Linear Relationship Between dV/dt and Grain Volume During Grain Growth
Source abstract
Abstract
The volumetric growth rate of individual grains has been found empirically to be directly proportional to their individual volume, dV/dt = β(V0 − V). This simple result extends from the relationship $${\mathrm{d}}V/{\mathrm{d}}t=-k{M}_{\mathrm{S}},$$ where MS is integral mean curvature of the boundaries of individual grains and k the grain growth rate constant, and the experimentally observed linear relationship between $${M}_{\mathrm{S}}$$ and individual grain volume, $${M}_{\mathrm{S}}$$ = α(V0 − V). Here, α is a scaling parameter that collapses the relationships for separate times of growth into a single trend. It has been shown that α = $$\gamma {\bar{V}}-2/3$$ where γ is an experimentally determined constant ≃ − 2.7 and $${\bar{V}}$$ is the mean grain volume. Thus, β = −kα = 2.7k $${\bar{V}}-2/3$$ , simply proportional to the scale of the overall grain structure. These relationships have been tested successfully in numerous 3D grain growth simulations and experiments. This paper describes the relationships among these kinetic and geometric grain characteristics that provide this surprisingly simple description of 3D grain growth, i.e., a linear relationship between the growth rate of an individual grain and its volume.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. R.T. DeHoff, B.R. Patterson, C.A. Sahi, and S. Chiu: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 100, pp. 240–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.011.10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.011 ↗
2. C.A. Sahi: The Role of Integral Mean Curvature in Grain Growth, Dissertation, University of Florida, 2018.
3. B.R. Patterson, R.T. DeHoff, C.A. Sahi, J. Sun, J. Oddershede, F. Bachmann, E. Lauridsen, and D. Juul Jensen: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, vol. 580https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/012020.10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/012020 ↗
4. J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. Ludwig, D. Rowenhorst, P. Voorhees, and H.F. Poulsen: Acta Mater., 2018, vol. 156, pp. 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.06.021.10.1016/j.actamat.2018.06.021 ↗
5. C.G. Cardona, V. Tikare, B.R. Patterson, and E. Olevsky: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2012, vol. 95, pp. 2357–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05164.x.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05164.x ↗
6. R.T. DeHoff: Metall. Trans. A., 1971, vol. 2A, pp. 521–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663343.10.1007/BF02663343 ↗
7. Z. Fang, B.R. Patterson, and M.E. Turner Jr.: Metall. Trans. A., 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03350945.10.1007/BF03350945 ↗
8. B.R. Patterson and T. Kaub: Unpublished Research, University of Florida, 2014.
9. R.T. DeHoff: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME., 1967, vol. 239, pp. 617–21. .
10. J.W. Cahn: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME., 1967, vol. 239, pp. 610–6. .
11. R.T. DeHoff and G.Q. Liu: Metall. Trans. A., 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 2007–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662401.10.1007/BF02662401 ↗
12. D.J. Rowenhorst, A.C. Lewis, and G. Spanos: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 5511–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.030.10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.030 ↗
13. R.T. DeHoff: in Microstructural Science. J.D. Braun, H.W. Arrowsmith, and J.L. McCall, eds., Elsevier, New York, 1977, pp. 331–48.
14. R.D. MacPherson and D.J. Srolovitz: Nature., 2007, vol. 446, pp. 1053–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05745.10.1038/nature05745 ↗
15. E.A. Lazar, J.K. Mason, R.D. MacPherson, and D.J. Srolovitz: Acta Mater., 2011, vol. 59, pp. 6837–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.052.10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.052 ↗
16. X. Zhong, D.J. Rowenhorst, H. Beladi, and G.S. Rohrer: Acta Mater., 2017, vol. 123, pp. 136–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.030.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.030 ↗
17. F.C. Hull: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1988, vol. 4, pp. 778–85. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1988.4.9.778.10.1179/mst.1988.4.9.778 ↗
18. J.W. Cahn and W.C. Hagel: Acta Metall., 1963, vol. 11, pp. 561–74. .10.1016/0001-6160(63)90090-7 ↗
19. J. von Neumann: Written Discussion in Metal Interfaces. American Society for Metals, Cleveland, 1952, pp. 108–10.
20. W.W. Mullins: J. Appl. Phys., 1956, vol. 27, pp. 900–4. .10.1063/1.1722511 ↗
21. D. Harker and E.R. Parker: Trans. ASM., 1945, vol. 34, pp. 156–95. .
22. C.S. Smith: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME., 1948, vol. 175, pp. 15–51. .
23. H. Minkowski: Math. Ann., 1903, vol. 57, pp. 447–95. .10.1007/BF01445180 ↗
24. R.T. DeHoff and F.N. Rhines eds., Quantitative Microscopy, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
25. S. Plimpton, A. Thompson, and A. Slepoy: SPPARKS kinetic Monte Carlo simulator, 2011. https://spparks.sandia.gov/index.html, https://spparks.sandia.gov/pdf/sand09.pdf.
26. M.P. Anderson, G.S. Grest, and D.J. Srolovitz: Philos. Mag. B., 1989, vol. 59, pp. 293–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642818908220181.10.1080/13642818908220181 ↗
27. E.A. Holm and C.C. Battaile: JOM., 2001, vol. 53, pp. 20–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0063-2.10.1007/s11837-001-0063-2 ↗
28. http://dream3d.bluequartz.net/. Accessed 28 April 2019.
29. C. Zhang, M. Enomoto, A. Suzuki, and T. Ishimaru: Metall. Mater. Trans. A., 2004, vol. 35A, pp. 1927–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0141-5.10.1007/s11661-004-0141-5 ↗
30. F.N. Rhines and B.R. Patterson: Metall. Trans. A., 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 985–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02643395.10.1007/BF02643395 ↗
31. R.T. DeHoff and B.R. Patterson: Acta Mater., 2020, vol. 201, pp. 403–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.086.10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.086 ↗