Development of In-Place Test Methods for Evaluating Printable Concretes
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Diggs-McGee, B. N., and Kreiger, E. L., “Using Isolated Temporal Analysis to Aid in the Assessment of Structural Element Quality for Additive Construction,” Standards Development for Cement and Concrete for Use in Additive Construction, S. Z. Jones and E. L. Kreiger, eds., 2021, pp. 117-143.10.1520/STP163620200105 ↗
2. Kreiger, E. L.; Kreiger, M. A.; and Case, M. P., “Development of the Construction Processes for Reinforced Additively Constructed Concrete,” Additive Manufacturing, V. 28, Aug. 2019, pp. 39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.01510.1016/j.addma.2019.02.015 ↗
3. Jagoda, J. A., “An Analysis of the Viability of 3D-Printed Construction as an Alternative to Conventional Construction Methods in the Expeditionary Environment,” master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 2020, 120 pp.
4. Buswell, R. A.; Leal de Silva, W. R.; Jones, S. Z.; and Dirrenberger, J., “3D Printing Using Concrete Extrusion: A Roadmap for Research,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006 ↗
5. Le, T. T.; Austin, S. A.; Lim, S.; Buswell, R. A.; Gibb, A. G. F.; and Thorpe, T., “Mix Design and Fresh Properties for High-Performance Printing Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 45, No. 8, Aug. 2012, pp. 1221-1232. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z ↗
6. Suiker, A. S. J.; Wolfs, R. J. M.; Lucas, S. M.; and Salet, T. A. M., “Elastic Buckling and Plastic Collapse during 3D Concrete Printing,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 135, Sept. 2020, Article No. 106016. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10601610.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106016 ↗
7. Roussel, N., “Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005 ↗
8. Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; He, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; and Bai, G., “Study on the Rheology and Buildability of 3D Printed Concrete with Recycled Coarse Aggregates,” Journal of Building Engineering, V. 42, Oct. 2021, Article No. 103030. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10303010.1016/j.jobe.2021.103030 ↗
9. Wolfs, R. J. M.; Bos, F. P.; and Salet, T. A. M., “Early Age Mechanical Behaviour of 3D Printed Concrete: Numerical Modelling and Experimental Testing,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 106, Apr. 2018, pp. 103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001 ↗
10. Panda, B.; Lim, J. H.; and Tan, M. J., “Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behaviour of Early Age Concrete in the Context of Digital Construction,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 165, May 2019, pp. 563-571. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.040 ↗
11. Voigt, T.; Malonn, T.; and Shah, S. P., “Green and Early Age Compressive Strength of Extruded Cement Mortar Monitored with Compression Tests and Ultrasonic Techniques,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 858-867. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.09.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2005.09.005 ↗
12. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; and Pang, B., “Fresh Properties of a Novel 3D Printing Concrete Ink,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 174, June 2018, pp. 263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.11510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.115 ↗
13. Hou, S.; Duan, Z.; Xiao, J.; and Ye, J., “A Review of 3D Printed Concrete: Performance Requirements, Testing Measurements and Mix Design,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 273, Mar. 2021, Article No. 121745. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12174510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121745 ↗
14. Kreiger, E.; Diggs-McGee, B.; Wood, T.; MacAllister, B.; and Kreiger, M., “Field Considerations for Deploying Additive Construction,” Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, F. P. Bos, S. S. Lucas, R. J. M. Wolfs, and T. A. M. Salet, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 1147-1163.10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_109 ↗
15. Tripathi, A.; Nair, S. A.O.; and Neithalath, N., “A Comprehensive Analysis of Buildability of 3D-Printed Concrete and the Use of Bi-Linear Stress-Strain Criterion-Based Failure Curves Towards Their Prediction,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 128, Apr. 2022, Article No. 104424.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104424 ↗
16. Kaplan, D.; de Larrard, F.; and Sedran, T., “Avoidance of Blockages in Concrete Pumping Process,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 102, No. 3, May-June 2005, pp. 183-191.10.14359/14446 ↗
17. Wangler, T.; Pileggi, R.; Gürel, S.; and Flatt, R. J., “A Chemical Process Engineering Look at Digital Concrete Processes: Critical Step Design, Inline Mixing, and Scaleup,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 155, May 2022, Article No. 106782. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10678210.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106782 ↗
18. Roussel, N., “A Thixotropy Model for Fresh Fluid Concretes: Theory, Validation and Applications,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 1797-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.02510.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.025 ↗
19. Rodriguez, F. B.; Olek, J.; Moini, R.; Zavattieri, P. D.; and Youngblood, J. P., “Linking Solids Content and Flow Properties of Mortars to Their Three-Dimensional Printing Characteristics,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 118, No. 6, Nov. 2021, pp. 371-382.10.14359/51733136 ↗
20. Tay, Y. W. D.; Qian, Y.; and Tan, M. J., “Printability Region for 3D Concrete Printing Using Slump and Slump Flow Test,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 174, Oct. 2019, Article No. 106968. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10696810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106968 ↗
21. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; She, W.; Yang, L.; Liu, G.; and Yang, Y., “Rheological and Harden Properties of the High-Thixotropy 3D Printing Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 201, Mar. 2019, pp. 278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.06110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.061 ↗
22. Roussel, N.; Buswell, R.; Ducoulombier, N.; Ivanova, I.; Kolawole, J. T.; Lowke, D.; Mechtcherine, V.; Mesnil, R.; Perrot, A.; Pott, U.; Reiter, L.; Stephan, D.; Wangler, T.; Wolfs, R.; and Zuo, W., “Assessing the Fresh Properties of Printable Cement-Based Materials: High Potential Tests for Quality Control,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 158, Aug. 2022, Article No. 106836. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10683610.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106836 ↗
23. ACI Committee 211, “Guide to Selecting Proportions for Pumpable Concrete (ACI 211.9R-18),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, 51 pp.
24. Haach, V. G.; Vasconcelos, G.; and Lourenço, P. B., “Influence of Aggregates Grading and Water/Cement Ratio in Workability and Hardened Properties of Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 6, June 2011, pp. 2980-2987. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.011 ↗
25. Hu, J., and Wang, K., “Effects of Size and Uncompacted Voids of Aggregate on Mortar Flow Ability,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 75-85. doi: 10.3151/jact.5.7510.3151/jact.5.75 ↗
26. API Specification 13A, “Specification for Drilling Fluids Materials,” 18th edition, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2010.
27. ASTM C926-22, “Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement-Based Plaster,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022, 14 pp.
28. ASTM C270-19, “Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 14 pp.
29. ASTM C476-20, “Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 4 pp.
30. Kosmatka, S. H., and Wilson, M. L., Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures: The Guide to Applications, Methods, and Materials, Engineering Bulletin 001, 15th edition, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2011, 460 pp.
31. Koehler, E. P., and Fowler, D. W., “Development of a Portable Rheometer for Fresh Portland Cement Concrete,” ICAR Report No. 105-3F, International Center for Aggregates Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Aug. 2004, 328 pp.
32. ACI Committee 305, “Guide to Hot Weather Concreting (ACI 305R-20),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2020, 28 pp.
33. ACI Committee 306, “Guide to Cold Weather Concreting (ACI 306R-16),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, 24 pp.