Stabilisation of the Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament following the Canterbury earthquakes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As a result of the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake and the more damaging 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, considerable damage occurred to a significant number of buildings in Christchurch. The damage that occurred to the Christchurch Roman Catholic Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament (commonly known as the Christchurch Basilica) as a result of the Canterbury earthquakes is reported, and the observed failure modes are identified. A previous strengthening intervention is outlined and the estimated capacity of the building is discussed. This strengthening was completed in 2004, and addressed the worst aspects of the building’s seismic vulnerability. Urgent work was undertaken post-earthquake to secure parts of the building in order to limit damage and prevent collapse of unstable parts of the building. The approach taken for this securing is outlined, and the performance of the building and the previously installed earthquake strengthening intervention is evaluated. A key consideration throughout the project was the interaction between the structural securing requirements that were driven by the requirement to limit damage and mitigate hazards, and the heritage considerations. Lessons learnt from the strengthening that was carried out, the securing work undertaken, and the approach taken in making the building “safe” are discussed. Some conclusions are drawn with respect to the effectiveness of strengthening similar building types, and the approach taken to secure the building under active seismic conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · earthquake and tectonic studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake10.1785/gssrl.82.6.853 ↗
2. Cairns L. Powerless to stop heritage demolition. The Christchurch press. [accessed 15.12.12]; 2012.
3. DBH, Building act 1991. Section 66, buildings which are determined to be earthquake prone. Department of building and housing; 1991.
4. The Darfield (Canterbury, New Zealand) Mw 7.1 earthquake of September 2010: a preliminary seismological report10.1785/gssrl.82.3.378 ↗
5. GNS. Response spectra for accelerogram 20100903_163541_CCCC. [last accessed 19.07.12]; 2010.
6. GNS. Response spectra for accelerogram 20100903_163541_CCCC. [last accessed 19.07.12]; 2011.
7. Hamilton PR. Francis Petre: 1847–1918. An investigation into New Zealand architectural biography. MA thesis, University of Auckland; 1986.
8. Structural aspects of the conservation of historic masonry constructions in seismic areas: remedial measures and emergency actions10.1080/15583058.2011.569632 ↗
9. NZHPT. Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament (Catholic). www.historic.org.nz/TheRegister/RegisterSearch/RegisterResults.aspx?RID=47 [last accessed 18.07.12]; 2012.
10. NZS. NZS 4203:1992. Code of practice for general structural design and design loadings for buildings; vol. 1: code of practice, Standards New Zealand; 1992.
11. NZS. NZS 1170.0, 2002. Structural design actions, part 0: general principles. Standards New Zealand; 2002.
12. D’Ayala D, Speranza E. An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of historic buildings. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, 9–13 September London, Paper 561; 2002.
13. Wynn-Williams DB. The Basilicas of F.W. Petre. MA thesis, University of Canterbury; 1982.