Modeling of Strain Hardening in the Aluminum Alloy AA6061
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the evolution of work-hardening and dynamic recovery rates vs the flow stress increase (σ − σ y ) in Al-Mg-Si alloys is presented. The experimental data have been extracted from stress–strain curves. All curves show an initial very rapid decrease in slope of the σ–e curve, which is associated with the elastic–plastic transition. After the elastic–plastic transition, there are typically two distinctive behaviors. For underaged alloys, there is an approximately linear decrease of work-hardening rate as (σ − σ y ) increases. However, for overaged alloys after elastic–plastic transition, there is a plateau in the work-hardening rate followed by an almost linear decrease. The maximum work-hardening and dynamic recovery rates are found to be dependent on the aging state. In order to investigate these phenomena, a model has been employed to simulate the work-hardening behavior of Al-Mg-Si alloys. The model is based on a modified version of Kocks–Mecking–Estrin (KME) model, in which there are three main components: (1) hardening due to forest dislocations, grain boundaries, and sub-grains; (2) hardening due to the precipitates; and (3) dynamic recovery. The modeling results are discussed and compared with the experimental data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. U.F. Kocks, J. Eng Mater Technol., 1976, vol. 98, pp. 76-85.10.1115/1.3443340 ↗
2. H. Mecking and U.F. Kocks, Acta Metall, 1981, vol. 29, pp. 1865-75.10.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7 ↗
3. E. Nes, Prog. Mater. Sci., 1997, vol. 41, pp. 129-93.10.1016/S0079-6425(97)00032-7 ↗
4. K. Marthinsen and E. Nes, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, vols. 234-236, pp. 1095-98.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00349-3 ↗
5. U.F. Kocks, Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 2109-19.10.1007/BF02670415 ↗
6. B. Holmedal, Ø. Ryen, E. Nes, O.R. Myhr, Ø. Grong, T. Furu, K. Marthinsen, Mater Sci. Forum, 2006, vol. 519–521, pp. 1901-06.
7. L.M. Cheng, W.J. Poole, J.D. Embury, and D.J. Lloyd, Metall. Mater. Trans., 2003, vol. 34A, pp. 2473-84.10.1007/s11661-003-0007-2 ↗
8. J.D. Embury, W.J. Poole, and D.J. Lloyd, Mater Sci. Forum, 2006, vol. 519–521, pp. 71-77.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.71 ↗
9. U.F. Kocks and H. Mecking, Prog. Mater Sci. 48 (2003) 171-273.10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗
10. W.J. Poole and D.J. Lloyd: Proceeding of the 9th Int. Conference on Al Alloys, 2004, Brisbane, pp. 939–45.
11. A. Simar, Y. Bréchet, B. de Meester, A. Denquin, and T. Pardoen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 486 (1–2), pp. 85–95.10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.041 ↗
12. A. Simar: Ph.D. Thesis, July 2006, p. 153.
13. O.R. Myhr, Ø. Grong, S.J. Andersen, Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 65–75.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00301-3 ↗
14. D.J. Lloyd, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2006, vol. 55, pp. 519-21.
15. J.W. Martin: Micromechanics in Particle-Hardened Alloys, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980, p. 73.
16. P.B. Hirsch and F.J. Humphreys, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1970, vol. 318, pp. 45-73.10.1098/rspa.1970.0133 ↗