journal article·2011-04

Comparison between hot surface stress and effective stress acting at notch-like defect tip in a pressure vessel

M. Allouti, S. Jallouf, C. Schmitt, G. Pluvinage

Engineering Failure Analysis· Volume 18· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we have compared effective stress obtained by the Volumetric Method (VM) and hot surface stress (HS) obtained by linear or quadratic extrapolations for a longitudinal or transversal surface defect stress distribution in a pressure vessel. It appears clearly that the definition of hot surface stress through linear extrapolation characterises the gross stress distribution affected by stress concentration. It has been found that effective stress and hot surface stress are close. This is due to the fact that the tested pressure vessel is made with a thin pipe of ductile material where plastic relaxation induced a smooth peak stress distribution. Prediction of stress distribution at the deepest point of a surface defect from stress distribution at surface tip of the defect exhibits some difficulties due to modification of stress intensity and stress gradient.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. 6th EGIG report 1970–2004. Gas pipeline incidents. Doc. Number EGIG 05.R.0002 December; 2005.
2. Theory of stress concentration for shear-strained prismatic bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress–strain law10.1115/1.3641780 ↗
3. Peterson · 1974
4. The critical volume method in fatigue analysis in Notch effects in fatigue and Fracture
5. Pluvinage · 2003
6. The method of geometrical stress for parts with longitudinal stiffeners
7. Casavola K, Pappalettere C. Evaluation of fatigue strength of aluminium alloy welded joints by WELFARE method, the case of thin main plate thickness. In: Proceedings of the international conference new trends in fatigue and fracture 5 (NT 2F5), Bari (Italy); 2005.
8. Stress singularity resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension10.1115/1.4010553 ↗
9. Newman JC, Lease Jr K. Fracture under low-constraint conditions – from laboratory coupons to structural applications. In: Proceedings international conference on fracture, Ottawa, July; 2009.
10. Dixon JR, Stranningen JS. Stress distribution and buckling in sheets with central slits. Fracture, Brighton; 1965. p. 105–18.
11. El Hakimi A, Hariri S, Azari Z, Laksimi A, Le Grognec P. Etude numérique et expérimentale de la nocivité des défauts dans les coques sphériques. Congrès de Mécanique, CFM, Troyes, France; 2005.