journal article·2000-08

Evaporation behavior of aluminum during the cold crucible induction skull melting of titanium aluminum alloys

Jingjie Guo, Jun Jia, Yuan Liu, Guizhong Liu, Yanqing Su, Hongsheng Ding

Publisher page

Abstract

Taking the Ti-Al binary alloy as an example, this article studied the evaporation behavior of Al during the cold crucible induction skull melting (ISM) process of titanium alloys. A formula was deduced to predict the activity of Al in a molten Ti-Al binary system. The calculated activity of Al negatively deviates from an ideal solution. A model was established to judge the evaporation controlling mode and, on this basis, several conclusions were obtained. (1) The evaporation controlling mode of Al in molten Ti-Al transfers from the evaporation reaction controlling mode to the double controlling mode (diffusion and evaporation reaction) with increasing melt temperature (Tms) and/or Al content (xAl) and/or decreasing pressure (P) in the melting chamber. (2) The expression P≤Pcrit (Pcrit≈0.44 Pe(Al)) is a criterion used to judge whether the evaporation is in the state of free evaporation. (3) The term Pimpe (Pimpe=(3.5 to 4) Pe(Al)) is a critical value which impedes the evaporation loss. Almost all of common used ternary additions could enhance the activity of Al in molten Ti-Al and, accordingly, aggravate the evaporation of Al, except for Zr. The enhancing sequence is Y, Ni, Nb, Mn, V, Fe, Cr, Mo, Cu, Si, W, Mg, B, and Sn. The Al evaporation mass-transfer losses, measured from the melting experiments of several titanium aluminum alloys, were in reasonable agreement with the calculated results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Rodney Boger: JOM, 1992, vol. 44 (5), pp. 23–25.10.1007/BF03223045 ↗
2. H.B. Bomberger and F.H. Froes: JOM, 1984, vol. 36 (12), pp. 39–47.10.1007/BF03339212 ↗
3. James W. Sears: JOM, 1990, vol. 42 (3), pp. 17–21.10.1007/BF03220888 ↗
4. K. Sakamoto, K. Yoshikawa, T. Kusamichi, and T. Onoye: in Induction and Electron Beam Melting, ISIJ International, 1992, vol. 32 (4), pp. 616–24.
5. S. Mitao and K. Minakawa: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. 143A, pp. 51–62.10.1016/0921-5093(91)90725-3 ↗
6. R.G. Ward: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1963, Jan. pp. 11–15.
7. L.L. Rishel, T.M. Pollock, and A.W. Cramb: Proc. 1999 Int. Symp. on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, Santa Fe, NM, Feb. 21–24, 1999.
8. Y.O. Esin, N.P. Bobrov, M.S. Petrusheskiy, P.V. Gel*d, and Teplofiz: Vysok Temper, 1975, vol. 13, pp. 84–87.
9. Y.O. Esin, N.P. Bobrov, M.S. Petrusheskiy, and P.V. Gel*d: Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Met., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 104–08.
10. G.I. Batalin, E.A. Baloborodova, V.V. Nerubashenko, and A.N. Shlapak: Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Met., 1981, vol. 1, pp. 69–71.
11. Masafumi Maeda, Tomoyoshi Kiwake, Katsuhiho Shibuya, and Takashi Ikeda: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1997, vol. A239, pp. 276–80.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00593-5 ↗
12. N.A. Gokcen, T. Tanaka, and Z. Morita: J. Chem. Phys., 1993, vol. 90, pp. 233–248.
13. A.R. Midema, and P.F. Chatel: Physica, 1980, vol. 100B (1), pp. 1–28.
14. E.S. Machlin: Trans. AIME, 1960, vol. 218, pp. 314–25.
15. Kang Xiandeng: Vacuum Metallurgy, Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, 1980, pp. 44.
16. E.T. Turdkogan: Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980, pp. 5.
17. I. Langmuir: Phys. Rev., 1913, vol. 2, pp. 329–34.10.1103/PhysRev.2.329 ↗
18. B. Ilschner and I. Humbert: Z. Metallkd., 1960, vol. 51, pp. 626–28.