Effect of Mold Coating Materials and Thickness on Heat Transfer in Permanent Mold Casting of Aluminum Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
In permanent mold casting or gravity die casting (GDC) of aluminum alloys, die coating at the casting-mold interface is the most important single factor controlling heat transfer and, hence, it has the greatest influence on the solidification rate and development of microstructure. This investigation studies the influence of coating thickness, coating composition, and alloy composition on the heat transfer at the casting-mold interface. Both graphite and TiO2-based coatings have been investigated. Two aluminum alloys have been investigated: Al-7Si-0.3Mg and Al-9Si-3Cu. Thermal histories throughout the die wall have been recorded by fine type-K thermocouples. From these measurements, die surface temperatures and heat flux density have been evaluated using an inverse method. Casting surface temperature was measured by infrared pyrometry, and the interfacial heat-transfer coefficient (HTC) has been determined using these combined pieces of information. While the alloy is liquid, the coating material has only a weak influence over heat flow and the thermal contact resistance seems to be governed more by coating porosity and thickness. The HTC decreases as the coating thickness increases. However, as solidification takes place and the HTC decreases, the HTC of graphite coating remains higher than that of ceramic coatings of similar thickness. After the formation of an air gap at the interface, the effect of coating material vanishes. The peak values of HTC and the heat flux density are larger for Al-7Si-0.3Mg than for Al-9Si-3Cu. Consequently, the apparent solidification time of Al-9Si-3Cu is larger than that of Al-7Si-0.3Mg and it increases with coating thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Granular flow and fluidized beds · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. F. Chiesa: AFS Trans., 1998, 106: 589–94
2. C. Wu, V. Sahajwalla, R.D. Pehlke: AFS Trans., 1998, 105:739–44
3. D. Tomasevic: Fonderie-Fondeur d’aujourd’hui, 2004, 236:20–32 (in French and English)
4. F. Chiesa: AFS Trans., 1990, 98:193–200
5. G. Sciama, J.-F. Ribou, and CTIF: Fonderie-Fondeur d’aujourd’hui, 1997, vol. 169, pp. 23–62 (in French)
6. D. Tomasevic, Y. Longa, A. Silva: Fonderie-Fondeur d’aujourd’hui, 2005, 245:21–30 (in French and English)
7. V. Davies: Br. Foundryman, 1980, 73:331–34
8. C.P. Hallam, W.D. Griffiths: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2004, 35B:721–3310.1007/s11663-004-0012-x ↗
9. M.Z. Jahedi, M. Giannos: Mater. Australia, 2000, 33:20–22
10. P. Schmidt: Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1994
11. G. Dour, M. Dargusch, C. Davidson, A. Nef: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 169:223–3310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.026 ↗
12. G. Dour, M. Dargusch, C. Davidson: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2006, 49:1773–8910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.10.045 ↗
13. PP. Hervé: Technique de l’ingénieur, 1989, Doc R 2735 (in French)
14. PP. Hervé: Technique de l’ingénieur, 1989, Doc. R 2737 (in French)
15. Infrared Thermometers, User’s Manual, Mikron Instrument Company, New Jersey, 1998, p. 23
16. Impac Electronic GmbH (collective work): The Pyrometer Handbook, Frankfurt, 1999, pp. 16–27
17. Y.-H. Chen, Y.-T. Im: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 1990, 30:175–8910.1016/0890-6955(90)90128-6 ↗
18. S. Broucaret, A. Michrafy, G. Dour: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2001, 110:211–1710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00881-5 ↗
19. The Temperature Handbook, Omega, Omega Ldt, Manchester, UK, 2002
20. Quel Thermocouple Choisir?, Thermocoax S.A., Lyon, 2002, pp. 2–31
21. F. Medjedoub: Ph.D. Thesis, École des Mines d’Albi-Carmaux, Albi, France, 2004, pp. 27–30
22. V. Camille, V. Florian, A. Hamasaiid, and G. Dour: Report Project ANCC, EMAC, Albi, France, 2006
23. G. Fortin, P.R. Louchez, F.H. Samuel: Rev. Metall./Cah. Inf. Technol., 1994, 9(5):771–8010.1051/metal/199491050771 ↗
24. J. Issac, G.P. Reddy, and G.K. Sharma.: Br. Foundryman, 1985, pp. 465–68
25. M. Bamberger, B.Z. Weiss, M.M. Stuple: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1987, 3:49–5610.1179/mst.1987.3.1.49 ↗
26. F. Michel, P.R. Louchez, F.H. Samuel: AFS Trans., 1995, 103:275–83
27. T.-G. Kim, Z.-H. Lee: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1997, 40(15):3513–2510.1016/S0017-9310(97)00023-9 ↗
28. K.N. Parbhu, W.D. Griffith: J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2002, 18(7):804–1010.1179/026708302225003884 ↗
29. S. Wei, J. Dillingham, M.R. Jiranek, K. Nyamekye, C.W. Ramsay, D.R. Askeland, R. Pischel: AFS Trans., 1996, 104:251–62
30. J.C. Hwang, H.T. Chuang, S.H. Jong, W.S. Hwang: AFS Trans., 1994, 102:877–83
31. G. Dour: Fonderie-Aide-Mémoire, 1st ed., Dunod, Paris, 2004, pp. 151–57
32. F. Decultieux: Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris, 1996
33. M. Prates, H. Biloni: Metall. Trans., 1972, 3:1501–1010.1007/BF02643039 ↗
34. I.F. Bainbridge: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, 2005, pp. 128–35