journal article·2025-11Open access

Diagnosis and preliminary structural analysis of a historic masonry church in Craiova, Romania

Marius Mosoarca, Mihai Fofiu, Yohei Endo

Abstract

The process of identifying optimal strengthening solutions for load-bearing structures damaged by extraordinary actions is a complex undertaking. It is based on the conclusions of analyses carried out by a multidisciplinary team composed of historians, archaeologists, architects, structural engineers, chemists, geophysicists, painting restorers, and others. Furthermore, the article demonstrates that any major intervention on the load bearing structure of a historic monument can disrupt its original equilibrium state and, over time, can even exacerbate structural damage. The use of new materials that have not yet stood the test of time highlights the importance of employing original, local materials that historically ensured, and can continue to ensure, the long-term sustainability of the building. The article presents investigative methods aimed at explaining the complex collapse mechanisms triggered by the accumulation of structural damage caused by repeated seismic events that affect historic churches in the Craiova area, located in southern Romania. The research focusses on the history of reinforcement of the Church of Saints Archangels Michael and Gabriel in Craiova, an emblematic 18th-century masonry structure repeatedly subjected to various actions, including both exceptional events such as earthquakes and long-term actions such as ground settlements and inappropriate human interventions. The study traces the evolution of damage and reinforcement works carried out between 1838 and 1990, analysing the consequences of incompatible and poorly conceived strengthening measures, particularly the insertion of reinforced concrete elements into columns and arches. As part of this investigation, a diagnostic campaign was carried out on site to assess the condition of the church load bearing structure. This campaign employed nondestructive and minimally invasive techniques such as flat-jack tests, thermography, and in situ dynamic analysis. Numerical simulations calibrated with field data revealed critical structural vulnerabilities and confirmed the negative impact of uncoordinated interventions over time. The Romanian seismic safety index (R 3 ), determined for multiple seismic loading directions, indicates that the building currently requires further strengthening due to the adverse effects of previous interventions. The findings reinforce the idea that reversible strengthening strategies − aligned with the principles of the Venice Charter − must be guided by a thorough multidisciplinary assessment of all previous interventions performed on the structure over time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Giorgio Croci, Conservazione e restauro strutturale dei beni architettonici. ISBN-13-978-8825173758, 2012.
2. Cesare Brandi, Teoria Restaurarii (in Romanian). Bucuresti: Editura Meridiane ISBN 973-33-0330-5, 1994.
3. Reinforced concrete interventions on the collapse mechanism of historical masonry structures with detailed finite element analyses: Kabasakal Mosque10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109504 ↗
4. Failure analysis of existing structures and infrastructures under extreme events and long-term actions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107842 ↗
5. An example for determining the cause of damage in historical buildings: Little hagia sophia (Church of St. Sergius and Bacchus)–Istanbul, Turkey10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.11.004 ↗
6. Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026 ↗
7. Damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms activation of historical masonry churches under seismic actions: three case studies in Mantua10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.017 ↗
8. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021 ↗
9. Advanced FE nonlinear numerical modeling to predict historical masonry vaults failure: Assessment of risk collapse for a long span cloister vault heavily loaded at the crown by means of a general-purpose numerical protocol10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109070 ↗
10. Seismic vulnerability assessment of churches at regional scale after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake10.1504/IJMRI.2019.096824 ↗
11. Structural analysis of historical masonry churches: the case study of S. Giuseppe delle Scalze (Naples, Italy)10.1504/IJMRI.2021.118829 ↗
12. Seismic vulnerability assessment of two territorial case studies of italian ancient churches: Comparison between simplified and refined numerical models10.1504/IJMRI.2022.119890 ↗
13. Damage assessment of Apennine masonry churches severely damaged during the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence10.1504/IJMRI.2024.139564 ↗
14. Failure analysis of Monastery of Jerónimos, Lisbon: how to learn from sophisticated numerical models10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.002 ↗
15. Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.015 ↗
16. Seismic assessment of typical historical masonry churches in Banat region, Romania-part I10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.263 ↗
17. Seismic assessment of typical historical masonry churches in the Banat region, Romania-Part II10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.261 ↗
18. Seismic assessment of Romanian Orthodox masonry churches in the Banat area through a multi-level analysis framework10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107539 ↗
19. Seismic vulnerability assessment for the historical areas of the Timisoara city, Romania10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.013 ↗
20. The effect of ground motion vertical component on the seismic response of historical masonry buildings: the case study of the Banloc Castle in Romania10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113346 ↗
21. Simplified vulnerability assessment of historical churches in Banat Seismic Region, Romania10.1080/15583058.2024.2341054 ↗
22. Failure analysis of historical buildings due to climate change10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.013 ↗
23. Failure mechanism of historic churches in Gorj county for shallow seismic action10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107502 ↗
24. Mosoarca, M., Casarin, F., Yohei, E., Fofiu, M., Gosta, M., Anastasiadis, A., & Hortopan, A. (2024). The behaviour of orthodox historic churches built with lime mortar in Romania consolidated with reinforced concrete after the 1977 earthquake. InMATEC Web of Conferences(Vol. 403, p. 07016). EDP Sciences.10.1051/matecconf/202440307016 ↗
25. Institutul national de cercetare–dezvoltare pentru fizica pământului
26. Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice, “Cod de proiectare seismica P100-3/2019 (in Romanian),” Bucuresti, 2019.
27. Institutul Naţional de Cercetare - Dezvoltare pentru Fizica Pământului INCDFP, “Harta seismica a Romaniei (in Romanian),” https://infp.ro/index.php?i=edu.
28. https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/List%C4%83_de_cutremure_%C3%AEn_Rom%C3%A2nia, “Istoric cutremure Romania (in romaninan).”.
29. S.C. PROGE EXPERT SRL, “Studiu geotehnic (in Romanian) nr. 106/2024,” Craiova, 2024.
30. EXPINLAB PADOVA, “Technical Report 3 NDT/MDT Structural Tests Job nr.: 231009MMO ,” Padova, 2024.
31. “ „Cutremurele Vrâncene subcrustale majore produse în secolul al XX-lea și efectele acestora pe teritoriul României
32. Triță, L., Gavrilă, V., & Băbălău, N. (1978).Noaptea cea mai lungă a Craiovei [4 martie 1977]. Scrisul românesc.
33. Effect of restoration interventions on the seismic behavior of historical masonry buildings: the case of Molla Siyah mosque10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107206 ↗
34. Assessment of seismic behavior of historical masonry cupolas: Case of Emir Saltuk Cupola
35. Understanding roots of failure of historical Ottoman monumental buildings by means of advanced finite element modelling: the effect of the 1939 Erzincan earthquake on Nafiz Pasha Bath-house and Izzet Pasha Mosque10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109811 ↗