Bubble Size Measurement in a Continuous Casting Mold Using Physical Modeling and Shadowgraphy
Source abstract
Abstract
Argon gas injection into a continuous casting mold (vessel with moving liquid) helps in increasing the casting sequence length by avoiding SEN clogging. Bubble formation may create bubble-related steel defects at specific operating conditions. Parametric estimation of bubble size distribution (BSD) and mean bubble diameter may identify the type of unforeseen defect in cast slab. Physical modeling experiments were performed to estimate Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of the bubbles for different input parameters such as gas/liquid flow rates and liquid properties. High-speed high-resolution imaging and advanced image processing were used to capture images from the physical model. Four different simulating liquids were used in the physical modeling experiment. Bubble characteristic data were used to measure the SMDs (output data). Different values of SMDs were correlated with the input parameters using direct multilinear regression (DMR). Experimental and predicted values were found well in agreement with high R2. A dimensionless equation was also determined using the same data and compared with the DMR correlation. DMR correlation was compared and validated with the previous work related to the bubbly flows in stagnant and moving liquid flow regimes. As a result, it was concluded that an increasing gas flow rate, a decreasing liquid flow rate, an increasing surface tension, and an increasing viscosity increase the SMD of bubbles formed in the mold.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Thomas, A. Dennisov, and H. Bai, in Proc. of ISS Steelmaking Conf., Chicago 1997, 80, pp. 375–84
2. C. C. Maier, U. S. Bur. Mines Bull., 1927, No. 260, p. 62
3. T. Tadaki and S. Maeda: Chem. Eng., 1963, vol. 27, pp. 147–55. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu1953.27.147.10.1252/kakoronbunshu1953.27.147 ↗
4. L. Davidson and E.H. Amick Jr.: AIChE J., 1956, vol. 2, pp. 337–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690020309.10.1002/aic.690020309 ↗
5. I. Leibson, E.G. Holcomb, A.G. Cacoso, and J.J. Jamic: AIChe J., 1956, vol. 2, pp. 300–06.10.1002/aic.690020306 ↗
6. A. Mersmann, VDI-Forschllngshift 491, 1962, Vol. 28B, pp.1–3910.1088/0950-7671/39/9/436 ↗
7. M. Sano, K. Mori, and T. Sato: Tetsu-to-Hogane., 1974, vol. 60, pp. 348–60.10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.60.3_348 ↗
8. K. Akita and F. Yoshida: Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1974, vol. 13(1), pp. 84–90.10.1021/i260049a016 ↗
9. M. Sano and K. Moil: Trans. JIM (Japan)., 1976, vol. 17, pp. 344–52.10.2320/matertrans1960.17.344 ↗
10. A. Kumar, T.E. Degaleesan, G.S. Laddha, and H.E. Hoelscher: Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1976, vol. 54, pp. 503–08.10.1002/cjce.5450540525 ↗
11. M. Iguchi, T. Chiara, N. Takanashi, Y. Ogawa, N. Tokumitsu, and Z. Morita: ISIJ Int., 1995, vol. 35, pp. 1354–61.10.2355/isijinternational.35.1354 ↗
12. R. Pohorecki, W. Moniuk, P. Bielski, P. Sobieszuk, and G. Dabrowiecki: Chem. Eng. J., 2005, vol. 113, pp. 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.08.007.10.1016/j.cej.2005.08.007 ↗
13. G.A. Irons and R.I.L. Guthrie: Metall. Trans. B, 1978, vol. 9B, pp. 101–10.10.1007/BF02822677 ↗
14. K. Mori, M. Sano, and T. Sato: Trans. ISIJ, 1979, vol. 19, pp. 553–58.10.2355/isijinternational1966.19.553 ↗
15. M. Iguchi, T. Chihara, N. Takanashi, Y. Ogawa, N. Tokumitsu, and Z. Morita: ISIJ Int., 1995, vol. 35, pp. 1354–61.10.2355/isijinternational.35.1354 ↗
16. K. Akita and F. Yoshida: Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 1974, vol. 13, pp. 84–91.10.1021/i260049a016 ↗
17. L. L. van Dierendonck, Ph.D. Thesis, Chapter 2, University Twente, 1970
18. P. Bielski, Ph.D. Thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, 2002
19. G.A. Hughmark: Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 1967, vol. 6(2), pp. 218–20.10.1021/i260022a011 ↗
20. K. Idogawa, K. Ikeda, T. Fukuda, and S. Morooka: Int. Chem. Eng., 1986, vol. 26, pp. 468–74.
21. K. Idogawa, K. Ikeda, T. Fukuda, and S. Morooka: Int. Chem. Eng., 1987, vol. 27, pp. 93–99.
22. E. Sada, A. Yasunzshz, S. Katoh, and M. Nzshioka: Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1978, vol. 56, pp. 669–72.10.1002/cjce.5450560603 ↗
23. Y. Kawase and J.J. Ulbrecht: Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev., 1981, vol. 20(4), pp. 636–40.10.1021/i200015a009 ↗
24. C. Muilwijk and H.E.A. Vanden Akker: Chem. Eng. Sci., 2019, vol. 202, pp. 318–35.10.1016/j.ces.2019.03.026 ↗
25. P. Luty and M. Pronczuk: Processes, 2020, vol. 8, p. 999.10.3390/pr8080999 ↗
26. P.F. Wace, M.S. Morrell, and J. Woodrow: Chem. Eng. Commun., 1987, vol. 62, pp. 93–106.10.1080/00986448708912053 ↗
27. I. Kim, Y. Kamotani, and S. Ostrach: AIChE J., 1994, vol. 40(1), pp. 19–28.10.1002/aic.690400105 ↗
28. Y. Sahai and T. Emi: Tundish Technology for Clean Steel Production, 1st ed. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2008, pp. 20–21.
29. H. Bai and B.G. Thomas: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2001, vol. 32B, pp. 1143–59.10.1007/s11663-001-0102-y ↗
30. R. Banderas, R. Morales, R. Sanchez-Perez, L. Demedices, and G. Solorio-Diaz: Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 2005, vol. 31, p. 643.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2005.01.010 ↗
31. J. Klostermann, H. Chaves, and R. Schwarze: Steel Res. Int., 2007, vol. 78(8), pp. 595–601.10.1002/srin.200706254 ↗
32. S.M. Cho, B.G. Thomas, and S.H. Kim: ISIJ Int., 2018, vol. 58(8), pp. 1443–52.10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-096 ↗
33. M. Burty, M. Larrecq, C. Pusse, and Y. Zbaczyniak: 13th PTD Conf., Nashville, TN, 1995, vol. 13, pp. 287–92.
34. R. Sanchez-Perez, R. Morales, L. Demedices, J. Palafox-Ramos, and M. Díaz-Cruz: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2004, vol. 35B, pp. 85–99.10.1007/s11663-004-0099-0 ↗
35. R. Sanchez-Perez, R. Morales, M. Diaz-Cruze, O. Olivares-Xomet, and J. Palafox Ramos: ISIJ Int., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 637–46. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.43.637.10.2355/isijinternational.43.637 ↗
36. K. Jin, S. Vanka, and B. Thomas: Metall. Mater. Trans. B., 2018, vol. 49B, pp. 1360–77.10.1007/s11663-018-1191-1 ↗
37. T. Zhang, Z. Luo, H. Zhou, B. Ni, and Z. Zou: ISIJ Int., 2016, vol. 56(1), pp. 116–25.10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-456 ↗
38. K. Timmel, N. Shevchenko, M. Roder, M. Anderhuber, P. Gardin, S. Eckert, and G. Gerbet: Metall. Mater. Trans B, 2015, vol. 46B, pp. 700–10.10.1007/s11663-014-0231-8 ↗
39. K. Timmel, S. Eckert, G. Gerbeth, F. Stefani, and T. Wondrak: ISIJ Int., 2010, vol. 50, pp. 1134–41.10.2355/isijinternational.50.1134 ↗
40. A. Srivastava, R. Wang, S.K. Dinda, and K. Chattopadhyay: MLWA, 2021, vol. 6, p. 100180.
41. P. Kowalczuk and J. Drzymala: Particul. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 34, pp. 645–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2015.1099582.10.1080/02726351.2015.1099582 ↗
42. A. Srivastava and K. Chattopadhyay: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2022, vol. 53B, pp. 1018–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02396-z.10.1007/s11663-021-02396-z ↗
43. V. Singh, S. Dash, J. Sunitha, and S. Ajmani: ISIJ Int., 2006, vol. 46, pp. 210–18. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.46.210.10.2355/isijinternational.46.210 ↗
44. W. Chen, Y. Ren, L. Zhang, and P. Scheller: JOM, 2019, vol. 71, pp. 1158–68.10.1007/s11837-018-3255-8 ↗
45. A. Srivastava, S. K. Dinda, K. Chattopadhyay, and J. Sengupta, AISTech 2021, Proc. of the Iron & Steel Tech. Conf. Nashville, https://doi.org/10.33313/382/17210.33313/382/172 ↗
46. S. K. Dinda, A. Srivastava, K. Chattopadhyay, and J. Sengupta, AISTech 2021, Proc. of the Iron & Steel Tech. Conf. Nashville, https://doi.org/10.33313/382/17110.33313/382/171 ↗
47. A. Asgarian, Z. Yang, Z. Tang, M. Bussmann, and K. Chattopadhyay: Exp. Fluids, 2020, vol. 61, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2847-6.10.1007/s00348-019-2847-6 ↗
48. A. Srivastava, R. Wang, D. Li, and K. Chattopadhyay, Proc. Of AISTech 2020, pp. 803–13, https://doi.org/10.33313/380/08510.33313/380/085 ↗
49. P.M. Wilkinson, PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1991
50. Q. Wu, X. Wang, T. Wang, M. Han, Z. Sha, and J. Wang: Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2013, vol. 91, pp. 1957–63.10.1002/cjce.21788 ↗
51. G. Besagni, F. Inzoli, G. Deguido, and L.A. Pellegrini: Chem. Eng. Sci., 2016, vol. 158, pp. 509–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.11.003.10.1016/j.ces.2016.11.003 ↗
52. D. Laupsien, C.L. Men, A. Cockx, and A. Linè: Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.09.025.10.1016/j.cherd.2021.09.025 ↗
53. P. Zahedi, R. Saleh, R.M. Atanasio, and K. Yousefi: Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2014, vol. 31(8), pp. 1349–61.10.1007/s11814-014-0063-x ↗
54. F. Liu, H. Zhou, L. Zhang, C. Ren, J. Zhang, Y. Ren, and W. Chen: Steel Res. Int., 2021, vol. 92, p. 2100067. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202100067.10.1002/srin.202100067 ↗
55. Y. Liao and D. Lucas: Chem. Eng. Sci., 2009, vol. 64, pp. 3389–406.10.1016/j.ces.2009.04.026 ↗
56. Y. Liao and D. Lucas: Chem. Eng. Sci., 2010, vol. 65(10), pp. 2851–64.10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.020 ↗