journal article·2012-11Open access

Optimization of Digital Image Correlation for High-Resolution Strain Mapping of Ceramic Composites

V. P. Rajan, M. N. Rossol, F. W. Zok

Experimental Mechanics· Volume 52· Issue 9

Abstract

Digital image correlation (DIC) is assessed as a tool for measuring strains with high spatial resolution in woven-fiber ceramic matrix composites. Using results of mechanical tests on aluminum alloy specimens in various geometric configurations, guidelines are provided for selecting DIC test parameters to maximize the extent of correlation and to minimize errors in displacements and strains. The latter error is shown to be exacerbated by the presence of strain gradients. In a case study, the resulting guidelines are applied to the measurement of strain fields in a SiC/SiC composite comprising 2-D woven fiber. Sub-fiber tow resolution of strain and low strain error are achieved. The fiber weave architecture is seen to exert a significant influence over strain heterogeneity within the composite. Moreover, strain concentrations at tow crossovers lead to the formation of macroscopic cracks in adjacent longitudinal tows. Such cracks initially grow stably, subject to increasing app lied stress, but ultimately lead to composite rupture. Once cracking is evident, the composite response is couched in terms of displacements, since the computed strains lack physical meaning in the vicinity of cracks. DIC is used to identify the locations of these cracks (via displacement discontinuities) and to measure the crack opening displacement profiles as a function of applied stress.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Sutton M, McNeill S, Helm J, Chao Y (2000) Advances in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. Photomechanics 77:323–37210.1007/3-540-48800-6_10 ↗
2. Sutton MA, Orteu J-J, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion, and deformation measurements. Springer10.1007/978-0-387-30877-7_20 ↗
3. Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42(3):30310.1007/BF02410987 ↗
4. Ke X-D, Schreier HW, Sutton MA, Wang YQ (2011) Error assessment in stereo-based deformation measurements, Part II: experimental validation of uncertainty and bias estimates. Exp Mech 51(4):423–44110.1007/s11340-010-9450-3 ↗
5. Cox BN, Flanagan G (1997) Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. NASA Contractor Report 4750
6. Novak MD, Zok FW (2011) High-temperature materials testing with full-field strain measurement: experimental design and practice. Rev Sci Instrum 82(11):11510110.1063/1.3657835 ↗
7. Bisagni C, Walters C (2008) Experimental investigation of the damage propagation in composite specimens under biaxial loading. Compos Struct 85(4):293–31010.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.029 ↗
8. Kazemahvazi S, Kiele J, Zenkert D (2010) Tensile strength of UD-composite laminates with multiple holes. Compos Sci Tech 70(8):1280–128710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.005 ↗
9. Lagattu F, Brillaud J, Lafarie-Frenot M-C (2004) High strain gradient measurements by using digital image correlation technique. Mater Charact 53(1):17–2810.1016/j.matchar.2004.07.009 ↗
10. Fuchs PF, Major Z (2010) Experimental determination of cohesive zone models for epoxy composites. Exp Mech 51(5):779–78610.1007/s11340-010-9370-2 ↗
11. Ramault C, Makris A, Van Hemelrijck D, Lamkanfi E, Van Paepegem WS (2010) Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen. Strain 47(S2):210–21710.1111/j.1475-1305.2010.00760.x ↗
12. Orteu J-J, Cutard T, Garcia D, Cailleux E, Robert L (2007) Application of stereovision to the mechanical characterisation of ceramic refractories reinforced with metallic fibres. Strain 43(2):96–10810.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00322.x ↗
13. Pankow M, Justusson B, Salvi A, Waas AM, Yen C-F, Ghiorse S (2011) Shock response of 3D woven composites: an experimental investigation. Compos Struct 93(5):1337–134610.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.021 ↗
14. Daggumati S, Voet E, Van Paepegem W, Degrieck J, Xu J, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2011) Local strain in a 5-harness satin weave composite under static tension: Part I — Experimental analysis. Compos Sci Tech 71(8):1171–117910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.021 ↗
15. Anzelotti G, Nicoletto G, Riva E (2008) Mesomechanic strain analysis of twill-weave composite lamina under unidirectional in-plane tension. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39(8):1294–130110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.01.006 ↗
16. Wang Y-Q, Sutton MA, Ke X-D, Schreier HW, Reu PL, Miller TJ (2011) On error assessment in stereo-based deformation measurements, Part I: theoretical developments for quantitative estimates. Exp Mech 51(4):405–42210.1007/s11340-010-9449-9 ↗
17. Robert L, Nazaret F, Cutard T, Orteu JJ (2007) Use of 3-D digital image correlation to characterize the mechanical behavior of a fiber reinforced refractory castable. Exp Mech 47(6):761–77310.1007/s11340-007-9062-8 ↗
18. Bornert M, Brémand F, Doumalin P, Dupré J-C, Fazzini M, Grédiac M, Hild F, Mistou S, Molimard J, Orteu J-J, Robert L, Surrel Y, Vacher P, Wattrisse B (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp Mech 49(3):353–37010.1007/s11340-008-9204-7 ↗
19. Avril S, Bonnet M, Bretelle A-S, Grédiac M, Hild F, Ienny P, Latourte F, Lemosse D, Pagano S, Pagnacco E, Pierron F (2008) Overview of identification methods of mechanical parameters based on full-field measurements. Exp Mech 48(4):381–40210.1007/s11340-008-9148-y ↗
20. Knauss WG, Huang Y, Chasiotis I (2003) Mechanical measurements at the micron and nanometer scales. Mech Mater 35(3–6):217–23110.1016/S0167-6636(02)00271-5 ↗
21. Haddadi H, Belhabib S (2008) Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique. Opt Lasers Eng 46(2):185–19610.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.05.008 ↗
22. Schreier HW, Braasch JR, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 39(11):2915–292110.1117/1.1314593 ↗
23. Vic-3D (2007) ®Software. Correlated Solutions Incorporated, Columbia, SC. http://www.correlatedsolutions.com
24. Nicoletto G, Anzelotti G, Riva E (2009) Mesoscopic strain fields in woven composites: experiments vs. finite element modeling. Opt Lasers Eng 47(3–4):352–35910.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.009 ↗
25. Rubin DM (2004) A simple autocorrelation algorithm for determining grain size from digital images of sediment. J Sediment Res 74(1):160–16510.1306/052203740160 ↗
26. Lecompte D, Smits A, Bossuyt S, Sol H, Vantomme J, Van Hemelrijck D, Habraken AM (2006) Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 44(11):1132–114510.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.10.004 ↗
27. Rasband WS (1997–2011) ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
28. Sutton MA, Yan J, Deng X, Cheng C-S, Zavattieri P (2007) Three-dimensional digital image correlation to quantify deformation and crack-opening displacement in ductile aluminum under mixed-mode I/III loading. Opt Eng 46(5):1–1610.1117/1.2741279 ↗
29. González C, Llorca J (2005) Stiffness of a curved beam subjected to axial load and large displacements. Int J Solids Struct 42(5–6):1537–154510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.018 ↗
30. Bao G, Suo Z (1992) Remarks on crack-bridging concepts. Appl Mech Rev 45(8):355-36610.1115/1.3119764 ↗