journal article·2023-07Open access

Why Membranes Matter: Ion Exchange Membranes in Holistic Process Optimization of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Matthias Heßelmann, Hannah Minten, Tristan Geissler, Robert Gregor Keller, André Bardow, Matthias Wessling

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 7· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract Reducing carbon dioxide to value‐added chemicals by electrolysis is a promising strategy to substitute fossil‐based processes. Research on CO2 electrolysis has vastly progressed, focusing on catalysis and electrode design, leaving an essential question on the central part of the electrolyzer: Which type of ion exchange membrane is best suited for CO2 electrolysis from an economic perspective? To address this question, holistic process optimization of CO2 reduction and product purification is applied. The findings demonstrate that CO2 electrolysis with an anion exchange membrane shows competitive production costs for CO of 796 €/tCO, outperforming cation exchange and bipolar membranes. Unlike often described, the CO2 pumping effect does not significantly impair the economics but offers an efficient indirect regeneration of dissociated CO2. Furthermore, the results emphasize selective reduction of CO2 rather than co‐electrolysis of CO2 and H2O. While pointing to a positive economic perspective, life‐cycle assessment highlights the need to minimize CO2 emissions related to electricity consumption and incomplete CO2 utilization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Process Engineering RWTH Aachen University Forckenbeckstr. 51 52074 Aachen Germany

Chair of Technical Thermodynamics RWTH Aachen University Schinkelstr. 8 52062 Aachen Germany

Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering Energy and Process Systems Engineering ETH Zürich, Tannenstr. 3 Zürich 8092 Switzerland

DWI Leibniz‐Institute for Interactive Materials Forckenbeckstr. 50 52074 Aachen Germany

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.182102911610.1073/pnas.1821029116 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.abb806110.1126/science.abb8061 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.00810.1016/j.joule.2017.07.008 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7GC00398F10.1039/C7GC00398F ↗
5. 10.1149/2.0501815jes10.1149/2.0501815jes ↗
6. 10.1038/s41929-017-0005-110.1038/s41929-017-0005-1 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.9b1308110.1021/acsami.9b13081 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aay421710.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
9. 10.1002/celc.20200008910.1002/celc.202000089 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0071510.1021/acsaem.1c00715 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0101710.1021/acsenergylett.7b01017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.04510.1016/j.cej.2019.01.045 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0081910.1021/acs.iecr.7b00819 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.02110.1016/j.joule.2019.07.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.01510.1016/j.joule.2018.10.015 ↗
16. 10.1039/D0EE00047G10.1039/D0EE00047G ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-020-19135-810.1038/s41467-020-19135-8 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41560-020-00761-x10.1038/s41560-020-00761-x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.053 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0255010.1021/acs.macromol.5b02550 ↗
21. 10.1039/D0EE02589E10.1039/D0EE02589E ↗
22. 10.1039/C9EE01204D10.1039/C9EE01204D ↗
23. 10.1149/2.1221816jes10.1149/2.1221816jes ↗
24. 10.1038/s41929-022-00763-w10.1038/s41929-022-00763-w ↗
25. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0112210.1021/acsenergylett.1c01122 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7EE00345E10.1039/C7EE00345E ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.04.00710.1016/j.jcou.2019.04.007 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.1c1651310.1021/acsami.1c16513 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-022-31429-710.1038/s41467-022-31429-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11555710.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115557 ↗
31. 10.1039/D2EE03482D10.1039/D2EE03482D ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.1c2124210.1021/acsami.1c21242 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0229210.1021/acsenergylett.2c02292 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0098610.1021/acsaem.9b00986 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0235610.1021/acsenergylett.9b02356 ↗
36. 10.1039/D0SC03047C10.1039/D0SC03047C ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-022-31295-310.1038/s41467-022-31295-3 ↗
38. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac580e10.1149/1945-7111/ac580e ↗
39. 10.1002/cssc.20160039410.1002/cssc.201600394 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b0066510.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00665 ↗
41. 10.1039/C8EE00097B10.1039/C8EE00097B ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0351410.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.07.02410.1016/j.jcou.2019.07.024 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41893-021-00739-x10.1038/s41893-021-00739-x ↗
45. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0226310.1021/acsenergylett.1c02263 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11180710.1016/j.rser.2021.111807 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.46010.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.460 ↗
48. 10.1002/047002039310.1002/0470020393 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.00910.1016/j.rser.2012.08.009 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.02310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.023 ↗
51. 10.1039/C9GC04440J10.1039/C9GC04440J ↗
52. 10.1039/D0GC02831B10.1039/D0GC02831B ↗
53. J.Heuser H.Kauth C.Kords US Patent 6 930 202 2005.
54. 10.1021/ie50724a00610.1021/ie50724a006 ↗
55. 10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60001-810.1016/S1003-9953(08)60001-8 ↗
56. International Organization for Standardization Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html(accessed: October 2020).
57. Environmental management — life cycle assessment — requirements and guidelines https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html(accessed: October 2020).
58. S.Fazio F.Biganzioli V.De Laurentiis L.Zampori S.Sala E.Diaconu Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended ef life cycle impact assessment methods version 2 JRC Publications Repository Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg2018.
59. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.06410.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.064 ↗
60. 10.1002/elsa.20210016010.1002/elsa.202100160 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-021-24936-610.1038/s41467-021-24936-6 ↗
63. 10.1126/science.abg658210.1126/science.abg6582 ↗
64. 10.1038/s41929-022-00788-110.1038/s41929-022-00788-1 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23145310.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231453 ↗
66. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0497810.1021/acscatal.1c04978 ↗
67. A.Breitkopf Strompreise für industriekunden in ländern europas 2018 https://de.statista.com/(accessed: October 2020).
68. M.Gierkink D.Lencz F.Arnold Auswirkungen einer beendigung der kohleverstromung bis 2038 auf den strommarkt CO2‐emissionen und ausgewählte industrien: Eine analyse des abschlussberichts der wsb‐kommission.
69. IEA Norway ‐ Energy System Overview https://www.iea.org/countries/norway(accessed: May 2022).
70. 10.1038/s41560-022-01092-910.1038/s41560-022-01092-9 ↗
71. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0240110.1021/acsenergylett.0c02401 ↗
72. 10.1039/D2SE00858K10.1039/D2SE00858K ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.01110.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.011 ↗
74. 10.1039/D0RE00261E10.1039/D0RE00261E ↗
75. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00610.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
76. 10.1039/c3ra46630b10.1039/c3ra46630b ↗
77. 10.1126/science.117673110.1126/science.1176731 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.03710.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.037 ↗
79. 10.1038/s41467-022-30677-x10.1038/s41467-022-30677-x ↗
80. 10.1039/C6GC02852G10.1039/C6GC02852G ↗
81. T.Langhorst S.McCord A.Zimmermann L.Müller L.Cremonese T.Strunge Y.Wang A. V.Zaragoza J.Wunderlich A.Marxen K.Armstrong G.Buchner A.Kätelhön M.Bachmann A.Sternberg S.Michailos H.Naims B.Winter D.Roskosch G.Faber C.Mangin B.Olfe‐Kräutlein P.Styring R.Schomäcker A.Bardow V.Sick Techno‐economic assessment and life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2utilization (version 2.0) Technical Report Global CO2Initiative University of Michigan Michigan2022.https://doi.org/10.7302/4190.
82. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.16410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.164 ↗
83. 10.1039/C9GC90119A10.1039/C9GC90119A ↗
84. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.03210.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.032 ↗
85. 10.1021/ie402660s10.1021/ie402660s ↗
86. 10.1021/ie010808810.1021/ie0108088 ↗
87. 10.1039/C5RA00666J10.1039/C5RA00666J ↗
88. 10.1155/2017/425092710.1155/2017/4250927 ↗
89. 10.1021/ie901649510.1021/ie9016495 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.02910.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.029 ↗
91. 10.1021/ma00039a01810.1021/ma00039a018 ↗
92. Covestro AG Gas Phase Technology: 60% Less Energy Consumption https://www.covestro.com/(accessed: April 2021).
93. Manufacturing cost analysis of 10 kw and 25 kw direct hydrogen polymer electrolyte membrane (pem) fuel cell for material handling applications Technical Report Battelle Memorial Institute Columbus2013.
94. Biegler L. T. · 1997
95. Guthrie H. · Chem. Eng · 1969 · 32 · 114
96. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.03810.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.038 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.01910.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019 ↗
98. J. T.Smolinka M.Günther Studie: Stand und Entwicklungspotenzial der Wasserelektrolyse zur Herstellung von Wasserstoff aus regenerativen Energien https://www.now‐gmbh.de/projektfinder/studie‐wasserelektrolyse/(accessed: October 2020).
99. 10.1039/C9EE00914K10.1039/C9EE00914K ↗
100. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11459910.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114599 ↗