journal article·2002-02

Remnant life assessment of service-exposed pendent superheater tubes

A.K Ray, Y.N Tiwari, R.K Sinha, P.K Roy, S.K Sinha, R Singh, S Chaudhuri

Engineering Failure Analysis· Volume 9· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Remnant life assessment and life extension has become an integral part of plant maintenance activities, Cr–Mo steels are widely used in thermal power plants at a temperature of about 550°C. This paper deals with the high temperature tensile and creep rupture properties of 1Cr–0.5Mo steels for pendent superheater tubes in a boiler of a thermal power plant after five years service exposure for 43,000 h. Based on stress vs Larson Miller Parameter plot and at the operating hoop stress level, the pendent superheater tubes in general are found to be in a good state of health and can continue to remain in service for a length of 10 years, provided the temperature of the tube is brought down below 500°C. This observation may not be true for those selected tubes where already expansion in the diameter has taken place. Such tubes should be identified and replaced. In the case that it is not possible to bring down the temperature below 500°C, it may be desirable to use a superior grade of material like 2.25Cr–1Mo or 9Cr–1Mo steel. A thicker tube of the same grade may also be considered provided the overall load of the panel does not exceed the limit. It is, however, recommended that a similar health check be carried out after five years.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. D'Angelo D, Percivate A. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Creep, Tokyo, Japan, 14–18 April l986.
2. Klevtsov IA, Tallermo KhA. Teploenergetika 1996:12:21.
3. Endo T. Int J Pressure Vessel and Piping 1994;57(1):7.10.1016/0308-0161(94)90093-0 ↗
4. Witte M de. Int J Pressure Vessel and Piping 1996;39(1–2):41.
5. Li YD. Int J Pressure Vessel and Piping 1996;69(2):161.10.1016/0308-0161(95)00128-X ↗
6. Klevtsov I, Tallermo H, Crane RA. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Plant Condition & Life Measurement (Vol. I), Helsinki, Finland (6–8 June 1995): Pub-Technical Research Centre of Finland.
7. Wilshire B. Int J Pressure Vessel and Piping 1989;39(1–2):73.10.1016/0308-0161(89)90039-2 ↗
8. Viswanathan R, Dooley R, Saxena A. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Life Assessment and Extension (Vol II), Congress Centre, The Hague/The Netherlands (13–15 June 1988). p. 175.
9. Singh AK, Bagdasarian AJ, Malhotra VK. In: NACE International, Houston, Texas, USA, 1994. p. 21.
10. Gabriel J, Vanderschaeghe, Vigneron G. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Life Assessment and Extension (Vol II), Congress Centre, The Hague/The Netherlands, 13–15 June 1988. p. 136.
11. Goodwall TW, Ainsworth RA. CEGB Res. 1984;16:34.
12. Data sheets on the elevated-temperatue properties of 1Cr–0.5Mo steel for boiler and heat exchanger seamless tubes (STBA 22), NRIM creep data sheet, No. 1A (1976).
13. Ray AK, Tiwari YN, Sinha RK, Chaudhuri S, Singh R. Engineering Failure Analysis 2000;7(5):359.10.1016/S1350-6307(99)00024-2 ↗
14. Ray AK, Tiwari YN, Chaudhuri S. Engineering Failure Analysis 2000:7(6):393.10.1016/S1350-6307(99)00037-0 ↗
15. Ray AK, Tiwari YN, Sinha RK, Sinha SK, Roy PK, Singh R, Chaudhuri S. J High Temperature Materials and Processes 2001:20(1):39.10.1515/HTMP.2001.20.1.39 ↗