A Comparison of 3 Digital Image Correlation Techniques on Necessarily Suboptimal Random Patterns Recorded By X-Ray
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic x-rays have been used to follow the deformation ahead of a steel ball fired into a mock-up of a generic cylindrical rocket motor. The impact was arranged to intersect a sparse lead powder layer within the mock explosive that created a random speckle pattern on x-ray film. Three different digital image correlation programs are compared to examine any sensitivity to the sub-optimal speckle pattern produced by the lead powder. An identical output data reduction method was used in all cases to aid comparison. All three correlation methods were able analyze the deformation, but all had intricacies that would require more detailed optimization of the data reduction in order to fully exploit the technique. Quantitative analysis showed that the three methods agreed closely in estimations of rigid body displacements between a pair of representative x-ray images. It was discovered that the deformation caused by the ball impact was highly localized and the useful data available about the deformation pattern was sparse. This limits the applicability of this technique to this specific application. Extensive cracking was not observed that would have aided the development of computer-based models for prediction of such impact events. The x-ray technique was however excellent for determining the ball position as a function of time after impact.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Hild F, Roux S (2006) Digital image correlation: from displacement measurement to identification of elastic properties—a review. Strain 42(2):69–8010.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00258.x ↗
2. Sjodahl M (1994) Electronic speckle photography—increased accuracy by nonintegral pixel shifting. J Appl Opt 33:6667–667310.1364/AO.33.006667 ↗
3. Schreier HW, Braasch J, Sutton MA (2000) On the systematic errors in digital image correlation. Opt Eng 39(11):2915–292110.1117/1.1314593 ↗
4. Asay B (2010) Shock wave science and technology reference library, vol 5: non-shock initiation of explosives, 1 edn. Springer10.1007/978-3-540-87953-4 ↗
5. Bruck HA, McNeill SR, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton–Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 29:261–26710.1007/BF02321405 ↗
6. Peters WH, Ranson WF (1982) Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress analysis. Opt Eng 21:427
7. Peters WH, Ranson WF (1983) Application of digital correlation methods to rigid body mechanics. Opt Eng 22:738–74210.1117/12.7973231 ↗
8. Sutton MA, Wolters WJ, Peters WH, Ranson WF, McNeill SR (1983) Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vis Comput 1:133–13910.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-1 ↗
9. Cheng DJ, Chiang FP, Tan YS, Don HS (1993) Digital speckle-displacement measurement using a complex spectrum method. Appl Opt 32(11):1839–184910.1364/AO.32.001839 ↗
10. Eckstein A, Vlachos PP (2009) Digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) robust phase correlation. Meas Sci Technol 20:055,40110.1088/0957-0233/20/5/055401 ↗
11. Sjodahl M (1997) Accuracy in electronic speckle photography. J Appl Opt 36:2875–288510.1364/AO.36.002875 ↗
12. Sjodahl M, Benckert L (1993) Electronic speckle photography—analysis of an algorithm giving the displacement with subpixel accuracy. J Appl Opt 32:2278–228410.1364/AO.32.002278 ↗
13. Wang YQ, Sutton MA, Schreier HW (2009) Quantatative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interploation, subset size and image contrast on motion measurments. J Strain 45:160–17810.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00592.x ↗
14. White DJ, Take WA, Bolton MD (2003) Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Geotechnique 53(7):619–63110.1680/geot.2003.53.7.619 ↗