journal article·2017-04

Cold Model-Based Investigations to Study the Effects of Operational and Nonoperational Parameters on the Ruhrstahl–Heraeus Degassing Process

Deepjyoti Mukherjee, Ajay Kumar Shukla, Dieter G. Senk

Publisher page

Abstract

The circulation rate of steel is known to play a vital role in the superlative performance of the Ruhrstahl–Heraeus (RH) degasser. Numerous experiments were conducted on a physical model for the RH degassing process, which was established at IEHK, RWTH-Aachen University. The model was developed with a scale ratio of 1:3 to study the RH process. This study is conducted to show the effects of operational and nonoperational parameters on the circulation rate of liquid water in the model. The effects of lift gas flow rate, submerged depth of snorkels, water level in vessel, etc. on the circulation rate are studied. The mixing characteristics are studied with the help of current conductivity experiments for different lift gas flow rates and water levels in the vacuum vessel. Finally, the relationship between dimensionless numbers is derived with the help of the experimental data obtained from the cold model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. M.A. Van Ende, Y.M. Kim, M.K. Cho, J. Choi, and I.H. Jung: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2011, vol. 42B, pp. 477–89.10.1007/s11663-011-9495-4 ↗
2. T. Kuwabara, K. Umezawa, K. Mori, and H. Watanabe: Trans. ISIJ, 1988, vol. 28 (4), pp. 305–14.10.2355/isijinternational1966.28.305 ↗
3. V. Seshadri and S.L. De Souza Costa: Trans. ISIJ, 1986, vol. 26, pp. 133–38.10.2355/isijinternational1966.26.133 ↗
4. V. Seshadri, C.A. da Silva, I.A. da Silva, G.A. Vargas, and P.S.B. Lascosqui: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 34–38.10.1179/174328106X80019 ↗
5. S. Li, X. Ai, N. Wang, and N. Lv: Trans Tech Publications, 2011, vols. 287–290, pp. 840–43.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-290.840 ↗
6. L. Lin, Y. Bao, F. Yue, L. Zhang, and H. Ou: Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater., 2011, vol. 19, pp. 483–89.10.1007/s12613-012-0584-4 ↗
7. Ain A. Sonin: The Physical Basis of Dimensional Analysis, 2nd ed., MIT, Cambridge, 2001, pp. 1–53.
8. W. Ji-He: J. Shanghai Univ. (English Ed.), 2003, vol. 7 (1), pp. 1–17.10.1007/s11741-003-0044-5 ↗
9. G. Yang, X. Wang, F. Huang, W. Wang, and Y. Yin: Steel Res. Int., 2014, vol. 85, pp. 26–34.10.1002/srin.201300030 ↗
10. C. Yang, F. Tang, and M. Shen: TELKOMNIKA, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 670–77.10.12928/telkomnika.v13i2.999 ↗
11. O.J.H.H. Rakotobe and Dieter G. Senk: Untersuchungen zum Einschlusswachstum und zur Einschlussentfernung während der Pfannen- und RH-Vakuumbehandlung, IEHK, RWTH–Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2009, pp. 1–97.