The In-Situ Mechanics of the Tricuspid Valve: Strain Heterogeneity and Anisotropy via 3D Digital Image Correlation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Background The mechanics of the tricuspid valve are a critical determinant of its function and dysfunction. With millions suffering from tricuspid regurgitation, there is a pressing need to fill persistent knowledge gaps. A better understanding of the valve’s mechanics is essential for improving repair strategies and biomaterial-based replacements. Objective This study aimed to quantify the differences in strains within leaflets and between leaflets under both physiological and pathological loads. Methods We mounted six whole porcine heart preparations in vitro and measured full-field leaflet strains using three-dimensional digital image correlation. We varied peak transvalvular pressures between 20, 50, and 80 mmHg and applied three levels of annular dilation (0%, 30%, and 60%). Strain data were transformed into leaflet-specific radial and circumferential components, and compared statistically using linear mixed-effects models. Results Leaflet strains exhibited significant within- and between-leaflet heterogeneity. Strain magnitude increased with pressure but not with annular dilation. Additionally, strains were directionally dependent. Furthermore, we found that anterior and posterior leaflet strains near the annulus, in the belly, and near the free edge did not differ significantly. In contrast, strains in the septal leaflet increased from the annulus to the free edge. Conclusions These data provide spatially and directionally resolved strain maps of all three tricuspid valve leaflets in whole-heart preparations. By filling a critical knowledge gap, these findings may guide the design of biomaterials for valve repair and replacement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors · Congenital Heart Disease Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D et al (1999) Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 83(6):897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(98)01064-9, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291499801064910.1016/S0002-9149(98)01064-9 ↗
2. Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA (2004) Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(3):405–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.036, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S073510970301485210.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.036 ↗
3. Prihadi EA (2018) Tricuspid valve regurgitation: no longer the “forgotten valve”. E-J Cardiol Pract 16(30). https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-16/Tricuspid-valve-regurgitation-no-longer-the-forgotten-valve, issue: 30 Volume: 16
4. Stuge O, Liddicoat J (2006) Emerging opportunities for cardiac surgeons within structural heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132(6):1258–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.049, https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(06)01605-9/fulltext publisher: Elsevier10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.049 ↗
5. Henning RJ (2022) Tricuspid valve regurgitation: current diagnosis and treatment. Am J Cardiovas Disease 12(1):1–18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918740/10.2217/fca-2020-0189 ↗
6. Malinowski M, Schubert H, Wodarek J et al (2018) Tricuspid annular geometry and strain after suture annuloplasty in acute ovine right heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 106(6):1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.057, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000349751830876210.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.057 ↗
7. Wang TKM, Griffin BP, Miyasaka R et al (2020) Isolated surgical tricuspid repair versus replacement: meta-analysis of 15 069 patients. Open Heart 7(1):e001227. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001227, https://openheart.bmj.com/content/7/1/e001227, publisher: Archives of Disease in childhood Section: Valvular heart disease10.1136/openhrt-2019-001227 ↗
8. Wong W, Chen S, Chou A et al (2020) Late outcomes of valve repair versus replacement in isolated and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery: A nationwide cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 9(8):e015637. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015637, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.015637, publisher: Wiley10.1161/JAHA.119.015637 ↗
9. Dreyfus J, Galloo X, Taramasso M, et al (2023) TRI-SCORE and benefit of intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Eur Heart J ehad585. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad58510.1093/eurheartj/ehad585 ↗
10. Goldberg YH, Ho E, Chau M et al (2021) Update on transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement therapies. Front Cardiovas Med 8:619558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.619558, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917079/10.3389/fcvm.2021.619558 ↗
11. Hagemeyer D, Ong G, Peterson MD et al (2022) Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention: to repair or to replace? Curr Opin Cardiol 37(6):495. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000997, https://journals.lww.com/co-cardiology/abstract/2022/11000/transcatheter_tricuspid_valve_intervention__to.10.aspx10.1097/HCO.0000000000000997 ↗
12. Kheradvar A, Groves EM, Dasi LP, et al (2015) Emerging trends in heart valve engineering: Part I. Solutions for future. Ann Biomed Eng 43(4):833–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1209-z10.1007/s10439-014-1209-z ↗
13. Li RL, Russ J, Paschalides C et al (2019) Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing. Biomaterials 225:119493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119493, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296121930592710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119493 ↗
14. Mohammadi H, Mequanint K (2011) Prosthetic aortic heart valves: Modeling and design. Med Eng Phys 33(2):131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.017, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045331000213410.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.017 ↗
15. Zhu AS, Grande-Allen KJ (2018) Heart valve tissue engineering for valve replacement and disease modeling. Current Opinion Biomed Eng 5:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.12.006, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246845111730079X10.1016/j.cobme.2017.12.006 ↗
16. Chen Q, Bowdish ME, Malas J et al (2023) Isolated tricuspid operations: The society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 115(5):1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.12.041, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000349752300019X10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.12.041 ↗
17. Ng AP, Coaston T, Mallick S, et al (2025) Trends in utilization and outcomes of isolated and concomitant tricuspid valve operations in the United States. https://sts2025.eventscribe.net/fsPopup.asp?efp=VFdGTFFOUkIyMzY4OQ&PresentationID=1528320&rnd=0.81449&mode=presInfo
18. Yacoub MH, Takkenberg JJM (2005) Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2(2):60–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0112, https://www.nature.com/articles/ncpcardio0112, publisher: Nature Publishing Group10.1038/ncpcardio0112 ↗
19. Zack CJ, Fender EA, Chandrashekar P et al (2017) National trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(24):2953–2960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039, https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039, publisher: American College of Cardiology Foundation10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039 ↗
20. Spinner EM, Buice D, Yap CH et al (2012) The effects of a three-dimensional, saddle-shaped annulus on anterior and posterior leaflet stretch and regurgitation of the tricuspid valve. Ann Biomed Eng 40(5):996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0471-6, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-011-0471-610.1007/s10439-011-0471-6 ↗
21. Amini Khoiy K, Biswas D, Decker TN, et al (2016) Surface strains of porcine tricuspid valve septal leaflets measured in ex vivo beating hearts. J Biomech Eng 138(111006). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403462110.1115/1.4034621 ↗
22. Mathur M, Jazwiec T, Meador WD et al (2019) Tricuspid valve leaflet strains in the beating ovine heart. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18(5):1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01148-y, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10237-019-01148-y10.1007/s10237-019-01148-y ↗
23. Johnson EL, Laurence DW, Xu F et al (2021) Parameterization, geometric modeling, and isogeometric analysis of tricuspid valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 384:113960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11396010.1016/j.cma.2021.113960 ↗
24. Kong F, Pham T, Martin C et al (2018) Finite element analysis of tricuspid valve deformation from multi-slice computed tomography images. Ann Biomed Eng 46(8):1112–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2024-8, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-018-2024-810.1007/s10439-018-2024-8 ↗
25. Mathur M, Meador WD, Malinowski M, et al (2022) Texas TriValve 1.0 : a reverse-engineered, open model of the human tricuspid valve. Eng Comput 38(5):3835–3848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01659-w10.1007/s00366-022-01659-w ↗
26. Singh-Gryzbon S, Sadri V, Toma M et al (2019) Development of a computational method for simulating tricuspid valve dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 47(6):1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02243-y, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-019-02243-y10.1007/s10439-019-02243-y ↗
27. Duginski GA, Ross CJ, Laurence DW et al (2020) An investigation of the effect of freezing storage on the biaxial mechanical properties of excised porcine tricuspid valve anterior leaflets. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 101:103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103438, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161611930741610.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103438 ↗
28. Malinowski M, Jazwiec T, Goehler M et al (2019) Sonomicrometry-derived 3-dimensional geometry of the human tricuspid annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157(4):1452-1461.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.110, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002252231832505410.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.110 ↗
29. Mathur M, Meador WD, Jazwiec T et al (2020) The effect of downsizing on the normal tricuspid annulus. Ann Biomed Eng 48(2):655–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02387-x, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-019-02387-x10.1007/s10439-019-02387-x ↗
30. Afilalo J, Grapsa J, Nihoyannopoulos P, et al (2015) Leaflet area as a determinant of tricuspid regurgitation severity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Circulation: Cardiovas Imaging 8(5):e002714. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002714, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002714, publisher: American Heart Association10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002714 ↗
31. Sorajja P, Whisenant B, Hamid N, et al (2023) Transcatheter repair for patients with tricuspid regurgitation. New England J Med NEJMoa2300525. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2300525, http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa230052510.1056/NEJMoa2300525 ↗
32. Pierce EL, Sadri V, Ncho B et al (2019) Novel in vitro test systems and insights for transcatheter mitral valve design, part I: Paravalvular leakage. Ann Biomed Eng 47(2):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-02154-410.1007/s10439-018-02154-4 ↗
33. Salinas SD, Clark MM, Amini R (2019) Mechanical response changes in porcine tricuspid valve anterior leaflet under osmotic-induced swelling. Bioengineering 6(3):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030070, https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/3/70, number: 3 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute10.3390/bioengineering6030070 ↗
34. Rausch MK, Bothe W, Kvitting JPE et al (2011) In vivo dynamic strains of the ovine anterior mitral valve leaflet. J Biomech 44(6):1149–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.020, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111015/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.020 ↗
35. Meador WD, Mathur M, Sugerman GP et al (2020) A detailed mechanical and microstructural analysis of ovine tricuspid valve leaflets. Acta Biomater 102:100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.039, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S174270611930789510.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.039 ↗
36. Meador WD, Mathur M, Sugerman GP, et al (2020) The tricuspid valve also maladapts as shown in sheep with biventricular heart failure. eLife 9:e63855. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.6385510.7554/eLife.63855 ↗
37. Knief U, Forstmeier W (2021) Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behav Res Methods 53(6):2576–2590. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-510.3758/s13428-021-01587-5 ↗
38. Schielzeth H, Dingemanse NJ, Nakagawa S, et al (2020) Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods Ecol Evol 11(9):1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13434, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/2041-210X.1343410.1111/2041-210X.13434 ↗
39. LaRue T, Haese CE, Rausch M (2024) Raw data tables. https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/1JOOCX, https://dataverse.tdl.org/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10 .18738/T8/1JOOCX10.18738/T8/1JOOCX ↗
40. Mathur M, Meador WD, Jazwiec T et al (2020) Tricuspid valve annuloplasty alters leaflet mechanics. Ann Biomed Eng 48(12):2911–2923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02586-x, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-020-02586-x10.1007/s10439-020-02586-x ↗
41. Snyder Y, Jana S (2022) Strategies for development of decellularized heart valve scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 288:121675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121675, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296122200315510.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121675 ↗
42. Tong Q, Sun A, Wang Z et al (2022) Hybrid heart valves with VEGF-loaded zwitterionic hydrogel coating for improved anti-calcification and re-endothelialization. Mater Today Bio 17:100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100459, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259000642200257510.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100459 ↗
43. Motiwale S, Russell MD, Conroy O et al (2022) Anisotropic elastic behavior of a hydrogel-coated electrospun polyurethane: Suitability for heart valve leaflets. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 125:104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104877, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612100512910.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104877 ↗
44. Oveissi F, Naficy S, Lee A et al (2020) Materials and manufacturing perspectives in engineering heart valves: a review. Mater Today Bio 5:100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100038, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259000641930064X10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100038 ↗
45. Robinson A, Nkansah A, Bhat S, et al (2024) Hydrogel-polyurethane fiber composites with enhanced microarchitectural control for heart valve replacement. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 112(4):586–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37641, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jbm.a.3764110.1002/jbm.a.37641 ↗
46. Wang C, Zhang Z, Wang J et al (2022) Biohybrid materials: Structure design and biomedical applications. Mater Today Bio 16:100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100352, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259000642200150810.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100352 ↗
47. Wu Z, Li Q, Wang L et al (2023) A novel biomimetic nanofibrous cardiac tissue engineering scaffold with adjustable mechanical and electrical properties based on poly(glycerol sebacate) and polyaniline. Mater Today Bio 23:100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100798, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259000642300258210.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100798 ↗
48. Kostelnik CJ, Meador WD, Lin CY et al (2025) Tricuspid valve leaflet remodeling in sheep with biventricular heart failure: A comparison between leaflets. Acta Biomater 198:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2025.03.052, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174270612500234X10.1016/j.actbio.2025.03.052 ↗
49. Pearce D, Nemcek M, Witzenburg C (2022) Combining unique planar biaxial testing with full-field thickness and displacement measurement for spatial characterization of soft tissues. Current Protocols 2(7):e493. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.493, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cpz1.49310.1002/cpz1.493 ↗
50. Basu A, Lacerda C, He Z (2018) Mechanical Properties and Composition of the Basal Leaflet-Annulus Region of the Tricuspid Valve. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 9(2):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-018-0343-410.1007/s13239-018-0343-4 ↗
51. Bothe W, Kuhl E, Kvitting JPE et al (2011) Rigid, complete annuloplasty rings increase anterior mitral leaflet strains in the normal beating ovine heart. Circulation 124(11 Suppl):S81–S96. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011163, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319125/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011163 ↗
52. Ban E, Kalogerakos PD, Khosravi R et al (2023) Extended law of laplace for measurement of the cloverleaf anatomy of the aortic root. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39(7):1345–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02847-510.1007/s10554-023-02847-5 ↗
53. Gomez A, Wang Z, Xuan Y et al (2022) Association of diameter and wall stresses of tricuspid aortic valve ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 164(5):1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.05.049, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8716675/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.05.049 ↗
54. Prot V, Skallerud B (2009) Nonlinear solid finite element analysis of mitral valves with heterogeneous leaflet layers. Comput Mech 43(3):353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-008-0310-2, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00466-008-0310-210.1007/s00466-008-0310-2 ↗
55. Malinowski M, Jazwiec T, Ferguson H, et al (2021) Tricuspid leaflet kinematics after annular size reduction in ovine functional tricuspid regurgitation. J Thoracic Cardiovas Surgery e353–e366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.104, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002252232100203810.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.104 ↗