐025‐12346‐610.1007/s12665‐025‐12346‐6 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10651810.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106518 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598‐023‐43462‐710.1038/s41598‐023‐43462‐7 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11440‐021‐01385‐510.1007/s11440‐021‐01385‐5 ↗
44. Q.Xu X.Huang B.Zhang Z.Zhang J.Wang andS.Wang “TBM Performance Prediction Using LSTM‐based Hybrid Neural Network Model: Case Study of Baimang River Tunnel Project in Shenzhen ” (2023):130–152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2022.11.002.10.1016/j.undsp.2022.11.002 ↗
45. X.Men Y.Li B.Guo L.Wang X.Ye andQ.Pan.Advance Rate Predictions of Tunnel Boring Machines Using Bayesian‐Optimized CNN‐LSTM.ASCE‐ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A: Civil Engineering11 no.1(2025):04024086 https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG‐1451.10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1451 ↗
46. 10.1002/nag.329610.1002/nag.3296 ↗
47. A.Alourani F.Ashfaq N. Z.Jhanjhi andN.Ali Khan “BiLSTM‐ and GNN‐Based Spatiotemporal Traffic Flow Forecasting with Correlated Weather Data ” Truong L ed.Journal of Advanced Transportation(2023):1–17 https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8962283.10.1155/2023/8962283 ↗
48. 10.1002/nag.401610.1002/nag.4016 ↗
49. 10.1002/nag.367910.1002/nag.3679 ↗
50. X.Dong F.Zhou R.Zhu X. D.Wang andL. Y.Zeng “Sensitivity Analysis and Determination Method of Parameters for Hardening Soil Model With Small Strain Stiffness ”Science technology and engineering24 no.15(2024): 06366‐06311.10.1038/s41598-025-98186-7 ↗
51. On Sensitivity Estimation for Nonlinear Mathematical Models
52. 10.1002/978047072518410.1002/9780470725184 ↗
53. 10.1016/0022-4898(72)90110-310.1016/0022-4898(72)90110-3 ↗
54. N. P.Zhou “Application of Hardening Soil Model With Small‐strain in Deformation Analysis for Foundation Pit ” (Master dissertation Tongji University 2010).
55. 10.1139/t00‐10710.1139/t00‐107 ↗
56. Lundberg S. M. · 2017 · 4768
57. 10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.00110.1016/j.tust.2007.07.001 ↗