Finite Element and Experimental Analyses on the Formability of Steel Sheets Produced by Compact Endless Cast and Rolling
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the compact endless cast and rolling mill (CEM) is a promising candidate as a next-generation energy-saving steel process, due to its short history, the formability of the steel sheet produced by the CEM process are not known yet. Herein, drawability and stretchability of low-carbon steel sheets produced by the CEM process are investigated and compared with those of conventional hot-rolled low-carbon steel sheets, to estimate its applicability to industrial parts. Finite element analyses using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman damage model were conducted and compared with the experimental results. Homogeneous microstructure and relatively strong textures of {111}||ND γ-fibers and 〈110〉||RD α-fibers were developed in the CEM-processed steel in comparison with the conventional hot-rolled specimen. The drawn cup of the CEM specimen showed weak earing phenomena, while having higher limiting drawing ratios (2.0 and 1.95 in the experimental and numerical simulation, respectively). Furthermore, a difference in limit dome height between the two specimens is negligible. Therefore, it is confirmed that CEM-processed steels have comparable properties of strength and formability, provide an effective manufacturing process, and exhibit good potential as a next-generation energy-saving process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 1. K. R. Ravi, R. M. Pillai, K. R. Amaranathan, B. C. Pai and M. Chakraborty, J. Alloys Compd., 2008, vol. 456, pp. 201-10.10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.02.038 ↗
2. 2. B. L. Mordike and T. Ebert, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, vol. 302, pp. 37-45.10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01351-4 ↗
3. 3. H. S. Kim, S-H. Joo and H. J. Jeong, Korean J. Met. Mater., 2014, vol. 52, pp. 87-99.10.3365/KJMM.2014.52.2.87 ↗
4. 4. J. De Beer, E. Worrel and K. Blok, Annu. Rev. Energy Env., 1998, vol. 23, pp. 123-205.10.1146/annurev.energy.23.1.123 ↗
5. 5. C. P. Manning and R. J. Fruehan, JOM, 2001, vol. 53, pp. 36-43.10.1007/s11837-001-0054-3 ↗
6. D. Banabic, Formability of Metallic Materials: Plastic Anisotropy, Formability Testing, Forming Limits, Springer, New York, 2000.10.1007/978-3-662-04013-3 ↗
7. 7. Y.-M. Huang and J.-W. Chen, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1995, vol. 55, pp. 360-69.10.1016/0924-0136(95)02039-X ↗
8. 8. R. K. Saxena and P. M. Dixit, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 2011, vol. 47, pp. 1104-17.10.1016/j.finel.2011.04.003 ↗
9. 9. R. K. Saxena and P. M. Dixit, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2009, vol. 45, pp. 219-33.10.1007/s00170-009-1963-5 ↗
10. 10. R. D. Butler and D. V. Wilson, J. Inst. Met., 1962, vol. 90, pp. 473-83.
11. 11. D. Raabe, Y. Wang and F. Roters, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2005, vol. 34, pp. 221-34.10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.12.072 ↗
12. 12. H. Inoue and T. Takasugi, Mater. Trans., 2007, vol. 48, pp. 2014-22.10.2320/matertrans.L-MRA2007871 ↗
13. 13. M. M. Humane, R. K. Minj, D. R. Peshwe and R .K. Paretkar, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 1692-1708.10.1007/s11661-010-0552-4 ↗
14. 14. E. Nakamachi, C. L. Xie and M. Harimoto, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2001, vol. 43, pp. 631-52.10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00048-5 ↗
15. 15. R. Saha and R. K. Ray, Metall. Mater. Trans. 2009, vol. 40A, pp. 2160-70.10.1007/s11661-009-9901-6 ↗
16. 16. J. M. Story, J. App. Metalworking, 1982, vol. 2, pp. 119-25.10.1007/BF02834209 ↗
17. D. J. Meuleman, J. L. Sues and J. J. Zoldak: Report No. 850005, SAE Technical Paper, 1985.
18. 18. J. I. Yoon, J. G. Kim, J. M. Jung, D. J. Lee, H. J. Jeong, M. Shahbaz, S. Lee and H. S. Kim, Korean J. Met. Mater., 2016, vol. 54, pp. 231-36.10.3365/KJMM.2016.54.4.231 ↗
19. 19. Z. Marciniak and K. Kuczyński, Inter. J. Mech. Sci., 1967, vol. 9, pp. 609-20.10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
20. 20. R. A. Ayres, W. G. Brazier and V. F. Sajewski, J. App. Metalworking, 1978, vol. 1, pp. 41-49.10.1007/BF02833958 ↗
21. 21. D. P Field, Ultramicroscopy, 1997, vol. 67, pp. 1-9.10.1016/S0304-3991(96)00104-0 ↗
22. 22. R Hill: The mathematical theory of plasticity, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1950.
23. 23. V. Tvergaard and A. Needleman, Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 157-69.10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
24. 24. K. S. Choi, J. H. Hwang, K. Lee and K. S. Shin, Korean J. Met. Mater., 2015, vol. 53, pp. 569-77.10.3365/KJMM.2015.53.8.569 ↗
25. 25. H. Kim, D. Kim, K. Ahn, D. Yoo, H.-S. Son, G.-S. Kim and K. Chung, Met. Mater. Int., 2015, vol. 21, pp. 874-90.10.1007/s12540-015-5141-z ↗
26. ABAQUS/Standard, ABAQUS, Inc., Providence, RI, 2009.
27. 27. H. J. Bunge, Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Butterworths, Londen England, 1982.
28. 28. S. Takaki, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2010, vol. 638-642, pp. 168-73.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.638-642.168 ↗
29. 29. K. Takeda, N. Nakada, T. Tsuchiyama and S. Takaki, ISIJ Int., 2008, vol. 48, pp. 1122-25.10.2355/isijinternational.48.1122 ↗
30. 30. S. Takaki, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2012, vol. 706-709, pp. 181-85.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.181 ↗
31. 31. X. C. Sha, D .Z. Li, Y. T. Zhang, X. G. Zhang and Y. Y. Li, Ironmak. Steelmak., 2004, vol. 31, pp. 169-75.10.1179/030192304225011106 ↗
32. M. Hoslscher, D. Raabe and K. Lucke, Steel Res. 62, 1991, vol. 12, pp. 567-75.10.1002/srin.199100451 ↗
33. 33. S.-J. Choi, H.-D. Joo, J.-T. Park and N.-J. Park, Korean J. Met. Mater., 2016, vol. 54, pp. 540-45.10.3365/KJMM.2016.54.7.540 ↗
34. 34. J.-W. Yoon, F. Barlat, R. E. Dick, K. Chung and T. J. Kang, Inter. J. Plast., 2004, vol. 20, pp. 495-522.10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00099-8 ↗