New Insight into Toughness Enhancement in a Lath Martensitic Steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Grain refinement of the parent austenite led to a significant change in the intervariant boundary network of martensite, ultimately improving the mechanical properties (i.e., toughness and hardness). Molecular dynamics simulation demonstrated that the propensity for crack propagation was largely governed by the intervariant boundary energy, where the crack propagation rate was much faster for the high-energy 60 deg/[110] twist boundary than the low-energy 60 deg/[111] symmetric tilt boundary. This agreed with experimental observations where parent austenite grain refinement increased the low-energy boundary population at the expense of high-energy intervariant boundaries in martensite. In turn, this led to a significant toughness improvement without sacrificing the strength. This finding demonstrates that the mechanical properties of a martensitic microstructure can be significantly improved through intervariant boundary network engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Y. Mine, K. Hirashita, H. Takashima, M. Matsuda, and K. Takashima: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, vol. 560, pp. 535–44.10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.099 ↗
2. C. Du, J.P.M. Hoefnagels, R. Vaes, and M.G.D. Geers: Scripta Mater., 2016, vol. 116, pp. 117–21.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.043 ↗
3. J.J. Jonas: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2013, vol. 753, pp. 546–53.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.753.546 ↗
4. J.J. Jonas, M.P. Butrón-Guillén, and J. Savoie: ISIJ Int., 1994, vol. 34, pp. 927–42.10.2355/isijinternational.34.927 ↗
5. R.K. Ray and J.J. Jonas: Int. Mater. Rev., 1990, vol. 35, pp. 1–36.10.1179/095066090790324046 ↗
6. H. Beladi, G.L. Kelly, and P.D. Hodgson: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2007, vol. 38A, pp. 450–63.10.1007/s11661-006-9080-7 ↗
7. A. Mirzaei, R. Ghaderi, P.D. Hodgson, X. Ma, G.S. Rohrer, and H. Beladi: J. Mater. Sci., 2022, vol. 57, pp. 8904–23.10.1007/s10853-022-07204-w ↗
8. A. Mirzaei, P.D. Hodgson, X. Ma, V.K. Peterson, E. Farabi, G.S. Rohrer, and H. Beladi: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2024, vol. 889, 145793.10.1016/j.msea.2023.145793 ↗
9. V. Govindaraj, E. Farabi, S. Kada, P.D. Hodgson, R. Singh, G.S. Rohrer, and H. Beladi: J. Alloys Compd., 2021, vol. 886, 161333.10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161333 ↗
10. R. Barbosa, F. Boratto, S. Yue, and J.J. Jonas, in Proc. of the Inter. Con. on Proc. Microstructure and Properties of HSLA Steels, The Mineral, Metals and Materials Society, 1987, pp. 51–56.
11. G. Miyamoto, N. Iwata, N. Takayama, and T. Furuhara: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 1139–48.10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.018 ↗
12. K.H. Kim, H.J. Kim, and J.W. Morris: Met. Trans. A, 1986, vol. 17, pp. 1157–64.10.1007/BF02665314 ↗
13. X. Xu, Y. Tian, Q. Ye, R.D.K. Misra, and Z. Wang: Steel Res. Int., 2021, vol. 92, pp. 2100274–89.10.1002/srin.202100274 ↗
14. T. Watanabe and S. Tsurekawa: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, vol. 387–389, pp. 447–55.10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.140 ↗
15. H. Beladi, G.S. Rohrer, A.D. Rollett, V. Tari, and P.D. Hodgson: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 63, pp. 86–98.10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.010 ↗
16. C. Celada-Casero, J. Sietsma, and M.J. Santofimia: Mater. Des., 2019, vol. 167, pp. 107625–34.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107625 ↗
17. T. Furuhara, K. Kikumoto, H. Saito, T. Sekine, T. Ogawa, S. Morito, and T. Maki: ISIJ Int., 2008, vol. 48, pp. 1038–45.10.2355/isijinternational.48.1038 ↗
18. www.nist.gov/programs-projects/charpy-machine-verification-program.
19. H. Tervo, A. Kaijalainen, T. Pikkarainen, S. Mehtonen, and D. Porter: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 697, pp. 184–93.10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.013 ↗
20. H. Lan, L. Du, and R. Misra: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, vol. 611, pp. 194–200.10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.084 ↗
21. J. Han, A.K. da Silva, D. Ponge, D. Raabe, S.-M. Lee, Y.-K. Lee, S.-I. Lee, and B. Hwang: Acta Mater., 2017, vol. 122, pp. 199–206.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.048 ↗
22. H. Beladi, V. Tari, A.D. Rollett, and G.S. Rohrer: Scripta Mater., 2023, vol. 222, 115042.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115042 ↗
23. W. Schubert, H. Neumeister, G. Kinger, and B. Lux: Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., 1998, vol. 16, pp. 133–42.10.1016/S0263-4368(98)00028-6 ↗
24. T. Tomida, M. Wakita, M. Yasuyama, S. Sugaya, Y. Tomota, and S.C. Vogel: Acta Mater., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 2828–39.10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.015 ↗
25. Z. Guo, C. Lee, and J.W. Morris: Acta Mater., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 5511–18.10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.011 ↗
26. A. Shibata, H. Takahashi, and N. Tsuji: ISIJ Int., 2012, vol. 52, pp. 208–12.10.2355/isijinternational.52.208 ↗
27. H. Beladi and G.S. Rohrer: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 2781–90.10.1007/s11661-016-3630-4 ↗
28. B. Hutchinson, J. Komenda, G.S. Rohrer, and H. Beladi: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 97, pp. 380–91.10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.055 ↗
29. A. Mirzaei, C. Bennett, X. Ma, P.D. Hodgson, and H. Beladi: Materialia, 2022, vol. 25, 151039.10.1016/j.mtla.2022.101539 ↗
30. A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. In’tveld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S.J. Plimpton: Comput. Phys. Commun., 2022, vol. 271, p. 108171.10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
31. M. Wen: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2021, vol. 197, pp. 110640–46.10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110640 ↗
32. M.A. Tschopp and D.L. McDowell: Philos. Magn., 2007, vol. 87, pp. 3147–73.10.1080/14786430701255895 ↗
33. A. Stukowski: Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, vol. 18, p. 015012.10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
34. J. Kang, C. Wang, and G.D. Wang: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, vol. 553, pp. 96–104.10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.098 ↗